Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon for the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis 3-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:89
|
作者
Kufner, Sebastian [1 ]
Cassese, Salvatore [1 ]
Valeskini, Marco [1 ]
Neumann, Franz-Josef [2 ]
Schulz-Schuepke, Stefanie [1 ,3 ]
Hoppmann, Petra [4 ]
Fusaro, Massimiliano [1 ]
Schunkert, Heribert [1 ,3 ]
Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig [3 ,4 ]
Kastrati, Adnan [1 ,3 ]
Byrne, Robert A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klin Herz & Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsch Herzzentrum Munchen, D-80636 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen, Klin Kardiol & Angiol 2, Freiburg, Krozingen, Germany
[3] DZHK German Ctr Cardiovasc Res, Munich, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Med Klin 1, Klinikum Rechts Isar, D-80636 Munich, Germany
关键词
balloon angioplasty; drug-eluting stent restenosis; paclitaxel-eluting balloon; paclitaxel-eluting stent; ISAR-DESIRE; BARE-METAL; ANGIOPLASTY; IMPLANTATION; METAANALYSIS; ANGIOGRAPHY; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.031
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the long-term comparative efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB), paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), or balloon angioplasty (BA) for the treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis. BACKGROUND The optimal treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis remains unknown. Although PEB has shown encouraging results, the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of PEB remains poorly defined. METHODS A total of 402 patients with clinically significant restenosis in limus-eluting stents were randomly assigned to receive PEB (n = 137), PES (n = 131), or BA (n = 134). For this analysis, PEB versus PES and PEB versus BA were compared. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were target lesion revascularization and the composite of death or myocardial infarction. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 3 years, the risk of target lesion revascularization was comparable with PEB versus PES (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91 to 2.33; p = 0.11) and lower with PEB versus BA (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.74; p < 0.001). The risk of death/myocardial infarction tended to be lower with PEB versus PES (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.28 to 1.07; p = 0.08), due to a lower risk of death (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.87; p = 0.02). The risk of death/myocardial infarction was similar with PEB versus BA (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.46 to 2.0; p = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS At 3 years, the use of PEB as compared with PES to treat patients with limus-eluting stent restenosis has similar efficacy and safety. PEB remains superior to BA. The sustained efficacy without trade-off in safety supports the role of PEB as treatment option for patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis. (Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Drug Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis: 3 Treatment Approaches [ISAR-DESIRE 3]; NCT00987324) (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:877 / 884
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [12] Analysis of the effect of paclitaxel-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting balloon in the treatment of in-stent restenosis
    Cheng, Jiangtao
    Gao, Chuanyu
    Liu, Yuhao
    Wang, Zhongmin
    Zheng, Xiaohui
    Qi, Datun
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 30 (04) : 1521 - 1524
  • [13] Drug-eluting stent versus drug-eluting balloon for in-stent restenosis treatment
    Villanueva Benito, I.
    Solla Ruiz, I.
    Paredes Galan, E.
    Bastos Fernandez, G.
    De Miguel, A.
    Gomez Blazquez, I.
    Ortiz Saez, A.
    Jimenez Diaz, V.
    Baz Alonso, J. A.
    Iniguez Romo, A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 : 490 - 490
  • [14] Long-Term Results from the MAJESTIC Trial of the Eluvia Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for Femoropopliteal Treatment: 3-Year Follow-up
    Mueller-Huelsbeck, Stefan
    Keirse, Koen
    Zeller, Thomas
    Schroe, Herman
    Diaz-Cartelle, Juan
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 40 (12) : 1832 - 1838
  • [15] Long-Term Results from the MAJESTIC Trial of the Eluvia Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for Femoropopliteal Treatment: 3-Year Follow-up
    Stefan Müller-Hülsbeck
    Koen Keirse
    Thomas Zeller
    Herman Schroë
    Juan Diaz-Cartelle
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2017, 40 : 1832 - 1838
  • [16] A Randomized Comparison of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent for the Treatment of Any In-Stent Restenosis The DARE Trial
    Baan, Jan, Jr.
    Claessen, Bimmer E.
    Boerlage-van Dijk, Kirsten
    Vendrik, Jeroen
    van der Schaaf, Rene J.
    Meuwissen, Martijn
    van Royen, Niels
    Gosselink, A. T. Marcel
    van Wely, Marleen H.
    Dirkali, Atilla
    Arkenbout, E. Karin
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    Koch, Karel T.
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Beijk, Marcel A.
    Vis, M. Marije
    Wykrzykowska, Joanna J.
    Piek, Jan J.
    Tijssen, Jan G. P.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 11 (03) : 275 - 283
  • [17] Paclitaxel-eluting balloons, paclitaxel-eluting stents, and balloon angioplasty in patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (ISAR-DESIRE 3): a randomised, open-label trial
    Byrne, Robert A.
    Neumann, Franz-Josef
    Mehilli, Julinda
    Pinieck, Susanne
    Wolff, Britta
    Tiroch, Klaus
    Schulz, Stefanie
    Fusaro, Massimiliano
    Ott, Ilka
    Ibrahim, Tareq
    Hausleiter, Joerg
    Valina, Christian
    Pache, Juergen
    Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
    Massberg, Steffen
    Kastrati, Adnan
    LANCET, 2013, 381 (9865): : 461 - 467
  • [18] Long-term Results of Drug-Eluting Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Refractory Recurrent Carotid In-Stent Restenosis
    Gandini, Roberto
    Del Giudice, Costantino
    Da Ros, Valerio
    Sallustio, Fabrizio
    Altobelli, Simone
    D'Onofrio, Adolfo
    Abrignani, Sergio
    Vasili, Erald
    Stanzione, Paolo
    Simonetti, Giovanni
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2014, 21 (05) : 671 - 677
  • [19] The efficacy and safety of drug-eluting balloons for the treatment of in-stent restenosis as compared with drug-eluting stents and with conventional balloon angioplasty
    Oh, Pyung Chun
    Suh, Soon Yong
    Kang, Woong Chol
    Lee, Kyounghoon
    Han, Seung Hwan
    Ahn, Taehoon
    Shin, Eak Kyun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (03): : 501 - 506
  • [20] Efficacy of drug-eluting balloon versus sirolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of in-stent restenosis
    Cui, Konyong
    Lyu, Shuzheng
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (16) : C112 - C112