Recent progresses on self-incompatibility research in Brassica species

被引:23
|
作者
Watanabe, M
Takayama, S
Isogai, A
Hinata, K
机构
[1] Iwate Univ, Fac Agr, Morioka, Iwate 0208550, Japan
[2] Nara Inst Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Biol Sci, Ikoma, Nara 6300192, Japan
[3] Iwate Biotechnol Res Ctr, Kitakami, Iwate 0240083, Japan
关键词
Brassica species; cell-cell recognition; dominance relationships; self-incompatibility; S haplotype; S locus;
D O I
10.1270/jsbbs.53.199
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Many hermaphrodite plant species have evolved mechanisms to prevent self-fertilization. One such mechanism is self-incompatibility (SI), which is defined as the inability of a fertile hermaphrodite plant to produce zygotes after self-pollination. SI prevents self-fertilization by rejecting pollen from plants with the same genotype. The SI system in Brassica is controlled sporophytically by multiple alleles at a single locus, designated as S, and involves cell-cell communication between male and female. When the S phenotype of the pollen is the same as that of the stigma, pollen germination and/or pollen tube penetration are disturbed on the papilla cells. On the female side, two genes (SLG and SRK) located at the S locus, are involved in the SI reaction. SLG is a secreted glycoprotein expressed abundantly in the papilla cell, and SRK is a membrane-spanning receptor-like serine/threonine kinase whose extracellular domain is highly similar to SLG. Gain-of-function experiments have demonstrated that SRK solely determines S haplotype-specificity of the stigma, while SLG enhances the recognition reaction of SI. The sequence analysis of the S locus genomic region of Brassica campestris (syn. raps) has led to the identification of an anther-specific gene, designated as SP11, which encodes a small cysteine-rich basic protein. Pollination bioassay and gain-of-function experiments have indicated that SPIT is the male S determinant. When the sequence of SP11 was aligned, six cysteine residues were found to be completely conserved among alleles. These conserved cysteine residues could be important for the tertiary structure of SP11. Recent biochemical analysis has suggested that SP11 operates as a sole ligand to activate its cognate SRK specifically. Because the activity of the S allele is controlled sporophytically, dominance relationships influence the ultimate phenotype of both the stigma and pollen. Molecular analysis has demonstrated that the dominance relationships between S alleles in the stigma were determined by SRK itself, but not by the relative expression level. In contrast, in the pollen, the expression of SP11 from the recessive S allele was specifically suppressed in the S heterozygote, suggesting that the dominance relationships in pollen were determined by the expression level of SP11.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 208
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Molecular mechanism of self-incompatibility Brassica.
    Shimosato, H
    Takayama, S
    Shiba, H
    Fang-Sik, C
    Iwano, M
    Isogai, A
    PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 43 : S34 - S34
  • [22] DRY STIGMAS, WATER AND SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY IN BRASSICA
    DICKINSON, H
    SEXUAL PLANT REPRODUCTION, 1995, 8 (01): : 1 - 10
  • [23] The pollen determinant of self-incompatibility in Brassica campestris
    Takayama, S
    Shiba, H
    Iwano, M
    Shimosato, H
    Che, FS
    Kai, N
    Watanabe, M
    Suzuki, G
    Hinata, K
    Isogai, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (04) : 1920 - 1925
  • [24] A receptor kinase and the self-incompatibility response in Brassica
    Cock, JM
    ADVANCES IN BOTANICAL RESEARCH INCORPORATING ADVANCES IN PLANT PATHOLOGY, VOL 32: PLANT PROTEIN KINASES, 2000, 32 : 269 - 298
  • [25] MOLECULAR-GENETICS OF SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY IN BRASSICA
    NASRALLAH, JB
    PLANT REPRODUCTION : FROM FLORAL INDUCTION TO POLLINATION, 1989, 1 : 156 - 164
  • [26] IMMUNOGENETICS OF SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY IN BRASSICA OLERACEA L
    NASRALLAH, ME
    WALLACE, DH
    HEREDITY, 1967, 22 : 519 - +
  • [27] Resynthesis of Brassica napus L. for self-incompatibility:: self-incompatibility reaction, inheritance and breeding potential
    Rahman, MH
    PLANT BREEDING, 2005, 124 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [28] Molecular mechanisms of self-recognition in Brassica self-incompatibility
    Brugière, N
    Cui, YH
    Rothstein, SJ
    TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2000, 5 (10) : 432 - 438
  • [29] Molecular Research Progress on Gametophytic Self-Incompatibility in Rosaceae Species
    Coulibaly, Daouda
    Gao, Feng
    Bai, Yang
    Ouma, Kenneth Omondi
    Antwi-Boasiako, Augustine
    Zhou, Pengyu
    Iqbal, Shahid
    Bah, Amadou Apho
    Huang, Xiao
    Diarra, Sabake Tianegue
    Segbo, Silas
    Hayat, Faisal
    Gao, Zhihong
    HORTICULTURAE, 2024, 10 (10)
  • [30] Mechanism of self/nonself-discrimination in Brassica self-incompatibility
    Murase, Kohji
    Moriwaki, Yoshitaka
    Mori, Tomoyuki
    Liu, Xiao
    Masaka, Chiho
    Takada, Yoshinobu
    Maesaki, Ryoko
    Mishima, Masaki
    Fujii, Sota
    Hirano, Yoshinori
    Kawabe, Zen
    Nagata, Koji
    Terada, Tohru
    Suzuki, Go
    Watanabe, Masao
    Shimizu, Kentaro
    Hakoshima, Toshio
    Takayama, Seiji
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)