Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon for the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis 3-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:89
|
作者
Kufner, Sebastian [1 ]
Cassese, Salvatore [1 ]
Valeskini, Marco [1 ]
Neumann, Franz-Josef [2 ]
Schulz-Schuepke, Stefanie [1 ,3 ]
Hoppmann, Petra [4 ]
Fusaro, Massimiliano [1 ]
Schunkert, Heribert [1 ,3 ]
Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig [3 ,4 ]
Kastrati, Adnan [1 ,3 ]
Byrne, Robert A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klin Herz & Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsch Herzzentrum Munchen, D-80636 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen, Klin Kardiol & Angiol 2, Freiburg, Krozingen, Germany
[3] DZHK German Ctr Cardiovasc Res, Munich, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Med Klin 1, Klinikum Rechts Isar, D-80636 Munich, Germany
关键词
balloon angioplasty; drug-eluting stent restenosis; paclitaxel-eluting balloon; paclitaxel-eluting stent; ISAR-DESIRE; BARE-METAL; ANGIOPLASTY; IMPLANTATION; METAANALYSIS; ANGIOGRAPHY; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.031
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the long-term comparative efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB), paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), or balloon angioplasty (BA) for the treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis. BACKGROUND The optimal treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis remains unknown. Although PEB has shown encouraging results, the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of PEB remains poorly defined. METHODS A total of 402 patients with clinically significant restenosis in limus-eluting stents were randomly assigned to receive PEB (n = 137), PES (n = 131), or BA (n = 134). For this analysis, PEB versus PES and PEB versus BA were compared. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were target lesion revascularization and the composite of death or myocardial infarction. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 3 years, the risk of target lesion revascularization was comparable with PEB versus PES (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91 to 2.33; p = 0.11) and lower with PEB versus BA (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.74; p < 0.001). The risk of death/myocardial infarction tended to be lower with PEB versus PES (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.28 to 1.07; p = 0.08), due to a lower risk of death (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.87; p = 0.02). The risk of death/myocardial infarction was similar with PEB versus BA (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.46 to 2.0; p = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS At 3 years, the use of PEB as compared with PES to treat patients with limus-eluting stent restenosis has similar efficacy and safety. PEB remains superior to BA. The sustained efficacy without trade-off in safety supports the role of PEB as treatment option for patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis. (Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Drug Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis: 3 Treatment Approaches [ISAR-DESIRE 3]; NCT00987324) (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:877 / 884
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloon for the treatment of drug-eluting coronary stent restenosis: A randomized RESTORE trial
    Wong, Yiu Tung Anthony
    Kang, Do-Yoon
    Lee, Jin Bae
    Rha, Seung-Woon
    Hong, Young Joon
    Shin, Eun-Seok
    Her, Sung-Ho
    Nam, Chang Wook
    Chung, Woo-Young
    Kim, Moo Hyun
    Lee, Cheol Hyun
    Lee, Pil Hyung
    Ahn, Jung-Min
    Kang, Soo-Jin
    Lee, Seung-Whan
    Kim, Young-Hak
    Lee, Cheol Whan
    Park, Seong-Wook
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Park, Seung-Jung
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 197 : 35 - 42
  • [22] Cutting balloon combined with paclitaxel-eluting balloon for treatment of in-stent restenosis
    Kong, Junying
    Hou, Jingbo
    Ma, Lijia
    Xing, Lei
    Jia, Haibo
    Liu, Huimin
    Zhang, Shaosong
    Yu, Bo
    Jang, Ik-Kyung
    ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2013, 106 (02) : 79 - 85
  • [23] Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Balloon in Patients with Bare-Metal or Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis
    Berta, Balazs
    Jambrik, Zoltan
    Kohar, Krisztina
    Szabo, Gyorgy
    Ruzsa, Zoltan
    Molnar, Levente
    Barczi, Gyorgy
    Geller, Laszlo
    Becker, David
    Merkely, Bela
    HELLENIC JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 55 (05) : 369 - 377
  • [24] Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis -: A randomized controlled trial
    Kastrati, A
    Mehilli, J
    von Beckerath, N
    Dibra, A
    Hausleiter, J
    Pache, J
    Schühlen, H
    Schmitt, C
    Dirschinger, J
    Schömig, A
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (02): : 165 - 171
  • [25] Paclitaxel-coated balloon for the treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis: subanalysis results from the Valentines I trial
    Loh, Joshua P.
    Stella, Pieter R.
    Sangiorgi, Giuseppe
    Silber, Sigmund
    Stahnke, Stefanie
    von Strandmann, Rembert Pogge
    Torguson, Rebecca
    Waksman, Ron
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2014, 15 (01) : 23 - 28
  • [26] Safety and performance of a Paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: Preliminary results of the Taxus III trial
    Grube, E
    Serruys, PW
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (05) : 58A - 59A
  • [27] COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PACLITAXEL-ELUTING COROFLEXTM PLEASE STENT VERSUS PACLITAXEL-ELUTING STENT IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: THE PIPA RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Kim, Young-Hak
    Kim, Hyun-Sook
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Cheong, Sang-Sig
    Lee, Bong-Ki
    Lee, Seung-Wook
    Lee, Keun
    Lee, Nae-Hee
    Lee, Sang-Gon
    Lee, Chang Hoon
    Hwang, Ki Won
    Park, Gyung-Min
    Kim, Yong-Giun
    Ahn, Jung-Min
    Song, Hae Geun
    Kim, Won-Jang
    Lee, Jong-Young
    Kang, Soo-Jin
    Lee, Seung-Whan
    Lee, Cheol Whan
    Park, Seong-Wook
    Park, Seung-Jung
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (14) : E1837 - E1837
  • [28] COMPARISON OF DRUG-ELUTING STENT VERSUS DRUG-ELUTING BALLOON FOR TREATMENT OF DES-INTRA STENT RESTENOSIS: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED
    Mattei, C.
    Scavelli, F.
    Santucci, A.
    Sclafani, R.
    Notaristefano, S.
    Cavallini, C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2021, 23 (0C) : C59 - C59
  • [29] Comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus drug-eluting stent in patients with in-stent restenosis: Insight from randomized controlled trials
    Mamuti, Wahafu
    Ablimit, Alimjan
    Kelimu, Wumaierjiang
    Rao, Fang
    Jiamali, Abulimiti
    Zhang, Wei
    Pei, Xiaoli
    Zhang, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 179 : 424 - 429
  • [30] THE EFFICACY OF PACLITAXEL-COATED BALLOON FOR DRUG-ELUTING STENT RESTENOSIS LESIONS ACCORDING TO THE RESTENOSIS PATTERNS
    Shimada, Takenobu
    Kadota, Kazushige
    Amano, Hidewo
    Izawa, Yu
    Ichinohe, Tahei
    Kanazawa, Takenori
    Kubo, Shunsuke
    Hyodo, Yusuke
    Miyake, Koshi
    Otsuru, Suguru
    Hasegawa, Daiji
    Habara, Seiji
    Tada, Takeshi
    Tanaka, Hiroyuki
    Fuku, Yasushi
    Katoh, Harumi
    Goto, Tsuyoshi
    Mitsudo, Kazuaki
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (10) : A1613 - A1613