A glimpse at the GOCE satellite gravity gradient observations

被引:2
|
作者
Visser, P. N. A. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Delft Inst Earth Observat & Space Syst DEOS, Fac Aerosp Engn, NL-2629 HS Delft, Netherlands
关键词
GOCE; Satellite gravity gradients (SGG); Measurement bandwidth; Gravity field models;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2010.09.015
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Since 30 September 2009, following the launch and in-orbit testing of the most sophisticated gravity mission ever built, the European Space Agency (ESA) GOCE satellite is in 'measurement mode', providing continuous time series of satellite gravity gradient (SGG) observations and GPS satellite-to-satellite tracking (SST) observations. The availability of GPS SST observations allows the precise reconstruction of the GOCE position and thus the precise geolocation of the SGG observations. The SGG observations are based on the differences between observations taken by pairs of accelerometers, which need to be corrected first by applying a so-called calibration matrix and second by subtracting rotational terms (centrifugal and angular accelerations). The GOCE mission is designed to provide SGG observations that are most precise in a bandwidth ranging from 0.005 to 0.1 Hz, equivalent to spatial scales along the satellite flight path of about 80-1600 km. Therefore, the SGG observations need to be bandpass filtered. Two months of GOCE SGG observations covering November and December 2009 (first release by ESA) have been processed and analyzed in the spatial domain by comparison with gradients predicted with state-of-the-art gravity field models (EIGEN-5C and ITG-Grace2010s). The ITG-Grace2010s model displays a high level of consistency with the four SGG components that are designed to be observed precisely, except for the cross-track diagonal component at the low frequency end of the measurement bandwidth (close to 0.005 Hz) for which the differences are about a factor 3 higher. For the EIGEN-5C model, a similar consistency is observed, except for geographical areas where this prior model is considered to be less accurate, such as the Himalayan and Andes mountain ranges, the Indonesian Archipelago and Antarctica. The root-mean-square (RMS) of differences between 1 Hz GOCE SGG observations and those predicted by the prior models is below the signal size for frequencies up to at least 0.04 Hz, indicating the high quality of these observations, and also the models, over a large part of the measurement bandwidth. (C) 2010 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 401
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A GOCE only gravity model GOSG01S and the validation of GOCE related satellite gravity models
    Xinyu Xu
    Yongqi Zhao
    Tilo Reubelt
    Robert Tenzer
    [J]. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2017, 8 (04) : 260 - 272
  • [22] Combined modeling of the Earth's gravity field from GRACE and GOCE satellite observations: a numerical study
    Ditmar, P.
    Liu, X.
    Klees, R.
    Tenzer, R.
    Moore, P.
    [J]. DYNAMIC PLANET: MONITORING AND UNDERSTANDING A DYNAMIC PLANET WITH GEODETIC AND OCEANOGRAPHIC TOOLS, 2007, 130 : 403 - +
  • [23] Torus approach in high degree gravity field model determination from GOCE satellite gradiometry observations
    Liu H.
    Wen H.
    Xu X.
    Zhao Y.
    Cai J.
    [J]. Xu, Xinyu (xyxu@sgg.whu.edu.cn), 1600, SinoMaps Press (49): : 965 - 973
  • [24] A refined model of sedimentary rock cover in the southeastern part of the Congo basin from GOCE gravity and vertical gravity gradient observations
    Martinec, Zdenek
    Fullea, Javier
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2015, 35 : 70 - 87
  • [25] Regularization for the gravity field recovery from GOCE observations
    van Lonkhuyzen, M
    Klees, R
    Bouman, J
    [J]. GRAVITY GEOID AND GEODYNAMICS 2000, 2002, 123 : 117 - 122
  • [26] Approximate analytical formula for standard deviation of the first and second radial derivatives of GOCE satellite radial gravity gradient
    Xu, Tianhe
    He, Kaifei
    [J]. Cehui Xuebao/Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2011, 40 (04): : 416 - 420
  • [27] Rapidly computing satellite gravity gradient observations along orbit from gravity field model
    Xu, Xinyu
    Li, Jiancheng
    Jiang, Weiping
    Zou, Xiancai
    [J]. Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/ Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2009, 34 (02): : 226 - 230
  • [28] Gravity field contribution analysis of GOCE gravitational gradient components
    Weiyong Yi
    Reiner Rummel
    Thomas Gruber
    [J]. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2013, 57 : 174 - 202
  • [29] Pre-processing of the GOCE satellite gravity gradiometry data
    School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China
    不详
    [J]. Wuhan Daxue Xuebao Xinxi Kexue Ban, 2009, 10 (1163-1167): : 1163 - 1167
  • [30] Effect of Crustal Density Structures on GOCE Gravity Gradient Observables
    Tenzer, Robert
    Novak, Pavel
    [J]. TERRESTRIAL ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCES, 2013, 24 (05): : 793 - 807