A comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility of textile firms in Brazil and China

被引:83
|
作者
Sa de Abreu, Monica Cavalcanti [1 ]
de Castro, Felipe [1 ]
Soares, Francisco de Assis [1 ]
Lazaro da Silva Filho, Jose Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Ceara, FEAAC, Fed Univ Ceara, BR-60020180 Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
关键词
Sustainable development; Emerging economies; Corporate social responsibility; Environmental management; Stakeholder; Textile industry; Brazil; China; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; DETERMINANT FACTORS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PERFORMANCE; CSR; SUSTAINABILITY; GOVERNANCE; DISCLOSURE; SALIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Brazilian and Chinese textile firms are exposed to a highly competitive global market. In both countries, corporate social responsibility encompasses practices related to markets, the workplace, the environment, community relationships and company values. We studied the influence of three variables (country location, firm size and position in the value chain) on the adoption of CSR practices. Our study reveals that CSR was not widely used in textile industries in either China or Brazil. However, Brazilian firms have many more CSR practices in place than Chinese firms suggesting that the country where a firm is located strongly influences CSR adoption. Firm size and position in the value chain also exert significant influence but to a lesser extent than the country variable. We argue that the CSR differences between countries result from the unique historical evolution of their national business systems. This together with the institutional framework of a country affect CSR approaches. In the case of textile firms, coercive isomorphism plays a dominant role in legitimizing CSR. The more transparent and rule-based governance system in Brazil explains the more comprehensive CSR practices. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 126
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implicit and "explicit" CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility
    Matten, Dirk
    Moon, Jeremy
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2008, 33 (02): : 404 - 424
  • [22] TEXTILE PRODUCTION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
    Luque Gonzalez, Arturo
    [J]. DIMENSION EMPRESARIAL, 2019, 17 (01): : 59 - 76
  • [23] Greenwashing and stakeholder theory in China: an empirical evidence of corporate social responsibility and firms performance
    Dagestani, Abd Alwahed
    Alnafrah, Ibrahim
    Smutka, Lubos
    Bilan, Yuriy
    Chen, Pengyu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [24] CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
    Williams, Cynthia A.
    Aguilera, Ruth V.
    [J]. GURUKUL BUSINESS REVIEW-GBR, 2009, 5 : 9 - 22
  • [25] Studying the corporate social responsibility in apparel and textile industry
    Dordevic, Dragoljub B.
    Vukovic, Milovan
    Urosevic, Snezana
    Strbac, Nada
    Vukovic, Aleksandra
    [J]. INDUSTRIA TEXTILA, 2019, 70 (04): : 336 - 341
  • [26] Corporate social responsibility: perceptions of directors in Brazil
    Parente, Tobias Coutinho
    Pinheiro Machado Filho, Claudio Antonio
    [J]. MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2016, 39 (11): : 1472 - 1493
  • [27] Understanding the influence of business strategy in corporate social responsibility: evidence from Chinese firms in Africa
    Getele, Gutama Kusse
    Arrive, Tsitaire Jean
    Xiong Ruoliu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2022, 37 (12) : 2573 - 2586
  • [28] Corporate social responsibility: Formal versus informal firms
    Elgin, Ceyhun
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, : 776 - 783
  • [29] Corporate social responsibility and earnings quality in family firms
    Brahem, Emna
    Depoers, Florence
    Lakhal, Faten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2022, 23 (05) : 1114 - 1134
  • [30] Corporate social responsibility reporting in professional accounting firms
    Duff, Angus
    [J]. BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2016, 48 (01): : 74 - 86