Uncertainty Analysis of Interdependencies in Dynamic Infrastructure Recovery: Applications in Risk-Based Decision Making

被引:34
|
作者
Barker, Kash [1 ]
Haimes, Yacov Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Ind Engn, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Ctr Risk Management Engn Syst, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
关键词
Infrastructure; Risk management; Decision making; Economic models; Disasters; INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL; INOPERABILITY; SENSITIVITY; FRAMEWORK; PREPAREDNESS; PROTECTION; MANAGEMENT; RANKING; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2009)15:4(394)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The development of preparedness strategies for natural and malevolent man-made hazards and approaches with which to compare such investments is fraught with uncertainty. The dynamic inoperability input-output model (DIIM) quantifies the inoperability that propagates through interdependent sectors following a disruptive event and then diminishes with time. This approach has been shown to quantify the efficacy of preparedness strategies for interconnected sectors of the economy. Work presented in this paper strengthens the DIIM with a multiobjective approach-the uncertainty DIIM-that evaluates the inherent uncertainty in the parameters of interdependency and its impact on projected economic loss calculated using the DIIM. Preparedness strategies can then be compared based on projected economic loss and on their sensitivity to changes in the interdependent nature of infrastructure sectors. Additionally, key sector analyses are discussed, where sectors are ranked according to their sensitivity to changes in interdependent relationships. Such enumeration of key sectors allows decision makers to focus on certain sensitive infrastructure sectors for the development of preparedness strategies. The models developed in this paper are illustrated with numerical examples.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 405
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Promotion of technical harmonisation on risk-based decision making
    Kirchsteiger, C
    Cojazzi, G
    PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 1497 - 1504
  • [32] Dopaminergic modulation of effort and risk-based decision making
    Ghods-Sharifi, Sarvin
    St. Onge, Jennifer R.
    Floresco, Stan B.
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 31 : S207 - S207
  • [33] RISK-BASED INTEGRITY DECISION MAKING FOR LATERAL PIPING
    Kulhawy, Amanda
    Nemeth, Alex
    Sommer, Garry
    Hassanien, Sherif
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 1, 2018,
  • [34] Infrastructure systems interdependencies and risk informed decision making (RIDM): impact scenario analysis of infrastructure risks induced by natural, technological and intentional hazards
    Stapelberg, Rudolph Frederick
    WMSCI 2007: 11TH WORLD MULTI-CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL IV, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 281 - 287
  • [35] RISK-BASED ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION - DECISION FRAMEWORK AND ROLE OF UNCERTAINTY
    DAKINS, ME
    TOLL, JE
    SMALL, MJ
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1994, 13 (12) : 1907 - 1915
  • [36] A Risk-Based Dynamic Decision-Making Approach for Cybersecurity Protection in Industrial Control Systems
    Qin, Yuanqing
    Zhang, Qi
    Zhou, Chunjie
    Xiong, Naixue
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2020, 50 (10): : 3863 - 3870
  • [37] Dynamic Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Method for Risk-Based Ship Design
    Li, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Xueqian
    Yuan, Yuchao
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (13):
  • [38] Invited Response to Cox's Comment: Improving Risk-Based Decision Making for Terrorism Applications
    Dillon, Robin L.
    Liebe, Robert M.
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2009, 29 (03) : 342 - 343
  • [39] Consequence-Based Decision Making in a Risk-Based Regulated Regime
    Glavan, Corina
    Palaneeswaran, Ekambaram
    ICHEAP12: 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL & PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2015, 43 : 1945 - 1950
  • [40] More Regulators Rely on Risk-Based Decision-Making
    Prabhakaran, Vidhya
    POWER, 2016, 160 (11) : 20 - 20