Evolutionary cycles of cooperation and defection

被引:260
|
作者
Imhof, LA [1 ]
Fudenberg, D
Nowak, MA
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Inst Gesellschafts & Wirtschaftswissensch, Stat Abt, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Econ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Program Evolutionary Dynam, Dept Math, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Dept Organism & Evolutionary Biol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
evolutionary dynamics; finite population; prisoner's dilemma; reciprocity; stochastic process;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0502589102
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The main obstacle for the evolution of cooperation is that natural selection favors defection in most settings. In the repeated prisoner's dilemma, two individuals interact several times, and, in each round, they have a choice between cooperation and defection. We analyze the evolutionary dynamics of three simple strategies for the repeated prisoner's dilemma: always defect (ALLD), always cooperate (ALLC), and tit-for-tat (TFT). We study mutation-selection dynamics in finite populations. Despite ALLD being the only strict Nash equilibrium, we observe evolutionary oscillations among all three strategies. The population cycles from ALLD to TFT to ALLC and back to ALLD. Most surprisingly, the time average of these oscillations can be entirely concentrated on TFT. In contrast to the classical expectation, which is informed by deterministic evolutionary game theory of infinitely large populations, stochastic evolution of finite populations need not choose the strict Nash equilibrium and can therefore favor cooperation over defection.
引用
收藏
页码:10797 / 10800
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of quasi-defection strategy on cooperation evolution in social dilemma
    Pan, Qiuhui
    Wang, Yue
    Chen, Qin
    Gao, Liyan
    He, Mingfeng
    [J]. PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2022, 439
  • [32] The human male socialization strategy set: Cooperation, defection, individualism, and schizotypy
    Price, JS
    Stevens, A
    [J]. EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1998, 19 (01) : 57 - 70
  • [33] Risk is relative: Risk aversion yields cooperation rather than defection in cooperation-friendly environments
    Gloeckner, Andreas
    Hilbig, Benjamin E.
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2012, 19 (03) : 546 - 553
  • [34] Risk is relative: Risk aversion yields cooperation rather than defection in cooperation-friendly environments
    Andreas Glöckner
    Benjamin E. Hilbig
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2012, 19 : 546 - 553
  • [35] Modifying Trust Dynamics through Cooperation and Defection in Evolving Social Networks
    Allodi, Luca
    Chiodi, Luca
    Cremonini, Marco
    [J]. TRUST AND TRUSTWORTHY COMPUTING, TRUST 2011, 2011, 6740 : 131 - 145
  • [36] How the Competitive Altruism Leads to Bistable Homogeneous States of Cooperation or Defection
    Jarynowski, Andrzej
    Gawronski, Przemyslaw
    Kulakowski, Krzysztof
    [J]. PARALLEL PROCESSING AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, PT II, 2012, 7204 : 543 - 550
  • [37] The evolutionary roots of cooperation
    King, Stephanie L.
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (06) : R249 - R251
  • [38] Evolutionary Studies of Cooperation
    Bock, John
    [J]. HUMAN NATURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BIOSOCIAL PERSPECTIVE, 2009, 20 (04): : 351 - 353
  • [39] Evolutionary explanations for cooperation
    West, Stuart A.
    Griffin, Ashleigh S.
    Gardner, Andy
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (16) : R661 - R672
  • [40] The evolutionary stability of cooperation
    Bendor, J
    Swistak, P
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1997, 91 (02) : 290 - 307