Usefulness of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:29
|
作者
Kim, Do Hyun [1 ]
Kim, Yeonji [1 ]
Kim, Sung Won [1 ]
Hwang, Se Hwan [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Bucheon St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Seoul, South Korea
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE | 2021年 / 131卷 / 02期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Oral cancer; sentinel node biopsy; diagnostic accuracy; meta-analysis; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; ELECTIVE NECK DISSECTION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CAVITY CANCER; LONG-TERM; FOLLOW-UP; SPECT-CT; NEGATIVE PATIENTS; DIAGNOSTIC-TEST; FROZEN-SECTION;
D O I
10.1002/lary.28728
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for detecting neck nodal metastasis in early oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) as an alternative to elective neck dissection. Study Design A systematic search for relevant literature was conducted in the PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Methods Two reviewers individually searched the five databases up to November 2019. For studies that met inclusion criteria, data on patient diagnoses were pooled, including true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. Methodological quality was checked with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (version 2) tool. Results In total, 98 observational or retrospective studies were included. The diagnostic odds ratio of SLNB was 326.165 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 231.477-459.587; I-2 = 0%). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.982. Sensitivity was 0.827 (95% CI: 0.804-0.848), and specificity was 0.981 (95% CI: 0.975-0.986). The correlation between sensitivity and the false positive rate was -0.076, which indicates that heterogeneity did not exist. Subgroup analyses were performed with the subgroups reference test type, publication year, and study type. No significant difference was found within the reference test type subgroup. However, differences within the publication year and study type subgroups were significant, where the retrospective study subgroup was significantly more sensitive and specific than the prospective study subgroup. Conclusion Results of this meta-analysis imply that the high specificity of SLNB supports its role as a diagnostic tool for patients with clinical tumor stage (CT)1-2 clinically negative (N0) OSCC. More studies should be done to further verify the results of this study. Level of Evidence 2a Laryngoscope, 2020
引用
收藏
页码:E459 / E465
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulval cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    C Meads
    A J Sutton
    A N Rosenthal
    S Małysiak
    M Kowalska
    A Zapalska
    E Rogozińska
    P Baldwin
    R Ganesan
    E Borowiack
    P Barton
    T Roberts
    K Khan
    S Sundar
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2014, 110 : 2837 - 2846
  • [2] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulval cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meads, C.
    Sutton, A. J.
    Rosenthal, A. N.
    Malysiak, S.
    Kowalska, M.
    Zapalska, A.
    Rogozinska, E.
    Baldwin, P.
    Ganesan, R.
    Borowiack, E.
    Barton, P.
    Roberts, T.
    Khan, K.
    Sundar, S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 110 (12) : 2837 - 2846
  • [3] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in oral cavity cancer using indocyanine green: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Yongfeng
    Xiao, Qi
    Zou, Weina
    Xia, Chengwan
    Yin, Hongling
    Pu, Yumei
    Wang, Yuxin
    Zhang, Kai
    [J]. CLINICS, 2021, 76
  • [4] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with microinvasive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gojon, H.
    Fawunmi, D.
    Valachis, A.
    [J]. EJSO, 2014, 40 (01): : 5 - 11
  • [5] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar cancer: Systematic review, meta-analysis and guideline recommendations
    Covens, Al
    Vella, Emily T.
    Kennedy, Erin B.
    Reade, Clare J.
    Jimenez, Waldo
    Le, Tien
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 137 (02) : 351 - 361
  • [6] Accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in male breast cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Parpex, Guillaume
    Ottaviani, Marie
    Lorphelin, Henri
    Mezzadri, Matthieu
    Marchand, Eva
    Cahen-Doidy, Laurence
    Benifla, Jean Louis
    Huchon, Cyrille
    Mimoun, Camille
    [J]. BREAST, 2024, 75
  • [7] Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Cordeiro, E.
    Gervais, M.
    Shah, P.
    Hong, N. Look
    Wright, F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 : S123 - S124
  • [8] Systematic review and meta-analysis of sentinel node biopsy in thyroid cancer
    Balasubramanian, S. P.
    Harrison, B. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (03) : 334 - 344
  • [9] Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Fallara, Giuseppe
    Pozzi, Edoardo
    Cakir, Omer Onur
    Tandogdu, Zafer
    Castiglione, Fabio
    Salonia, Andrea
    Alnajjar, Hussain M.
    Muneer, Asif
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2023, 9 (03): : 500 - 512
  • [10] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cervical cancer: A meta-analysis
    Wu, Yibo
    Li, Zeming
    Wu, Haiyan
    Yu, Jinjin
    [J]. MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 1 (06) : 1025 - 1030