Syphilis: Understanding Traditional and Reverse Screening Algorithms

被引:2
|
作者
Thomas, Jacqueline F. [1 ]
Catlin, Shayria [2 ]
Stacey, Jonathan A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ West Florida, Sch Nursing, Pensacola, FL 32514 USA
[2] Family Hlth, Mobile, AL USA
[3] Univ West Florida, Hlth Adm, Pensacola, FL USA
来源
JNP-JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS | 2020年 / 16卷 / 05期
关键词
nontreponemal; reverse algorithm; syphilis; traditional algorithm; treponemal; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.01.010
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Interpreting syphilis screening tests can be a challenge for health care providers. Clinical laboratories primarily use the reverse algorithm to screen for syphilis; however, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend the traditional algorithm. Both algorithms require the interpretation of 2 different serologic assays for screening and confirmation. Serologic testing used in both algorithms is reviewed for nurse practitioners to correctly interpret test results to establish a timely diagnosis and provide stageappropriate treatment. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 362
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Direct Comparison of the Traditional and Reverse Syphilis Screening Algorithms in a Population with a Low Prevalence of Syphilis
    Binnicker, Matthew J.
    Jespersen, Deborah J.
    Rollins, Leonard O.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 50 (01) : 148 - 150
  • [2] Comparison of Traditional and Reverse Syphilis Screening Algorithms in Medical Health Checkups
    Nah, Eun-Hee
    Cho, Seon
    Kim, Suyoung
    Cho, Han-Ik
    Chai, Jong-Yil
    ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 37 (06) : 511 - 515
  • [3] Evaluation of the Elecsys Syphilis electrochemiluminescence immunoassay as a first-line screening test in the reverse algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis
    Lee, Seungjun
    Yu, Hui-Jin
    Lim, Sangeun
    Park, Hyosoon
    Kwon, Min-Jung
    Woo, Hee-Yeon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 80 : 98 - 104
  • [4] Validation of Reverse Sequence Screening for Syphilis
    Lipinsky, Dafna
    Schreiber, Licita
    Kopel, Vered
    Shainberg, Bracha
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 50 (04) : 1501 - 1501
  • [5] The Role of Traditional and Reverse Algorithms in the Diagnosis of Syphilis in HIV-Infected Individuals: A Case Study on Istanbul
    Yapar, Gizem
    Koeksal, Muammer Osman
    Sarsar, Kutay
    Soguksu, Pinar
    Demirci, Mehmet
    Yurtseven, Eray
    Kir, Murat Hakan
    Allahverdiyeva, Aytaj
    Cagatay, Arif Atahan
    Agacfidan, Ali
    Uysal, Hayriye Kirkoyun
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2025, 15 (03)
  • [6] The Traditional or Reverse Algorithm for Diagnosis of Syphilis: Pros and Cons
    Ortiz, Daniel A.
    Shukla, Mayur R.
    Loeffelholz, Michael J.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 71 : S43 - S51
  • [7] PERFORMANCE OF REVERSE SEQUENCE SYPHILIS SCREENING IN JAMAICA
    Hobbs, M.
    Gordon, F.
    Cooper, C. J.
    Eastman, S.
    Hylton-Kong, T.
    Watson-Grant, S.
    Weir, S.
    Figueroa, J. P.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2011, 87 : A70 - A70
  • [8] PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED WITH REVERSE SEQUENCE SYPHILIS SCREENING
    Hoover, K. W.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2011, 87 : A12 - A13
  • [9] The Impact of Analytical Sensitivity on Screening Algorithms for Syphilis
    Zhang, WanMing
    Yen-Lieberman, Belinda
    Means, Cathy
    Kreller, Rob
    Waletzky, Joan
    Daly, Thomas M.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 58 (06) : 1065 - 1066
  • [10] Screening Veterans for Syphilis: Implementation of the Reverse Sequence Algorithm
    Clement, Meredith E.
    Hammouda, Amr
    Park, Lawrence P.
    Maxwell, Jason
    Samoff, Erika
    Sena, Arlene C.
    Joyce, Maria
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 65 (11) : 1930 - 1933