The predictive value of cervical lymph node metastasis through sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with oral cancer: A meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Lin, Ren [1 ]
Yan, Junjie [1 ]
Liu, Weidong [1 ]
Fan, Tonghai [1 ]
Tang, Liujun [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 6, Peoples Hosp Lishui, Dept Stomatol, Lishui 323000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Diagnosis; meta-analysis; oral cancer; sentinel lymph node biopsy; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; NECK; CAVITY; HEAD; OROPHARYNX;
D O I
10.4103/0973-1482.200751
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the predictive value of cervical lymph node metastasis through sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with oral cancer. Materials and Methods: Two authors independently searched the databases of PubMed, Cochrane central register of controlled trials, EMBASE, and CNKI to find the potential suitable diagnostic study related to SLNB. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive likely hood ratio (+LR), negative likely hood ratio (uLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were pooled by Meta-DiSc1.4 software. The publication bias was assessed by funnel plot and line regression test. Results: After electronic searching the related databases, we finally included twenty diagnostic studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, +LR, and DOR were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88u0.94), 1.00 (95% CI: 0.99u1.00), 35.52 (95% CI: 19.19u65.75), and 323.50 (95% CI: 148.27u705.83), respectively, with fixed-effect model. Moreover, the pooled uLR was 0.13 (95% CI: 0.07u0.23) by random-effect model. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of SLNB for cervical lymph node metastasis was 0.99. Conclusion: SLNB had very high sensitivity and specificity for productizing cervical lymph node metastasis in oral cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 259
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cervical cancer: A meta-analysis
    Wu, Yibo
    Li, Zeming
    Wu, Haiyan
    Yu, Jinjin
    [J]. MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 1 (06) : 1025 - 1030
  • [2] Axillary lymph node dissection versus sentinel lymph node biopsy alone for early breast cancer with sentinel node metastasis: A meta-analysis
    Li, C. Z.
    Zhang, P.
    Li, R. W.
    Wu, C. T.
    Zhang, X. P.
    Zhu, H. C.
    [J]. EJSO, 2015, 41 (08): : 958 - 966
  • [3] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis
    Zhang, Xinyue
    Bao, Bingting
    Wang, Sixue
    Yi, Mingyu
    Jiang, Li
    Fang, Xiaoling
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (08): : 2590 - 2600
  • [4] Diagnostic Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Zhen
    Dong, Zhi-Yong
    Chen, Jun-Qiang
    Liu, Jin-Lu
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (05) : 1541 - 1550
  • [5] Diagnostic Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhen Wang
    Zhi-Yong Dong
    Jun-Qiang Chen
    Jin-Lu Liu
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2012, 19 : 1541 - 1550
  • [6] Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer
    Miltenburg, DM
    Miller, C
    Brunicardi, FC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 84 (02) : 138 - 142
  • [7] Predictive factors for non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis
    Kobayashi, N.
    Hanada, H.
    Utsumi, T.
    [J]. EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 8 (03): : 160 - 160
  • [8] Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cervical Cancer
    Deo, S. V. S.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND PAEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 28 (04) : 4 - +
  • [9] Usefulness of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Do Hyun
    Kim, Yeonji
    Kim, Sung Won
    Hwang, Se Hwan
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2021, 131 (02): : E459 - E465
  • [10] Diagnostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis
    Thompson, C. F.
    St John, M. A.
    Lawson, G.
    Grogan, T.
    Elashoff, D.
    Mendelsohn, A. H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2013, 270 (07) : 2115 - 2122