Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles:: A retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up

被引:113
|
作者
Malo, Paulo
Nobre, Miguel de Araujo
机构
[1] Clin Malo, Dept Implantol, P-1600042 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Clin Malo, Clin Dent Res Dept, P-1600042 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Branemark implants; long-term; one-stage protocol; retrospective study; short implants;
D O I
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00027.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The use of short implants (7-8.5 mm) has historically been associated with lower survival rates than for longer implants. However, recent clinical studies indicate that short implants may support most prosthetic restorations quite adequately, but still clinical documentation is sparse. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report on the placement of short Branemark implants, testing the hypothesis that short implants in atrophied jaws might give similar long-term implant survival rates as longer implants used in larger bone volumes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective clinical study included 237 consecutively treated patients with 408 short Branemark implants supporting 151 fixed prostheses. One hundred thirty-one of the implants were 7-mm long, and 277 were 8.5-mm long. Final abutments were delivered at the time of surgery, and final prostheses were delivered 4 to 6 months later. Results: One hundred and twenty six of the 7-mm implants (96%) have passed the 1-year follow-up; 110 (84%), the 2-year follow-up; and 88 (67%), the 5-year follow-up. Five implants failed in four patients before the 6-month follow-up, giving a cumulative survival rate of 96.2% at 5 years. The average bone resorption was 1 mm (SD=0.6 mm) after the first year and 1.8 mm (SD=0.8 mm) after the fifth year of function. Two hundred sixty nine of the 8.5-mm implants (97%) have passed the 1-year follow-up; 220 (79%), the 2-year follow-up; and 142 (51%), the 5-year follow-up. Eight implants failed in seven patients before the 6-month follow-up, giving a cumulative survival rate of 97.1% at 5 years. The average bone resorption was 1.3 mm (SD=0.8 mm) after the first year and 2.2 mm (SD=0.9 mm) after the fifth year of function. Conclusions: The cumulative survival rates of 96.2 and 97.1% at 5 years for implants of 7.0- and 8.5-mm length, respectively, indicate that one-stage short Branemark implants used in both jaws is a viable concept.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 21
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of implants placed in autogenous bone grafts and implants placed in native bone: A case-control study with a follow-up of 5-16 years
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Maggetti, Ivano
    Waller, Tobias
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Jung, Ronald E.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (03) : 242 - 249
  • [42] Long-term clinical outcome of dental implants: A retrospective clinical study with a minimum follow-up between 9.5 and 17.7 years
    Goker, F.
    Alicchio, S.
    Colombo, M.
    Bordin, M.
    Tosi, M.
    Colombelli, F.
    Rovati, M.
    Giacomello, M. S.
    Mortellaro, C.
    Lucchina, A. Greco
    Del Fabbro, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 2021, 35 (02): : 37 - 51
  • [43] Posterior maxillary implants inserted with bicortical anchorage and placed in immediate function for partial or complete edentulous rehabilitations. A retrospective clinical study with a median follow-up of 7 years
    Maló P.
    de Araújo Nobre M.
    Lopes A.
    Moss S.
    [J]. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2015, 19 (1) : 19 - 27
  • [44] Clinical and Radio logic Experience with Moderately Rough Oxidized Titanium Implants: Up to 10 Years of Retrospective Follow-up
    Pozzi, Alessandro
    Mura, Priamo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (01) : 152 - 161
  • [45] Palatal Positioning of Implants in Severely Atrophic Edentulous Maxillae: Five-Year Cross-Sectional Retrospective Follow-up Study
    Penarrocha-Oltra, David
    Candel-Marti, Eugenia
    Penarrocha-Diago, Miguel
    Maria Martinez-Gonzalez, Jose
    Manuel Aragoneses, Juan
    Penarrocha-Diago, Maria
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (04) : 1140 - 1146
  • [46] Rehabilitation of oral cancer patients with mandibular implants placed per ablationem : Up to 14 years follow-up
    Korfage, Anke
    Vissink, Arjan
    Roodenburg, Jan L. N.
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Reintsema, Harry
    [J]. ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 49 : S9 - S9
  • [47] Rehabilitation of Edentulous Mandibles by Means of Osseointegrated Implants: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study on One or Two-Stage Surgery, Number of Implants, Implant Surfaces, and Age at Surgery
    Friberg, Bertil
    Jemt, Torsten
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (03) : 413 - 424
  • [48] Clinical performance of LOCATOR (R) attachments: A retrospective study with 1-8 years of follow-up
    Guedat, Christophe
    Nagy, Ursina
    Schimmel, Martin
    Muller, Frauke
    Srinivasan, Murali
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 4 (04): : 132 - 145
  • [49] A retrospective analysis of Osseotite NT implants in clinical practice: 1-year follow-up
    Drago, Carl J.
    Del Castillo, Robert A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2006, 26 (04) : 337 - 345
  • [50] Implants Placed with the All-on-4 Technique: A Radiographic Retrospective Study on 156 Implants with a 5-to 14-Year Follow-up
    Tironi, Francesco
    Orlando, Francesco
    Azzola, Francesco
    Vitelli, Carlo
    Francetti, Luca Angelo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 43 (05) : 606 - 613