Greenwashing and stakeholder theory in China: an empirical evidence of corporate social responsibility and firms performance

被引:2
|
作者
Dagestani, Abd Alwahed [1 ]
Alnafrah, Ibrahim [2 ]
Smutka, Lubos [3 ]
Bilan, Yuriy [4 ]
Chen, Pengyu [5 ]
机构
[1] South Univ, Sch Business Cent, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
[2] Ural Fed Univ, Grad Sch Econ & Management, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia
[3] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Fac Econ & Management, Dept Trade & Finance, Kamycka 129, Prague 16500, Czech Republic
[4] Rzeszow Univ Technol, Fac Management, Al Powstancow Warszawy 12, PL-35959 Rzeszow, Poland
[5] Inner Mongolia Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hohhot 010021, Inner Mongolia, Peoples R China
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Economic performance; Environmental performance; Heterogeneous stakeholders; Stakeholder theory; G34; Q56; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; CSR DISCLOSURE; GOVERNANCE; INNOVATION; ENTERPRISES; MANAGEMENT; OWNERSHIP; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-024-04849-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Previous research on the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and corporate sustainability remains ambiguous, with limited exploration of stakeholder influence. This study addresses this gap by analyzing data from 14,206 firm-year observations of Chinese manufacturing companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges (2010-2019). To this end, 2SLS and PSM-DID methods were applied to address endogeneity concerns and isolate the causal impact of CSR. The findings of this study reveal a positive impact of CSR on both economic and environmental performance. Moreover, internal stakeholders, including major shareholders, domestic and overseas institutional investors, and employees, act as motivators for sustainable performance. However, the results show that institutional investors may hinder environmental progress. External stakeholders, on the other hand, exert diverse influences. While government, creditors, and suppliers enhance CSR's positive effect on economic performance, government, customers, and peer pressure promote improvements in environmental performance. Notably, internal stakeholders act as primary watchdogs, regulating potential negative behaviors like greenwashing, while external stakeholders tend to overlook them due to stronger emphasis on self-interest. These findings highlight the need for policies that encourage internal stakeholder engagement, address potential conflicts of interest among external stakeholders, and strengthen regulatory frameworks for greenwashing, paving the way for more sustainable corporate practices and improved economic and environmental performance.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in China: an empirical research from Chinese firms
    Chen, Honghui
    Wang, Xiayang
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2011, 11 (04): : 361 - +
  • [2] Effect of corporate social responsibility disclosure on firms' sales performance: A perspective of stakeholder engagement and theory
    Waheed, Abdul
    Yang, Jianhua
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (03) : 559 - 566
  • [3] THE NEXUS BETWEEN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CORPORATE PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
    Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman
    Yu, Zhang
    Golpira, Heris
    Sharif, Arshian
    [J]. LOGFORUM, 2019, 15 (02) : 291 - 303
  • [4] Effect of acquisitions on target firms' stakeholder welfare: Evidence from corporate social responsibility
    Choi, Gunae
    Kim, Tae-Nyun
    [J]. BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW, 2022, 127 (02) : 493 - 529
  • [5] Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence
    Albuquerque, Rui
    Koskinen, Yrjo
    Zhang, Chendi
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (10) : 4451 - 4469
  • [6] Corporate social responsibility and profit volatility: theory and empirical evidence
    Becchetti, Leonardo
    Solferino, Nazaria
    Tessitorey, Maria Elisabetta
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2016, 25 (01) : 49 - 89
  • [7] Stakeholder Engagement and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Performance: International Evidence
    Lopatta, Kerstin
    Jaeschke, Reemda
    Chen, Chen
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 24 (03) : 199 - 209
  • [8] GREENWASHING AS A THREAT FOR CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
    Swiatek-Barylska, Ilona
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT: TRENDS OF MANAGEMENT IN THE CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY, 2016, : 279 - 282
  • [9] Corporate social responsibility and financial performance nexus: Empirical evidence from South African listed firms
    Nyeadi, Joseph Dery
    Ibrahim, Muazu
    Sare, Yakubu Awudu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY, 2018, 9 (03) : 301 - 328
  • [10] Organizational slack and corporate social performance: Empirical evidence from China’s public firms
    Erming Xu
    Hui Yang
    J. Martina Quan
    Yuan Lu
    [J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2015, 32 : 181 - 198