Attitudes to participation in a lung cancer screening trial: a qualitative study

被引:70
|
作者
Patel, Deesha [1 ]
Akporobaro, Ajiri [1 ]
Chinyanganya, Nyasha [2 ]
Hackshaw, Allan [3 ,4 ]
Seale, Clive [1 ]
Spiro, Stephen G. [5 ]
Griffiths, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, Blizard Inst, Ctr Primary Care & Publ Hlth, London E1 2AB, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Thorac Med, London, England
[3] UCL, Canc Trials Ctr, London, England
[4] Canc Res UK, London, England
[5] Royal Brompton Hosp, London SW3 6LY, England
关键词
RISK; METAANALYSIS; WORRY;
D O I
10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200055
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Earlier diagnosis of lung cancer is key to reducing mortality. New evidence suggests that smokers have negative attitudes to screening and participation in lung cancer screening trials is poor (<1 in 6 of those eligible). Understanding participation is important since uptake in screening trials is likely to predict uptake in screening programmes. A qualitative study of people accepting and declining participation in the Lung-SEARCH screening trial was conducted. Two questions were addressed: Are the screening methods offered acceptable to patients? Why do some people take part and others decline? Methods The qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 60 respondents from three groups: (a) trial participants providing an annual sputum sample; (b) trial participants with a sputum sample showing abnormal cytology and thus undergoing annual CT scanning and bronchoscopy; and (c) those declining trial participation. Results Most respondents (48/60, 80%) viewed sputum provision, CT scanning and bronchoscopy as largely acceptable. Those declining trial participation described fear of bronchoscopy, inconvenience of travelling to hospitals for screening investigations and perceived themselves as having low susceptibility to lung cancer or being too old to benefit. Patients declining participation discounted their risk from smoking and considered negative family histories and good health to be protective. Four typological behaviours emerged within those declining: 'too old to be bothered', 'worriers', 'fatalists' and 'avoiders'. Conclusion Sputum provision, CT scanning and bronchoscopy are largely acceptable to those participating in a screening trial. However, the decision to participate or decline reflects a complex balance of factors including acceptability and convenience of screening methods, risk perception, altruism and self-interest. Improving practical and changing cognitive aspects of participation will be key to improving uptake of lung cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 425
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Knowledge, attitudes, and practice on second primary cancer screening among cancer survivors: A qualitative study
    Shin, Dong Wook
    Baik, Young Ji
    Kim, Young Woo
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    Chung, Ki-Wook
    Kim, Seok Won
    Lee, Won-Chul
    Yun, Young Ho
    Cho, Juhee
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2011, 85 (01) : 74 - 78
  • [42] African American and Caucasian Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Study
    Warren, Peter R.
    Pankow, Stacie
    Rother, Yvette
    Thompson, Ana
    Wagner, Peggy J.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2023, 28 (01): : 110 - +
  • [43] Lung Cancer Screening: Subsequent Evidences of National Lung Screening Trial
    Park, Young Sik
    [J]. TUBERCULOSIS AND RESPIRATORY DISEASES, 2014, 77 (02) : 55 - 59
  • [44] Burden of cancer trial participation: A qualitative sub-study of the INTERIM feasibility RCT
    Nwolise, Chidiebere
    Corrie, Pippa
    Fitzpatrick, Ray
    Gupta, Avinash
    Jenkinson, Crispin
    Middleton, Mark
    Matin, Rubeta
    [J]. CHRONIC ILLNESS, 2023, 19 (01) : 81 - 94
  • [45] DECIDING ABOUT CLINICAL TRIAL PARTICIPATION: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF ADULTS WITH CANCER AND THEIR DECISION PARTNERS
    Gray, Tamryn
    Allgood, Sarah
    Nolan, Marie
    Gallo, Joseph
    Han, Hae-Ra
    Wenzel, Jennifer
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2020, 47 (02)
  • [46] Clinical Trial Participation: A Qualitative Study of Adolescents and Younger Adults Recently Diagnosed with Cancer
    Mobley, Erin M.
    Thomas, Stefanie M.
    Brailsford, Jennifer
    Ochoa, Carol Y.
    Miller, Kimberly
    Applebaum, Anise
    Milam, Joel
    Freyer, David R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2023, 12 (03) : 303 - 313
  • [47] Controversies about cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study of Roma women's (non)participation in cervical cancer screening in Romania
    Andreassen, Trude
    Weiderpass, Elisabete
    Nicula, Florian
    Suteu, Ofelia
    Itu, Andreea
    Bumbu, Minodora
    Tincu, Aida
    Ursin, Giske
    Moen, Kare
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 183 : 48 - 55
  • [48] The uniqueness of the United Kingdom Lung Cancer Screening trial (UKLS) - a population screening study
    McRonald, F.
    Baldwin, D. R.
    Devaraj, A.
    Brain, K.
    Eisen, T.
    Holeman, J.
    Ledson, M.
    Screaton, N.
    Rintoul, R. C.
    Yadegarfar, G.
    Hands, C.
    Lifford, K.
    Whynes, D.
    Kerr, K. M.
    Page, R.
    Parmar, M.
    Weller, D.
    Williamson, P.
    Hansell, D.
    Duffy, S. W.
    Field, J. K.
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2013, 79 : S28 - S29
  • [49] Pathways to lung cancer diagnosis among individuals who did not receive lung cancer screening: a qualitative study
    Rachel D. McCarty
    Mollie E. Barnard
    Katherine A. Lawson-Michod
    Makelle Owens
    Sarah E. Green
    Samantha Derzon
    Lea Karabegovic
    Wallace L. Akerley
    Melissa H. Watt
    Jennifer A. Doherty
    Laurie Grieshober
    [J]. BMC Primary Care, 24 (1):
  • [50] Pathways to lung cancer diagnosis among individuals who did not receive lung cancer screening: a qualitative study
    McCarty, Rachel D.
    Barnard, Mollie E.
    Lawson-Michod, Katherine A.
    Owens, Makelle
    Green, Sarah E.
    Derzon, Samantha
    Karabegovic, Lea
    Akerley, Wallace L.
    Watt, Melissa H.
    Doherty, Jennifer A.
    Grieshober, Laurie
    [J]. BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2023, 24 (01):