Evolutionary cycles of cooperation and defection

被引:260
|
作者
Imhof, LA [1 ]
Fudenberg, D
Nowak, MA
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Inst Gesellschafts & Wirtschaftswissensch, Stat Abt, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Econ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Program Evolutionary Dynam, Dept Math, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Dept Organism & Evolutionary Biol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
evolutionary dynamics; finite population; prisoner's dilemma; reciprocity; stochastic process;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0502589102
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The main obstacle for the evolution of cooperation is that natural selection favors defection in most settings. In the repeated prisoner's dilemma, two individuals interact several times, and, in each round, they have a choice between cooperation and defection. We analyze the evolutionary dynamics of three simple strategies for the repeated prisoner's dilemma: always defect (ALLD), always cooperate (ALLC), and tit-for-tat (TFT). We study mutation-selection dynamics in finite populations. Despite ALLD being the only strict Nash equilibrium, we observe evolutionary oscillations among all three strategies. The population cycles from ALLD to TFT to ALLC and back to ALLD. Most surprisingly, the time average of these oscillations can be entirely concentrated on TFT. In contrast to the classical expectation, which is informed by deterministic evolutionary game theory of infinitely large populations, stochastic evolution of finite populations need not choose the strict Nash equilibrium and can therefore favor cooperation over defection.
引用
收藏
页码:10797 / 10800
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reasons for cooperation and defection in real-world social dilemmas
    Attari, Shahzeen Z.
    Krantz, David H.
    Weber, Elke U.
    [J]. JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2014, 9 (06): : 316 - 334
  • [22] Defection and extortion as unexpected catalysts of unconditional cooperation in structured populations
    Szolnoki, Attila
    Perc, Matjaz
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2014, 4
  • [23] Opting out against defection leads to stable coexistence with cooperation
    Bo-Yu Zhang
    Song-Jia Fan
    Cong Li
    Xiu-Deng Zheng
    Jian-Zhang Bao
    Ross Cressman
    Yi Tao
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 6
  • [24] Who punishes? A note on responses to cooperation and defection across cultures
    Andrews, Talbot M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ECONOMIC SCIENCE ASSOCIATION-JESA, 2024,
  • [25] Promoting cooperation through fast response to defection in spatial games
    Wang, Xu-Wen
    Jiang, Luo-Luo
    Nie, Sen
    Chen, Shi-Ming
    Wang, Bing-Hong
    [J]. NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2016, 18
  • [26] Opting out against defection leads to stable coexistence with cooperation
    Zhang, Bo-Yu
    Fan, Song-Jia
    Li, Cong
    Zheng, Xiu-Deng
    Bao, Jian-Zhang
    Cressman, Ross
    Tao, Yi
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [27] Defection and extortion as unexpected catalysts of unconditional cooperation in structured populations
    Attila Szolnoki
    Matjaž Perc
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 4
  • [28] Reasons for cooperation and defection in real-world social dilemmas
    Attari, Shahzeen Z.
    Krantz, David H.
    Weber, Elke U.
    [J]. JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2014, 9 (04): : 316 - 334
  • [29] Conditions for Cooperation to be More Abundant than Defection in a Hierarchically Structured Population
    Dhaker Kroumi
    Sabin Lessard
    [J]. Dynamic Games and Applications, 2015, 5 : 239 - 262
  • [30] Incentivizing cooperation against a norm of defection: Experimental Evidence from Egypt
    Hassan, Mazen
    Amin, Engi
    Mansour, Sarah
    Voigt, Stefan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 107