Uncertainty Analysis of Interdependencies in Dynamic Infrastructure Recovery: Applications in Risk-Based Decision Making

被引:34
|
作者
Barker, Kash [1 ]
Haimes, Yacov Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Ind Engn, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Ctr Risk Management Engn Syst, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
关键词
Infrastructure; Risk management; Decision making; Economic models; Disasters; INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL; INOPERABILITY; SENSITIVITY; FRAMEWORK; PREPAREDNESS; PROTECTION; MANAGEMENT; RANKING; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2009)15:4(394)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The development of preparedness strategies for natural and malevolent man-made hazards and approaches with which to compare such investments is fraught with uncertainty. The dynamic inoperability input-output model (DIIM) quantifies the inoperability that propagates through interdependent sectors following a disruptive event and then diminishes with time. This approach has been shown to quantify the efficacy of preparedness strategies for interconnected sectors of the economy. Work presented in this paper strengthens the DIIM with a multiobjective approach-the uncertainty DIIM-that evaluates the inherent uncertainty in the parameters of interdependency and its impact on projected economic loss calculated using the DIIM. Preparedness strategies can then be compared based on projected economic loss and on their sensitivity to changes in the interdependent nature of infrastructure sectors. Additionally, key sector analyses are discussed, where sectors are ranked according to their sensitivity to changes in interdependent relationships. Such enumeration of key sectors allows decision makers to focus on certain sensitive infrastructure sectors for the development of preparedness strategies. The models developed in this paper are illustrated with numerical examples.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 405
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Holistic risk-based environmental decision making: A native perspective
    Arquette, M
    Cole, M
    Cook, K
    LaFrance, B
    Peters, M
    Ransom, J
    Sargent, E
    Smoke, V
    Stairs, A
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 110 : 259 - 264
  • [42] Making a risk-based bid decision for overseas construction projects
    Han, S.H.
    Diekmann, J.E.
    2001, Routledge (19)
  • [43] RISK-BASED DECISION-MAKING BY MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE TEACHERS
    Pratt, Dave
    Levinson, Ralph
    Kent, Phillip
    Yogui, Cristina
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (CERME 7), 2011, : 875 - 884
  • [44] The Parole System at Work: A Study of Risk-based Decision Making
    Sarah Laycock
    Risk Management, 2002, 4 (2) : 63 - 64
  • [45] Operational Risk-Based Decision Making for Wastewater Pipe Management
    Balekelayi, Ngandu
    Tesfamariam, Solomon
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2021, 27 (01)
  • [46] Framework Methodology for Risk-Based Decision Making for Transportation Agencies
    Lin, Yolanda C.
    Paul, Abhishek
    Corotis, Ross B.
    Liel, Abbie B.
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART A-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2015, 1 (03):
  • [47] Risk-based decision making keys LNG terminal siting
    Casada, ML
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2006, 104 (05) : 56 - 60
  • [48] GROUP OFFERS RISK-BASED DECISION-MAKING REFORMS
    EMBER, L
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 1993, 71 (29) : 30 - 31
  • [49] EFFECTS OF FRONTAL TBI ON RISK-BASED DECISION MAKING IN RATS
    Martens, Kris
    Veltri, Lindsay
    Berdar, Noah
    Zhu, Binxing
    Scott, Taylor
    Shaver, Trinity
    Vonder Haar, Cole
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2017, 34 (13) : A86 - A87
  • [50] Money laundering regulation and risk-based decision-making
    Ross, Stuart
    Hannan, Michelle
    JOURNAL OF MONEY LAUNDERING CONTROL, 2007, 10 (01): : 106 - +