The impact of treatment accuracy on proton therapy patient selection for oropharyngeal cancer patients

被引:24
|
作者
Arts, Tine [1 ]
Breedveld, Sebastiaan [1 ]
de Jong, Martin A. [2 ]
Astreinidou, Eleftheria [2 ]
Tans, Lisa [1 ]
Keskin-Cambay, Fatma [1 ]
Krol, Augustinus D. G. [2 ]
van de Water, Steven [1 ]
Bijman, Rik G. [1 ]
Hoogeman, Mischa S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, POB 5201, NL-3008 AE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] LUMC, Dept Radiat Oncol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Proton therapy; Head and neck cancer; Oropharyngeal cancer; IMRT; IMPT; Robust optimization; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; COMPLICATION PROBABILITY; NECK-CANCER; SETUP UNCERTAINTIES; SALIVARY-GLANDS; HEAD; OPTIMIZATION; ROBUSTNESS; MODEL; MARGINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.028
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: The impact of treatment accuracy on NTCP-based patient selection for proton therapy is currently unknown. This study investigates this impact for oropharyngeal cancer patients. Materials and methods: Data of 78 patients was used to automatically generate treatment plans for a simultaneously integrated boost prescribing 70 Gy(RBE)/54.25 Gy(RBE) in 35 fractions. IMRT treatment plans were generated with three different margins; intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans for five different setup and range robustness settings. Four NTCP models were evaluated. Patients were selected for proton therapy if NTCP reduction was >= 10% or >= 5% for grade II or III complications, respectively. Results: The degree of robustness had little impact on patient selection for tube feeding dependence, while the margin had. For other complications the impact of the robustness setting was noticeably higher. For high-precision IMRT (3 mm margin) and high-precision IMPT (3 mm setup/3% range error), most patients were selected for proton therapy based on problems swallowing solid food (51.3%) followed by tube feeding dependence (37.2%), decreased parotid flow (29.5%), and patient-rated xerostomia (7.7%). Conclusions: Treatment accuracy has a significant impact on the number of patients selected for proton therapy. Therefore, it cannot be ignored in estimating the number of patients for proton therapy. (c) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 525
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Role of proton therapy in the treatment of cancer
    Hicsonmez, Ayse
    Guney, Yildiz
    [J]. TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 28 (04): : 167 - 178
  • [42] Proton therapy as a cancer treatment option
    Cai, Haihong
    Mahajan, Anita
    Cox, James
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2007, 34 (06) : 1240 - 1240
  • [43] Investigating proton therapy as a treatment option for pregnant breast cancer patients
    Ahmad, R.
    Baer, E.
    Pile, K.
    Collins-Fekete, C.
    Gulliford, S.
    Wickers, S.
    Hawkins, M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1533 - S1534
  • [44] Patient Preferences in Early Oropharyngeal Cancer Treatment: Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) Versus Radiation Therapy
    Lam, J.
    Scott, G.
    Palma, D. A.
    Fung, K.
    Louie, A. V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : S219 - S220
  • [45] Impact of CBCT-based patient positioning uncertainty due to the ROI/DOF selection for proton therapy
    Guo, M.
    Batin, E.
    Bolsi, A.
    Safai, S.
    Weber, D.
    Lomax, A.
    Chen, Z.
    Zhang, Y.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S343 - S345
  • [46] Patient preferences for oropharyngeal cancer treatment de-escalation
    Brotherston, Drew C.
    Poon, Ian
    Le, Tuyen
    Leung, Martin
    Kiss, Alex
    Ringash, Jolie
    Balogh, Judith
    Lee, Justin
    Wright, James R.
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2013, 35 (02): : 151 - 159
  • [47] The impact of patient educational level on selection of treatment for newly diagnosed prostate cancer
    Kane, CJ
    Lubeck, DP
    Spitalny, GM
    Knight, S
    Grossfeld, GD
    Mehta, S
    Carroll, PR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 69 - 69
  • [48] A Decision Support Tool to Optimize Selection of Head and Neck Cancer Patients for Proton Therapy
    Tambas, Makbule
    van der Laan, Hans Paul
    van der Schaaf, Arjen
    Steenbakkers, Roel J. H. M.
    Langendijk, Johannes Albertus
    [J]. CANCERS, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [49] Accuracy of plasma RAS mutation testing for therapy selection and monitoring of colorectal cancer patients
    Vidal Barrull, J.
    Romay, L. Muinelo
    Dalmases, A.
    Abalo, A.
    Vela, M. C.
    Abreu Rodriguez, M.
    Muset, M.
    Ruiz, J.
    Iglesias, M.
    Blanco, C.
    Lopez, E.
    Rodriguez, C.
    Jones, F. S.
    Edelstein, D.
    Lukas, A.
    Albanell, J.
    Bellosillo, B.
    Candamio, S.
    Montagut, C.
    Lopez, R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27
  • [50] Patient-Reported Hip Symptoms Following Treatment With Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Kil, W. J.
    Hoppe, B. S.
    Morris, C. G.
    Nichols, R. C.
    Henderson, R. H.
    Mendenhall, W. M.
    Williams, C. R.
    Li, Z.
    Mendenhall, N. P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S350 - S350