Multivariate equivalence testing for food safety assessment

被引:3
|
作者
Leday, Gwenael G. R. [1 ]
Engel, Jasper [1 ]
Vossen, Jack H. [2 ]
de Vos, Ric C. H. [3 ]
van der Voet, Hilko [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Biometris, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Plant Breeding, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, NL-6700 Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Wageningen Univ & Res, Business Unit Biosci, Wageningen Plant Res, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Food safety; Genetically modified crops; Equivalence testing; Desired power; Multivariate equivalence test; Untargeted metabolomics; LINEAR-MODELS; HYPOTHESES; VARIABLES; CROPS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.fct.2022.113446
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Products for food and feed derived from genetically modified (GM) crops are only allowed on the market when they are deemed to be safe for human health and the environment. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) performs safety assessment including a comparative approach: the compositional characteristics of a GM genotype are compared to those of reference genotypes that have a history of safe use. Statistical equivalence tests are used to carry out such a comparative assessment. These tests are univariate and therefore only consider one measured variable at a time. Phenotypic data, however, often comprise measurements on multiple variables that must be integrated to arrive at a single decision on acceptance in the regulatory process. The surge of modern molecular phenotyping platforms further challenges this integration, due to the large number of characteristics measured on the plants. This paper presents a new multivariate equivalence test that naturally extends a recently proposed univariate equivalence test and allows to assess equivalence across all variables simultaneously. The proposed test is illustrated on plant compositional data from a field study on maize grain and on untargeted metabolomic data of potato tubers, while its performance is assessed on simulated data.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Testing errors, supplier segregation, and food safety
    Starbird, S. Andrew
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 36 (03) : 325 - 334
  • [32] Global food safety testing products market
    不详
    [J]. FOOD AUSTRALIA, 2011, 63 (1-2): : 38 - 38
  • [33] Food safety issues spur new testing
    Grisham, JL
    [J]. CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 1999, 77 (14) : 20 - 21
  • [34] Biosensor may speed food safety testing
    不详
    [J]. INTECH, 1999, 46 (12) : 26 - +
  • [35] PITTCON® 2002:: Food safety and quality testing
    Scott, FI
    [J]. AMERICAN LABORATORY, 2002, 34 (17) : 20 - 20
  • [36] Nanosensors for food quality and safety assessment
    Kumar, Vineet
    Guleria, Praveen
    Mehta, Surinder Kumar
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2017, 15 (02) : 165 - 177
  • [37] Scientific requirements for the assessment of food safety
    van Dommelen, A
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT MONITOR, 1999, (38) : 2 - +
  • [38] Equivalence Testing Approaches in Genetically Modified Organism Risk Assessment
    van der Voet, Hilko
    Paoletti, Claudia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2019, 67 (49) : 13506 - 13508
  • [39] Recommendations related to the analytical equivalence assessment of gene panel testing
    Nagai, Sumimasa
    Nishihara, Hiroshi
    Suzuki, Takayoshi
    Nishio, Kazuto
    Taniguchi, Hiroya
    Tsuchihara, Katsuya
    Nakamura, Kohei
    Takamatsu, Reika
    Ueno, Toshihide
    Aburatani, Hiroyuki
    Kohno, Takashi
    Kohsaka, Shinji
    [J]. CANCER SCIENCE, 2022, 113 (10) : 3282 - 3290
  • [40] Safety assessment of new food ingredients
    Rodricks, JV
    [J]. FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 50 (03) : 114 - &