A flexible tool to prioritize areas for conservation combining landscape units, measures of biodiversity, and threats

被引:5
|
作者
Ondei, Stefania [1 ]
Brook, Barry W. [1 ,2 ]
Buettel, Jessie C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Nat Sci, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
[2] Ctr Excellence Australian Biodivers & Heritage CA, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2019年 / 10卷 / 09期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Australia; bioregionalization; Interim Biogeographic Regionalization for Australia; invasive species; irreplaceability; land-use change; nature conservation; threatened species; vulnerability; LAND-USE CHANGE; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; PROTECTED AREAS; GAP ANALYSIS; VULNERABILITY; ECOLOGY; CLIMATE; IRREPLACEABILITY; SYSTEM; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.2859
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Expanding the reserve system is a key strategy to enhance biodiversity protection. Yet, conservation outcomes can be undermined by underrepresentation of some habitats and opportunistic placement of protected areas. Irreplaceability and vulnerability, the key principles of conservation, should thus be combined within a bioregionalization framework to implement protection in the habitats that most need it. We proposed a simple and flexible method to prioritize bioregions for conservation based on these principles and used it to rank the 85 bioregions of the Australian continent. To do so, we quantified biodiversity values and threats in each bioregion by gathering open-access data on species, landscapes, and land use. Bioregions were then ranked using a set of customizable scenarios, including ecologically meaningful combinations of measures of irreplaceability and vulnerability. To identify biodiverse areas under threat but potentially overlooked, we compared our results with the location of already established biodiversity hotspots (i.e., areas identified as important for biodiversity and under threat). We found that bioregions with the highest biodiversity values are predominantly located in the southwest, east, and north of the continent. Similarly, threats, particularly land clearance, are concentrated along the east coast and in the southwest. When ranking bioregions using scenarios including both threats and biodiversity values, the majority (75%) of the highest-ranking bioregions were already included in biodiversity hotspots. For five of these bioregions, the proportion of protected land to date still falls below the 17% recommended by the Convention on Biological Diversity and thus they likely require prompt prioritization and intervention. The method proposed can support ongoing monitoring and prioritization of land units for conservation. Its simplicity and flexibility mean it can be easily adopted for different areas and adjusted to local priorities.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [31] A Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Modeling Approach to Prioritize Soil Conservation Management in River Basin Critical Areas Coupled With Future Climate Scenario Analysis
    Pandey, Ashish
    Bishal, K. C.
    Kalura, Praveen
    Chowdary, V. M.
    Jha, C. S.
    Cerda, Artemi
    [J]. AIR SOIL AND WATER RESEARCH, 2021, 14
  • [32] The prevalence, characteristics and effectiveness of Aichi Target 11′s "other effective area-based conservation measures" (OECMs) in Key Biodiversity Areas
    Donald, Paul F.
    Buchanan, Graeme M.
    Balmford, Andrew
    Bingham, Heather
    Couturier, Andrew R.
    de la Rosa, Gregorio E., Jr.
    Gacheru, Paul
    Herzog, Sebastian K.
    Jathar, Girish
    Kingston, Naomi
    Marnewick, Daniel
    Maurer, Golo
    Reaney, Leeann
    Shmygaleva, Tatyana
    Sklyarenko, Sergey
    Stevens, Candice M. D.
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2019, 12 (05):
  • [33] Bottom-up design process of agri-environmental measures at a landscape scale: Evidence from case studies on biodiversity conservation and water protection
    Toderi, Marco
    Francioni, Matteo
    Seddaiu, Giovanna
    Roggero, Pier Paolo
    Trozzo, Laura
    D'Ottavio, Paride
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2017, 68 : 295 - 305
  • [34] Nucleus model of sacred groves (sacred groves: the nuclei of biodiversity cells) traditional beliefs, myths, associated anthropogenic threats and possible measures of conservation in Western most regions of lesser Himalayas, India
    Ahmed, Mushtaq
    Dhiman, Manjul
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL FRONTIERS, 2024, 44 (02): : 217 - 233