Bottom-up design process of agri-environmental measures at a landscape scale: Evidence from case studies on biodiversity conservation and water protection

被引:33
|
作者
Toderi, Marco [1 ]
Francioni, Matteo [1 ]
Seddaiu, Giovanna [2 ]
Roggero, Pier Paolo [2 ]
Trozzo, Laura [1 ]
D'Ottavio, Paride [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Marche, Dipartimento Sci Agr Alimentari & Ambiental, Via Brecce Blanche, I-60131 Ancona, Italy
[2] Univ Sassari, Dipartimento Agr & Nucleo Ric Desertifcaz, Viale Italia 39, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
关键词
Rural Development Programme; Agri-environmental measures; Spatial scale mismatch; Local knowledge; Co-management; Shift in stakeholder roles; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; MANAGEMENT; POLICY; PARTICIPATION; KNOWLEDGE; SCHEMES; FARMERS; COMANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE; GERMANY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An Agri-environmental measure (AEM) is a payment to farmers to reduce environmental risks or to preserve cultivated landscapes. The single farm scale that is the basis for the AEM has often inhibited the achievement of the environmental goals since many biophysical processes (e.g. soil erosion, water pollution, biodiversity losses) occur at landscape scale. This creates a spatial scale mismatch between the implementation scale of the measures and the ecological processes controlling the target agri-environmental issues. In this paper, we propose how to address this spatial scale mismatch by analysing nine case studies of AEMs implementation at landscape scale concerning biodiversity conservation and water protection. The analysis highlights that the inclusion of the landscape scale in AEMs depends on the level of the involvement of the local stakeholders (SH) in the building process. When the authorities created the space for the SHs to participate in the defining process of AEMs, the inclusion of local knowledge led to the emergence of new landscape and site-specific AEMs which were not previously considered by the autorities. On the contrary, when the SHs were only allowed to choose among the AEMs predefined by the authorities, many site specificity and acceptance issues arose. The creation of space in Rural Development Programmes for collaborative, bottom-up and landscape scale AEMs and the overcoming of institutional constraints in the design of specific actions are the key ingredients for the successful adoption of measures and for enhancing their effectiveness. In this paper, we explore in depth what made these stories successful and provide a framework for the implementation of site-specific and landscape AEMs.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 305
页数:11
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Collaborative approaches at the landscape scale increase the benefits of agri-environmental measures for farmland biodiversity
    Meier, Eliane S.
    Luescher, Gisela
    Herzog, Felix
    Knop, Eva
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 367
  • [2] Farming system modelling for agri-environmental policy design: The case of a spatially non-aggregated allocation of conservation measures
    Bamiere, Laure
    Havlik, Petr
    Jacquet, Florence
    Lherm, Michel
    Millet, Guy
    Bretagnolle, Vincent
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (05) : 891 - 899
  • [3] Spatial Scale Mismatches in the EU Agri-Biodiversity Conservation Policy. The Case for a Shift to Landscape-Scale Design
    Falco, Francesca L.
    Feitelson, Eran
    Dayan, Tamar
    [J]. LAND, 2021, 10 (08)
  • [4] How can bottom-up citizen science restore public trust in environmental governance and sciences? Recommendations from three case studies
    Skarlatidou, Artemis
    Haklay, Muki
    Hoyte, Simon
    van Oudheusden, Michiel
    Bishop, Isabel J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2024, 160
  • [5] Evidence of Incubation of Cue-Induced Craving in Human Individuals with Cocaine Use Disorder: Objective Bottom-Up Measures Diverge from Self-Reports in Support of Preclinical Studies
    Parvaz, Muhammad
    Moeller, Scott
    Goldstein, Rita
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 40 : S421 - S421