Syphilis: Understanding Traditional and Reverse Screening Algorithms
被引:2
|
作者:
Thomas, Jacqueline F.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ West Florida, Sch Nursing, Pensacola, FL 32514 USAUniv West Florida, Sch Nursing, Pensacola, FL 32514 USA
Thomas, Jacqueline F.
[1
]
Catlin, Shayria
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Family Hlth, Mobile, AL USAUniv West Florida, Sch Nursing, Pensacola, FL 32514 USA
Catlin, Shayria
[2
]
Stacey, Jonathan A.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ West Florida, Hlth Adm, Pensacola, FL USAUniv West Florida, Sch Nursing, Pensacola, FL 32514 USA
Stacey, Jonathan A.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Univ West Florida, Sch Nursing, Pensacola, FL 32514 USA
[2] Family Hlth, Mobile, AL USA
[3] Univ West Florida, Hlth Adm, Pensacola, FL USA
来源:
JNP-JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS
|
2020年
/
16卷
/
05期
关键词:
nontreponemal;
reverse algorithm;
syphilis;
traditional algorithm;
treponemal;
MANAGEMENT;
D O I:
10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.01.010
中图分类号:
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号:
1011 ;
摘要:
Interpreting syphilis screening tests can be a challenge for health care providers. Clinical laboratories primarily use the reverse algorithm to screen for syphilis; however, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend the traditional algorithm. Both algorithms require the interpretation of 2 different serologic assays for screening and confirmation. Serologic testing used in both algorithms is reviewed for nurse practitioners to correctly interpret test results to establish a timely diagnosis and provide stageappropriate treatment. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机构:
Univ Washington, Dept Neurol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
Univ Washington, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Seattle, WA USAUniv Washington, Dept Neurol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA