Syphilis: Understanding Traditional and Reverse Screening Algorithms

被引：2

作者：

Thomas, Jacqueline F. ^{[1
]}

Catlin, Shayria ^{[2
]}

Stacey, Jonathan A. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ West Florida, Sch Nursing, Pensacola, FL 32514 USA

[2] Family Hlth, Mobile, AL USA

[3] Univ West Florida, Hlth Adm, Pensacola, FL USA

来源：

JNP-JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS | 2020年 / 16卷 / 05期

关键词：

nontreponemal; reverse algorithm; syphilis; traditional algorithm; treponemal; MANAGEMENT;

D O I：

10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.01.010

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

Interpreting syphilis screening tests can be a challenge for health care providers. Clinical laboratories primarily use the reverse algorithm to screen for syphilis; however, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend the traditional algorithm. Both algorithms require the interpretation of 2 different serologic assays for screening and confirmation. Serologic testing used in both algorithms is reviewed for nurse practitioners to correctly interpret test results to establish a timely diagnosis and provide stageappropriate treatment. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：359 / 362

页数：4

共 50 条

[31] SYPHILIS SCREENING
HORTON, RC
NICHOLLS, JE
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1989, 155 : 714 - 715
[32] Syphilis Screening
Friedrich, M. J.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 306 (07): : 694 - 694
[33] Reverse syphilis screening algorithm fails to demonstrate cost effectiveness in persons living with HIV
Eaton, Ellen F.
Joe, Winston
Kilgore, Meredith L.
Muzny, Christina A.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2018, 29 (06) : 563 - 567
[34] Reverse algorithm for screening of syphilis and trends in prevalence among blood donors in Coastal Karnataka
Sangthang, S.
Raturi, M.
Kandsamy, D.
Chenna, D.
Shastry, S.
TRANSFUSION CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2022, 29 (03) : 219 - 223
[35] Reverse Syphilis Testing Compared to Traditional Testing in Pregnancy for Diagnosis of Syphilis in Pregnancy in High Burden Regions: A Cost Effectiveness and Decision Analysis.
Eke, Ahizechukwu C.
Agaku, Israel T.
Eke, Uzoamaka A.
Sheffield, Jeanne
REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2017, 24 : 256A - 256A
[36] Understanding Congenital Syphilis
Porter, Sallie
Qureshi, Rubab
Benenson, Irina
INFANTS & YOUNG CHILDREN, 2018, 31 (04): : 287 - 296
[37] COST ANALYSIS OF LABORATORY TESTING FOR SYPHILIS SCREENING AFTER INSTITUTION OF REVERSE SEQUENCE ALGORITHM IN 2011 IN COMPARISON WITH STANDARD SYPHILIS TESTING IN 2009
Tangham, G.
Choudhary, M.
Tiller, T.
Matthews-Greer, J.
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 61 (02) : 508 - 508
[38] Syphilis detection: evaluation of serological screening and pilot reverse confirmatory assay algorithm in blood donors
Sommese, Linda
Paolillo, Rossella
Sabia, Chiara
Costa, Dario
De Pascale, Maria Rosaria
Iannone, Carmela
Esposito, Antonella
Schiano, Concetta
Napoli, Claudio
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2016, 27 (08) : 644 - 649
[39] Comparative analysis of the Traditional, Reverse and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control algorithms and utilization of WHO NET software for syphilis serodiagnosis in a tertiary care hospital in Chengalpet, South India
Jayachandran, Abirami Lakshmy
Dhanapaul, Sankara
Joshua, Visuvasam
Kandasamy, Balan
JOURNAL OF KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY, 2023, 12 (04) : 58 - 67
[40] ANTENATAL SCREENING FOR SYPHILIS
WRIGHT, DJM
GERKEN, A
BRITISH JOURNAL OF VENEREAL DISEASES, 1981, 57 (02): : 147 - 148

← 1 2 3 4 5 →