Usefulness of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:29
|
作者
Kim, Do Hyun [1 ]
Kim, Yeonji [1 ]
Kim, Sung Won [1 ]
Hwang, Se Hwan [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Bucheon St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Seoul, South Korea
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE | 2021年 / 131卷 / 02期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Oral cancer; sentinel node biopsy; diagnostic accuracy; meta-analysis; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; ELECTIVE NECK DISSECTION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CAVITY CANCER; LONG-TERM; FOLLOW-UP; SPECT-CT; NEGATIVE PATIENTS; DIAGNOSTIC-TEST; FROZEN-SECTION;
D O I
10.1002/lary.28728
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for detecting neck nodal metastasis in early oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) as an alternative to elective neck dissection. Study Design A systematic search for relevant literature was conducted in the PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Methods Two reviewers individually searched the five databases up to November 2019. For studies that met inclusion criteria, data on patient diagnoses were pooled, including true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. Methodological quality was checked with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (version 2) tool. Results In total, 98 observational or retrospective studies were included. The diagnostic odds ratio of SLNB was 326.165 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 231.477-459.587; I-2 = 0%). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.982. Sensitivity was 0.827 (95% CI: 0.804-0.848), and specificity was 0.981 (95% CI: 0.975-0.986). The correlation between sensitivity and the false positive rate was -0.076, which indicates that heterogeneity did not exist. Subgroup analyses were performed with the subgroups reference test type, publication year, and study type. No significant difference was found within the reference test type subgroup. However, differences within the publication year and study type subgroups were significant, where the retrospective study subgroup was significantly more sensitive and specific than the prospective study subgroup. Conclusion Results of this meta-analysis imply that the high specificity of SLNB supports its role as a diagnostic tool for patients with clinical tumor stage (CT)1-2 clinically negative (N0) OSCC. More studies should be done to further verify the results of this study. Level of Evidence 2a Laryngoscope, 2020
引用
收藏
页码:E459 / E465
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy of different sentinel lymph node biopsy protocols in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Suarez Ajuria, Maria
    Gallas Torreira, Mercedes
    Garcia Garcia, Abel
    Marichalar Mendia, Xabier
    Chamorro Petronacci, Cintia M.
    Padin Iruegas, Elena
    Perez Sayans, Mario
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2022, 44 (07): : 1702 - 1714
  • [22] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Davey, Matthew G.
    O'Flaherty, Colm
    Cleere, Eoin F.
    Nohilly, Aoife
    Phelan, James
    Ronane, Evan
    Lowery, Aoife J.
    Kerin, Michael J.
    [J]. BJS OPEN, 2022, 6 (02):
  • [23] The predictive value of cervical lymph node metastasis through sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with oral cancer: A meta-analysis
    Lin, Ren
    Yan, Junjie
    Liu, Weidong
    Fan, Tonghai
    Tang, Liujun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 12 (08) : 256 - 259
  • [24] Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Warren Y. L.
    Dang, Jerry T.
    Modasi, Aryan
    Nasralla, Awrad
    Switzer, Noah J.
    Birch, Daniel
    Turner, Simon R.
    Karmali, Shahzeer
    [J]. GENERAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 68 (09) : 905 - 913
  • [25] Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Mapped With Carbon Nanoparticle Suspensions in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jiang, Yan
    Li, Jiayang
    Chen, Baolin
    Bao, Yuxiang
    Luo, Chengmin
    Luo, Yi
    Li, Taolang
    Lv, Junyuan
    Cheng, Xiaoming
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [26] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-grade endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of performance characteristics
    Marchocki, Zibi
    Cusimano, Maria C.
    Clarfield, Lauren
    Kim, Soyoun Rachel
    Fazelzad, Rouhi
    Espin-Garcia, Osvaldo
    Bouchard-Fortier, Genevieve
    Rossi, Emma C.
    Stewart, Katherine I.
    Soliman, Pamela T.
    How, Jeffrey A.
    Gotlieb, Walter H.
    Holloway, Robert W.
    Ianieri, Manuel M.
    Cabrera, Silvia
    Lim, Yong Kuei
    Ferguson, Sarah E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 225 (04) : 367 - +
  • [27] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Gastric Cancer, an Optimization of Imaging Protocol for Tracer Mapping
    Yuqiang Huang
    Mengting Pan
    Bo Chen
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2021, 45 : 1126 - 1134
  • [28] New techniques versus standard mapping for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nicola Rocco
    Nunzio Velotti
    Martina Pontillo
    Antonio Vitiello
    Giovanna Berardi
    Antonello Accurso
    Stefania Masone
    Mario Musella
    [J]. Updates in Surgery, 2023, 75 : 1699 - 1710
  • [29] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Gastric Cancer, an Optimization of Imaging Protocol for Tracer Mapping
    Huang, Yuqiang
    Pan, Mengting
    Chen, Bo
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 45 (04) : 1126 - 1134
  • [30] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Fluorescein Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer
    Yadav, Sanjay Kumar
    Bharath, S.
    Khadka, Sarada
    Sharma, Dhananjaya
    Jha, Chandan Kumar
    Agarwal, Gaurav
    Singh, Manju
    Srivastava, Anurag
    Goyal, Amit
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (09)