Recent progresses on self-incompatibility research in Brassica species

被引:23
|
作者
Watanabe, M
Takayama, S
Isogai, A
Hinata, K
机构
[1] Iwate Univ, Fac Agr, Morioka, Iwate 0208550, Japan
[2] Nara Inst Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Biol Sci, Ikoma, Nara 6300192, Japan
[3] Iwate Biotechnol Res Ctr, Kitakami, Iwate 0240083, Japan
关键词
Brassica species; cell-cell recognition; dominance relationships; self-incompatibility; S haplotype; S locus;
D O I
10.1270/jsbbs.53.199
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Many hermaphrodite plant species have evolved mechanisms to prevent self-fertilization. One such mechanism is self-incompatibility (SI), which is defined as the inability of a fertile hermaphrodite plant to produce zygotes after self-pollination. SI prevents self-fertilization by rejecting pollen from plants with the same genotype. The SI system in Brassica is controlled sporophytically by multiple alleles at a single locus, designated as S, and involves cell-cell communication between male and female. When the S phenotype of the pollen is the same as that of the stigma, pollen germination and/or pollen tube penetration are disturbed on the papilla cells. On the female side, two genes (SLG and SRK) located at the S locus, are involved in the SI reaction. SLG is a secreted glycoprotein expressed abundantly in the papilla cell, and SRK is a membrane-spanning receptor-like serine/threonine kinase whose extracellular domain is highly similar to SLG. Gain-of-function experiments have demonstrated that SRK solely determines S haplotype-specificity of the stigma, while SLG enhances the recognition reaction of SI. The sequence analysis of the S locus genomic region of Brassica campestris (syn. raps) has led to the identification of an anther-specific gene, designated as SP11, which encodes a small cysteine-rich basic protein. Pollination bioassay and gain-of-function experiments have indicated that SPIT is the male S determinant. When the sequence of SP11 was aligned, six cysteine residues were found to be completely conserved among alleles. These conserved cysteine residues could be important for the tertiary structure of SP11. Recent biochemical analysis has suggested that SP11 operates as a sole ligand to activate its cognate SRK specifically. Because the activity of the S allele is controlled sporophytically, dominance relationships influence the ultimate phenotype of both the stigma and pollen. Molecular analysis has demonstrated that the dominance relationships between S alleles in the stigma were determined by SRK itself, but not by the relative expression level. In contrast, in the pollen, the expression of SP11 from the recessive S allele was specifically suppressed in the S heterozygote, suggesting that the dominance relationships in pollen were determined by the expression level of SP11.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 208
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Molecular mechanism of-self-recognition in Brassica self-incompatibility
    Takayama, S
    Isogai, A
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2003, 54 (380) : 149 - 156
  • [32] Mechanism of self/nonself-discrimination in Brassica self-incompatibility
    Kohji Murase
    Yoshitaka Moriwaki
    Tomoyuki Mori
    Xiao Liu
    Chiho Masaka
    Yoshinobu Takada
    Ryoko Maesaki
    Masaki Mishima
    Sota Fujii
    Yoshinori Hirano
    Zen Kawabe
    Koji Nagata
    Tohru Terada
    Go Suzuki
    Masao Watanabe
    Kentaro Shimizu
    Toshio Hakoshima
    Seiji Takayama
    Nature Communications, 11
  • [33] Structure of the male determinant factor for Brassica self-incompatibility
    Mishima, M
    Takayama, S
    Sasaki, K
    Jee, J
    Kojima, C
    Isogai, A
    Shirakawa, M
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 278 (38) : 36389 - 36395
  • [34] Investigating the molecular mechanism of the self-incompatibility response in Brassica
    Cock, JM
    Cabrillac, D
    Giranton, JL
    Pastuglia, M
    Ruffio-Châble, V
    Miege, C
    Dumas, C
    Gaude, T
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2000, 85 : 147 - 153
  • [35] Species Selection Maintains Self-Incompatibility
    Goldberg, Emma E.
    Kohn, Joshua R.
    Lande, Russell
    Robertson, Kelly A.
    Smith, Stephen A.
    Igic, Boris
    SCIENCE, 2010, 330 (6003) : 493 - 495
  • [36] Structural basis for specific self-incompatibility response in Brassica
    Ma, Rui
    Han, Zhifu
    Hu, Zehan
    Lin, Guangzhong
    Gong, Xinqi
    Zhang, Heqiao
    Nasrallah, June B.
    Chai, Jijie
    CELL RESEARCH, 2016, 26 (12) : 1320 - 1329
  • [37] Suppression of self-incompatibility (SI) in Brassica napus.
    Stahl, RJ
    Arnoldo, MA
    Rothstein, SJ
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 114 (03) : 1547 - 1547
  • [38] MOLECULAR ASPECTS OF THE SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY SYSTEMS OF BRASSICA AND NICOTIANA
    GAUDE, T
    DUMAS, C
    BOTANICA ACTA, 1990, 103 (04): : 323 - 326
  • [39] GENOTYPE, PROTEIN, PHENOTYPE RELATIONSHIPS IN SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY OF BRASSICA
    NASRALLAH, ME
    WALLACE, DH
    SAVO, RM
    GENETICS RESEARCH, 1972, 20 (02) : 151 - +
  • [40] Signal perception and response in the interactions of self-incompatibility in Brassica
    Nasrallah, JB
    ESSAYS IN BIOCHEMISTRY, VOL 32, 1997, 1997, 32 : 143 - 160