Proton arc therapy increases the benefit of proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer patients in the model based clinic

被引:12
|
作者
Jong, Bas A. [1 ,3 ]
Korevaar, Erik W. [1 ]
Maring, Anneke [1 ]
Werkman, Chimene I. [1 ]
Scandurra, Daniel [1 ]
Janssens, Guillaume [2 ]
Both, Stefan [1 ]
Langendijk, Johannes A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Ion Beam Applicat SA, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium
[3] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, POB 30001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Proton arc therapy; Model based clinic; Head and neck cancer; Static arc; Patient selection; Proton therapy; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; NECK-CANCER; HEAD; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109670
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: In the model-based approach, patients qualify for proton therapy when the reduction in risk of toxicity (ANTCP) obtained with IMPT relative to VMAT is larger than predefined thresholds as defined by the Dutch National Indication Protocol (NIPP). Proton arc therapy (PAT) is an emerging technology which has the potential to further decrease NTCPs compared to IMPT. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential impact of PAT on the number of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients that qualify for proton therapy.Materials and methods: A prospective cohort of 223 OPC patients subjected to the model-based selection procedure was investigated. 33 (15%) patients were considered unsuitable for proton treatment before plan comparison. When IMPT was compared to VMAT for the remaining 190 patients, 148 (66%) patients qualified for protons and 42 (19%) patients did not. For these 42 patients treated with VMAT, robust PAT plans were generated.Results: PAT plans provided better or similar target coverage compared to IMPT plans. In the PAT plans, integral dose was significantly reduced by 18% relative to IMPT plans and by 54% relative to VMAT plans. PAT decreased the mean dose to numerous organs-at-risk (OARs), further reducing NTCPs. The ANTCP for PAT relative to VMAT passed the NIPP thresholds for 32 out of the 42 patients treated with VMAT, resulting in 180 patients (81%) of the complete cohort qualifying for protons.Conclusion: PAT outperforms IMPT and VMAT, leading to a further reduction of NTCP-values and higher ANTCP-values, significantly increasing the percentage of OPC patients selected for proton therapy.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. Radiotherapy and Oncology 184 (2023) 109670 This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Proton Therapy: A Ray of Hope for the Cancer Patients
    Khamkat, Piyali
    Barik, Vivek
    Mukherjee, Swarupananda
    Karati, Dipanjan
    [J]. CURRENT CANCER THERAPY REVIEWS, 2024,
  • [32] Radiobiological Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, 3D Conformal Proton Therapy and Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer
    Sullivan, M.
    Jin, H.
    Ahmad, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E853 - E853
  • [33] Estimated benefit of proton therapy and dose de-escalation in HPV p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer
    Brodin, P.
    Kabarriti, R.
    Gondi, V.
    Pankuch, M.
    Garg, M.
    Tome, W.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S644 - S645
  • [34] Scanning Proton Arc Therapy (SPArc) - The First Robust and Delivery-Efficient Spot Scanning Proton Arc Therapy
    Ding, X.
    Li, X.
    Zhang, J.
    Kabolizadeh, P.
    Stevens, C.
    Yan, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3888 - 3888
  • [35] Risk of radiogenic second cancers following volumetric modulated arc therapy and proton arc therapy for prostate cancer
    Rechner, Laura A.
    Howell, Rebecca M.
    Zhang, Rui
    Etzel, Carol
    Lee, Andrew K.
    Newhauser, Wayne D.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (21): : 7117 - 7132
  • [36] First experience with model-based selection of head and neck cancer patients for proton therapy
    Tambas, Makbule
    Steenbakkers, Roel J. H. M.
    van der Laan, Hans P.
    Wolters, Atje M.
    Kierkels, Roel G. J.
    Scandurra, Dan
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Oldehinkel, Edwin
    van Zon-Meijer, Tineke W. H.
    Both, Stefan
    van den Hoek, Johanna G. M.
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 151 : 206 - 213
  • [37] Preselection Tool for the Model-Based Selection of Head and Neck Cancer Patients for Proton Therapy
    Tambas, M.
    van der Laan, H. P.
    Hoek, A. V. D.
    Bijl, H. P.
    Dieters, M.
    Scandurra, D.
    Both, S.
    Steenbakkers, R.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E384 - E384
  • [38] First experience with the model-based selection of head and neck cancer patients for proton therapy
    Tambas, M.
    Van der Laan, H. P.
    Van den Hoek, J. G. M.
    Bijl, H. P.
    Dieters, M.
    Kierkels, R. G. J.
    Scandurra, D.
    Both, S.
    Steenbakkers, R. J. H. M.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S293 - S294
  • [39] Postoperative proton therapy for pancreas cancer patients on the Proton Collaborative Group registry
    Nichols, R.
    Morris, C.
    Prabhu, K.
    Hartsell, W.
    Cahlon, O.
    Apisarnthanarax, S.
    McGee, L.
    Vargas, C.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S770 - S771
  • [40] Robustness of multifield pseudo-arc proton therapy for sinonasal cancer
    Argota-Perez, Raul
    Elstrom, Ulrik V.
    Jensen, Kenneth
    Korreman, Stine S.
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2023, 62 (05) : 508 - 512