Attitudes to participation in a lung cancer screening trial: a qualitative study

被引:70
|
作者
Patel, Deesha [1 ]
Akporobaro, Ajiri [1 ]
Chinyanganya, Nyasha [2 ]
Hackshaw, Allan [3 ,4 ]
Seale, Clive [1 ]
Spiro, Stephen G. [5 ]
Griffiths, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, Blizard Inst, Ctr Primary Care & Publ Hlth, London E1 2AB, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Thorac Med, London, England
[3] UCL, Canc Trials Ctr, London, England
[4] Canc Res UK, London, England
[5] Royal Brompton Hosp, London SW3 6LY, England
关键词
RISK; METAANALYSIS; WORRY;
D O I
10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200055
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Earlier diagnosis of lung cancer is key to reducing mortality. New evidence suggests that smokers have negative attitudes to screening and participation in lung cancer screening trials is poor (<1 in 6 of those eligible). Understanding participation is important since uptake in screening trials is likely to predict uptake in screening programmes. A qualitative study of people accepting and declining participation in the Lung-SEARCH screening trial was conducted. Two questions were addressed: Are the screening methods offered acceptable to patients? Why do some people take part and others decline? Methods The qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 60 respondents from three groups: (a) trial participants providing an annual sputum sample; (b) trial participants with a sputum sample showing abnormal cytology and thus undergoing annual CT scanning and bronchoscopy; and (c) those declining trial participation. Results Most respondents (48/60, 80%) viewed sputum provision, CT scanning and bronchoscopy as largely acceptable. Those declining trial participation described fear of bronchoscopy, inconvenience of travelling to hospitals for screening investigations and perceived themselves as having low susceptibility to lung cancer or being too old to benefit. Patients declining participation discounted their risk from smoking and considered negative family histories and good health to be protective. Four typological behaviours emerged within those declining: 'too old to be bothered', 'worriers', 'fatalists' and 'avoiders'. Conclusion Sputum provision, CT scanning and bronchoscopy are largely acceptable to those participating in a screening trial. However, the decision to participate or decline reflects a complex balance of factors including acceptability and convenience of screening methods, risk perception, altruism and self-interest. Improving practical and changing cognitive aspects of participation will be key to improving uptake of lung cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 425
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Patients Offered Lung Cancer Screening
    Schweiger, L.
    Golden, S.
    Slatore, C. G.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 203 (09)
  • [22] Barriers and Facilitators to Longitudinal Lung Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Study
    Holman, A. K.
    Kross, E. K.
    Crothers, K. A.
    Cole, A.
    Triplette, M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 203 (09)
  • [23] PATIENT PERCEPTION OF THE HARMS OF LUNG CANCER SCREENING: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Spiegel, Jennifer L.
    Fukunaga, Mayuko Ito
    Lindsay, Ryan
    Patterson, Angela M.
    Fisher, Kimberly
    Pbert, Lori
    Sadasivam, Rajani
    Houston, Thomas K.
    Wiener, Renda
    Mazor, Kathleen
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2021, 55 : S343 - S343
  • [24] A qualitative study exploring patient motivations for screening for lung cancer
    Roth, Joshua A.
    Carter-Harris, Lisa
    Brandzel, Susan
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Wernli, Karen J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [25] BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO LONGITUDINAL LUNG CANCER SCREENING: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Holman, A. K.
    Kross, E. K.
    Crothers, K.
    Cole, A. M.
    Triplette, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 69 (01) : 180 - 180
  • [26] LUNG CANCER SCREENING: A QUALITATIVE STUDY EXPLORING THE DECISION TO OPT OUT OF SCREENING
    Carter-Harris, Lisa
    Brandzel, Susan
    Wernli, Karen J. Wiley
    Roth, Joshua
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 51 : S1038 - S1039
  • [27] Lung Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Decision to Opt Out of Screening
    Carter-Harris, Lisa
    Brandzel, Susan
    Roth, Joshua
    Wernli, Karen
    Buist, Diana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (01) : S580 - S580
  • [28] PREDICTORS OF CANCER PREVENTION ATTITUDES AND PARTICIPATION IN CANCER SCREENING EXAMINATIONS
    BOSTICK, RM
    SPRAFKA, JM
    VIRNIG, BA
    POTTER, JD
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1994, 23 (06) : 816 - 826
  • [29] Lung Cancer Mortality Mortality in the Lung Screening Study Feasibility Trial
    Doroudi, Maryam
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    Marcus, Pamela M.
    [J]. JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM, 2018, 2 (03)
  • [30] Understanding barriers and facilitators to participation in colorectal cancer screening: A French qualitative study
    Le Bonniec, Alice
    Mas, Sebastien
    Preau, Marie
    Cousson-Gelie, Florence
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 26 (12) : 2260 - 2277