Simplified protocol for whole-body Patlak parametric imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT: Feasibility and error analysis

被引:19
|
作者
Yao, Shulin [1 ]
Feng, Tao [2 ]
Zhao, Yizhang [3 ]
Wu, Runze [3 ]
Wang, Ruimin [1 ]
Wu, Shina [1 ]
Li, Can [1 ]
Xu, Baixuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
[2] UIH Amer Inc, Houston, TX 75054 USA
[3] Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai 201807, Peoples R China
关键词
input function; Patlak model; whole body parametric imaging;
D O I
10.1002/mp.14187
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Parametric imaging using the Patlak model has been shown to provide improved lesion detectability and specificity. The Patlak model requires both tissue time-activity curves (TACs) after equilibrium and knowledge of the input function from the start of injection. Therefore, the conventional dynamic scanning protocol typically starts from the radiotracer injection all the way to equilibrium. In this paper, we propose the use of hybrid population-based and model-based input function estimation and evaluate its use for whole-body Patlak analysis, in order to reduce the total scan time and simplify clinical Patlak parametric imaging protocols. Possible quantitative errors caused by the simplified scanning protocol were also analyzed both theoretically and with the use of clinical data. Materials and methods Clinical data from 24 patients referred for tumor staging were included in this study. The patients underwent a whole-body dynamic PET study, 20 min after FDG injection (0.13 mCi/kg). The proposed whole-body scanning protocol includes 6 passes with 4-5 bed positions, depending on the size of the patient, with 2 min for each bed position. An input function from the literature was selected as the shape of the population-based input function. The descending aorta from the corresponding CT image was segmented and applied on the reconstructed dynamic PET images to acquire an image-based input function, which was later fitted using an exponential model. Due to the late scan time, only the later portion of the input function was available, which was used to scale the population-based input function. The hybrid input function was used to derive the whole-body Patlak images. Assuming a given error in the population-based input function, its influence on the final Patlak images were also derived theoretically and verified using the clinical data sets. Finally, the image quality of the reconstructed Patlak slope image was evaluated by an experienced radiologist in four different aspects: image artifacts, image noise, lesion sharpness, and lesion detectability. Results It was found that errors in the population-based input function only affect the absolute scale of the Patlak slope image. The induced error is proportional to the percentage area-under-curve (AUC) error in the input function. These findings were also confirmed by numerical analysis. The predicted global scale was in good agreement with results from both image-based Patlak and direct Patlak approach. The fractions of the AUC from the early portion population-based input function were also found to be around 18% of the total AUC of the input function, further limiting the propagation of quantitation error from population-based input function to the final Patlak slope image. The reconstructed Patlak images were also found by the radiologist to provide excellent confidence in lesion detection tasks. Conclusions We have proposed a simplified whole-body scanning protocol that utilizes both population-based input function and model-based input function. The error from the population-based function was found to only affect the global scale and the overall quantitative impact can be predicted using our proposed formulas.
引用
收藏
页码:2160 / 2169
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Comparison of Whole-Body Versus Limited Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Malignant Cutaneous Melanoma
    Lazaga, Francisco Jose
    Oez, Orhan K.
    Adams-Huet, Beverley
    Anderson, Jon
    Mathews, Dana
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 38 (11) : 882 - 884
  • [43] Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Suspected Paraneoplastic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy
    Sheikhbahaei, Sara
    Marcus, Charles V.
    Fragomeni, Roberto S.
    Rowe, Steven P.
    Javadi, Mehrbod S.
    Solnes, Lilja B.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 58 (07) : 1031 - 1036
  • [44] Assessment of population-based input functions for Patlak imaging of whole body dynamic 18F-FDG PET
    Naganawa, Mika
    Gallezot, Jean-Dominique
    Shah, Vijay
    Mulnix, Tim
    Young, Colin
    Dias, Mark
    Chen, Ming-Kai
    Smith, Anne M.
    Carson, Richard E.
    EJNMMI PHYSICS, 2020, 7 (01)
  • [45] Assessment of population-based input functions for Patlak imaging of whole body dynamic 18F-FDG PET
    Mika Naganawa
    Jean-Dominique Gallezot
    Vijay Shah
    Tim Mulnix
    Colin Young
    Mark Dias
    Ming-Kai Chen
    Anne M. Smith
    Richard E. Carson
    EJNMMI Physics, 7
  • [46] 18F-FDG-avid plantar nodules on true whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in cancer patients
    Muzaffar, Razi
    Raslan, Osama
    Osman, Medhat M.
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 36 (09) : 881 - 886
  • [47] Analysis and establishment of adult diagnostic reference level for whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging: A single institutional study
    Ridhwan, Ahmad Faez Mohamed
    Chen, Ew-Jun
    Selvam, Haniff Shazwan Safwan
    Chew, Ming Tsuey
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2023, 210
  • [48] Optimization of Injected Activity for Whole-Body [18F]FDG PET/CT Imaging
    Hart, Alexander
    Bazalova-Carter, Magdalena
    Rahmim, Arman
    Uribe, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 62
  • [49] Whole-body 18F-FDG PET in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Yen, RF
    Hong, RL
    Tzen, KY
    Pan, MH
    Chen, THH
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2005, 46 (05) : 770 - 774
  • [50] Whole-body staging of female patients with recurrent pelvic malignancies: Ultra-fast 18F-FDG PET/MRI compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT
    Kirchner, Julian
    Sawicki, Lino Morris
    Suntharalingam, Saravanabavaan
    Grueneisen, Johannes
    Ruhlmann, Verena
    Aktas, Bahriye
    Deuschl, Cornelius
    Herrmann, Ken
    Antoch, Gerald
    Forsting, Michael
    Umutlu, Lale
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02):