Effects of pharmacist interventions on pain intensity: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:4
|
作者
Veettil, Sajesh K. [1 ]
Darouiche, George [1 ]
Sawangjit, Ratree [2 ]
Cox, Nicholas [1 ]
Lai, Nai Ming [3 ,4 ]
Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmacotherapy, 30 South 2000 East,Rm 4964, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Mahasarakham Univ, Fac Pharm, Dept Clin Pharm, Clin Trials & Evidence Based Syntheses Res Unit C, Kham Riang, Thailand
[3] Taylors Univ, Sch Med, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
[4] Monash Univ Malaysia, Sch Pharm, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
[5] Vet Affairs Salt Lake City Healthcare Syst, IDEAS Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS; PHARMACEUTICAL CARE; CLINICAL PHARMACIST; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; ROLES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.japh.2022.02.015
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Pharmacists can play an important role in pain management. Objective(s): This review aims to summarize the effects of any type of pharmacist intervention, whether led by a pharmacist or in a supportive role, on pain intensity over time in individuals with pain of any etiology. Methods: Three electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched from inception to the end of May 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported the effect of pharmacist interventions on pain intensity. Two reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated study quality. The analyses used a random-effects models and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation to rate the certainty of the evidence. The primary outcome was reduction in pain intensity and presented as standardized mean differences (SMD). Results: Twelve RCTs including 1710 participants were included. Pooled estimate of 12 studies demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in pain intensity compared with control (SMD -0.22 [95% CI -0.31 to -0.12], I-2 = 0%, low certainty). The intervention was more effective when a pharmacist delivered a combination of services comprising educational interventions, medication review, and pharmaceutical care services (SMD -0.24 [95% CI -0.35 to -0.13], I-2 = 0%, moderate certainty). For educational interventions alone, no statistically significant difference was observed (SMD -0.15 [95% CI -0.45 to 0.15], I-2 = 47.6%, low certainty). Pharmacist intervention was also effective in reducing pain intensity for patients with cancer-related pain (SMD -0.76 [95% CI -1.17 to -0.36], I-2 = 0%, moderate certainty). Conclusion: There is some promising evidence to suggest that multicomponent pharmacist interventions including medication review or any other pharmaceutical care services, rather than merely educational interventions, are beneficial in reducing pain intensity, particularly in patients with chronic pain. High-quality RCTs are required to confirm the clinical significance of this findings before advocating for its widespread implication in clinical practice. (C) 2022 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1313 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture for Neck Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fu, Li-Min
    Li, Ju-Tzu
    Wu, Wen-Shuo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2009, 15 (02) : 133 - 145
  • [12] Auriculotherapy for Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Asher, Gary N.
    Jonas, Daniel E.
    Coeytaux, Remy R.
    Reilly, Aimee C.
    Loh, Yen L.
    Motsinger-Reif, Alison A.
    Winham, Stacey J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2010, 16 (10) : 1097 - 1108
  • [13] Are Positive Psychology Interventions Efficacious in Chronic Pain Treatment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Braunwalder, Celine
    Muller, Rachel
    Glisic, Marija
    Fekete, Christine
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (01) : 122 - 136
  • [14] Effects of Flaxseed Interventions on Circulating Inflammatory Biomarkers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Rahimlou, Mehran
    Jahromi, Nasrin Banaie
    Hasanyani, Nazila
    Ahmadi, Amirhossein Ramezani
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2019, 10 (06) : 1108 - 1119
  • [15] EFFECTS OF PHYSIOTHERAPY INTERVENTIONS ON BALANCE IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Paltamaa, Jaana
    Sjogren, Tuulikki
    Peurala, Sinikka H.
    Heinonen, An
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2012, 44 (10) : 811 - 823
  • [16] The Effects of Perioperative Music Interventions in Pediatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    van der Heijden, Marianne J. E.
    Araghi, Sadaf Oliai
    van Dijk, Monique
    Jeekel, Johannes
    Hunink, M. G. Myriam
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [17] Effects of Different Dietary Interventions on Blood Pressure Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Gay, Hawkins C.
    Rao, Shreya G.
    Vaccarino, Viola
    Ali, Mohammed K.
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2016, 67 (04) : 733 - 739
  • [18] Impact of Pharmacist Activities in Patients With Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Bunchuailua, Waranee
    Samprasit, Nathapol
    Kotirum, Surachai
    Kapol, Nattiya
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2022, 56 (05) : 556 - 564
  • [19] Interventions to improve locomotive syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Iwamoto, Yoshitaka
    Imura, Takeshi
    Takahashi, Makoto
    Tanaka, Ryo
    [J]. NAGOYA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 85 (02): : 275 - 288
  • [20] The Effectiveness of Team Reflexivity Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lines, Robin L. J.
    Pietsch, Simon
    Crane, Monique
    Ntoumanis, Nikos
    Temby, Philip
    Graham, Sally
    Gucciardi, Daniel F.
    [J]. SPORT EXERCISE AND PERFORMANCE PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 10 (03) : 438 - 473