Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles:: A retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up

被引:113
|
作者
Malo, Paulo
Nobre, Miguel de Araujo
机构
[1] Clin Malo, Dept Implantol, P-1600042 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Clin Malo, Clin Dent Res Dept, P-1600042 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Branemark implants; long-term; one-stage protocol; retrospective study; short implants;
D O I
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00027.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The use of short implants (7-8.5 mm) has historically been associated with lower survival rates than for longer implants. However, recent clinical studies indicate that short implants may support most prosthetic restorations quite adequately, but still clinical documentation is sparse. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report on the placement of short Branemark implants, testing the hypothesis that short implants in atrophied jaws might give similar long-term implant survival rates as longer implants used in larger bone volumes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective clinical study included 237 consecutively treated patients with 408 short Branemark implants supporting 151 fixed prostheses. One hundred thirty-one of the implants were 7-mm long, and 277 were 8.5-mm long. Final abutments were delivered at the time of surgery, and final prostheses were delivered 4 to 6 months later. Results: One hundred and twenty six of the 7-mm implants (96%) have passed the 1-year follow-up; 110 (84%), the 2-year follow-up; and 88 (67%), the 5-year follow-up. Five implants failed in four patients before the 6-month follow-up, giving a cumulative survival rate of 96.2% at 5 years. The average bone resorption was 1 mm (SD=0.6 mm) after the first year and 1.8 mm (SD=0.8 mm) after the fifth year of function. Two hundred sixty nine of the 8.5-mm implants (97%) have passed the 1-year follow-up; 220 (79%), the 2-year follow-up; and 142 (51%), the 5-year follow-up. Eight implants failed in seven patients before the 6-month follow-up, giving a cumulative survival rate of 97.1% at 5 years. The average bone resorption was 1.3 mm (SD=0.8 mm) after the first year and 2.2 mm (SD=0.9 mm) after the fifth year of function. Conclusions: The cumulative survival rates of 96.2 and 97.1% at 5 years for implants of 7.0- and 8.5-mm length, respectively, indicate that one-stage short Branemark implants used in both jaws is a viable concept.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 21
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A 5-year follow-up study on one-stage implants inserted concomitantly with localized alveolar ridge augmentation
    Juodzbalys, G.
    Raustia, A. M.
    Kubilius, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2007, 34 (10) : 781 - 789
  • [22] Retrospective Study on Immediate Functional Loading of Edentulous Maxillas and Mandibles With 690 Implants, Up to 71 Months of Follow-Up
    Li, William
    Chow, James
    Hui, Edward
    Lee, P. K. M.
    Chow, Raymond
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 67 (12) : 2653 - 2662
  • [23] One-stage anterior cervical decompression and posterior stabilization - A study of one hundred patients with a minimum of two years of follow-up
    McAfee, PC
    Bohlman, HH
    Ducker, TB
    Zeidman, SM
    Goldstein, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1995, 77A (12): : 1791 - 1800
  • [24] Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite™ implants after one-stage surgery:: A 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients
    Friberg, Bertil
    Jemt, Torsten
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [25] Five Years Follow-up of Short Implants Placed in Atrophic Maxilla with Simultaneous Sinus Floor Transcrestal Elevation
    Carelli, Stefano
    Passaretti, Alfredo
    Petroni, Giulia
    Zanza, Alessio
    Testarelli, Luca
    Cicconetti, Andrea
    [J]. ACTA STOMATOLOGICA CROATICA, 2021, 55 (02) : 177 - 185
  • [26] A Retrospective Evaluation of 192 Implants Placed in Augmented Bone: Long-Term Follow-Up Study
    Beretta, Mario
    Cicciu, Marco
    Poli, Pier Paolo
    Rancitelli, Davide
    Bassi, Gianluca
    Grossi, Giovanni Battista
    Maiorana, Carlo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2015, 41 (06) : 669 - 674
  • [27] One-stage versus two-stage technique using two splinted extra-short implants: A multicentric split-mouth study with a one-year follow-up
    Menini, Maria
    Pesce, Paolo
    Delucchi, Francesca
    Ambrogio, Giulia
    Canepa, Camilla
    Carossa, Massimo
    Pera, Francesco
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (05) : 602 - 610
  • [28] Influence of Keratinized Tissue on Short Dental Implants: A Parallel Cohort Retrospective Study on 217 Implants with a Mean Follow-up of 4.1 Years
    Felice, Pietro
    Bonifazi, Lorenzo
    Pistilli, Roberto
    Ferri, Agnese
    Gasparro, Roberta
    Barausse, Carlo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2023, 38 (03) : 462 - 467
  • [29] Long-Term Marginal Bone Loss in 217 Machined-Surface Implants Placed in 68 Patients with 5 to 9 Years of Follow-up: A Retrospective Study
    Mir-Mari, Javier
    Mir-Orfila, Pedro
    Valmaseda-Castellon, Eduard
    Gay-Escoda, Cosme
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2012, 27 (05) : 1163 - 1169
  • [30] Palatal positioned implants in severely atrophic maxillae versus conventional implants to support fixed full-arch prostheses: Controlled retrospective study with 5 years of follow-up
    Candel-Marti, Eugenia
    Penarrocha-Oltra, David
    Bagan, Leticia
    Penarrocha-Diago, Maria
    Penarrocha-Diago, Miguel
    [J]. MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2015, 20 (03): : E357 - E364