Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon for the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis 3-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:89
|
作者
Kufner, Sebastian [1 ]
Cassese, Salvatore [1 ]
Valeskini, Marco [1 ]
Neumann, Franz-Josef [2 ]
Schulz-Schuepke, Stefanie [1 ,3 ]
Hoppmann, Petra [4 ]
Fusaro, Massimiliano [1 ]
Schunkert, Heribert [1 ,3 ]
Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig [3 ,4 ]
Kastrati, Adnan [1 ,3 ]
Byrne, Robert A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klin Herz & Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsch Herzzentrum Munchen, D-80636 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen, Klin Kardiol & Angiol 2, Freiburg, Krozingen, Germany
[3] DZHK German Ctr Cardiovasc Res, Munich, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Med Klin 1, Klinikum Rechts Isar, D-80636 Munich, Germany
关键词
balloon angioplasty; drug-eluting stent restenosis; paclitaxel-eluting balloon; paclitaxel-eluting stent; ISAR-DESIRE; BARE-METAL; ANGIOPLASTY; IMPLANTATION; METAANALYSIS; ANGIOGRAPHY; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.031
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the long-term comparative efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB), paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), or balloon angioplasty (BA) for the treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis. BACKGROUND The optimal treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis remains unknown. Although PEB has shown encouraging results, the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of PEB remains poorly defined. METHODS A total of 402 patients with clinically significant restenosis in limus-eluting stents were randomly assigned to receive PEB (n = 137), PES (n = 131), or BA (n = 134). For this analysis, PEB versus PES and PEB versus BA were compared. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were target lesion revascularization and the composite of death or myocardial infarction. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 3 years, the risk of target lesion revascularization was comparable with PEB versus PES (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91 to 2.33; p = 0.11) and lower with PEB versus BA (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.74; p < 0.001). The risk of death/myocardial infarction tended to be lower with PEB versus PES (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.28 to 1.07; p = 0.08), due to a lower risk of death (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.87; p = 0.02). The risk of death/myocardial infarction was similar with PEB versus BA (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.46 to 2.0; p = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS At 3 years, the use of PEB as compared with PES to treat patients with limus-eluting stent restenosis has similar efficacy and safety. PEB remains superior to BA. The sustained efficacy without trade-off in safety supports the role of PEB as treatment option for patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis. (Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Drug Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis: 3 Treatment Approaches [ISAR-DESIRE 3]; NCT00987324) (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:877 / 884
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis
    Almalla, Mohammad
    Schroeder, Joerg
    Pross, Verena
    Marx, Nikolaus
    Hoffmann, Rainer
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 83 (06) : 881 - 887
  • [2] Long-term results of treatment of in-stent restenosis in aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts with paclitaxel-eluting balloon and paclitaxel eluting stent
    Almalla, M.
    Vogt, F.
    Marx, N.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 1166 - 1167
  • [3] Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Balloon Compared to Drug-Eluting Stent for The Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis (ISR)
    Kim, Myung-Hyun
    Kim, Byeong-Keuk
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (17) : B172 - B172
  • [4] A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis Results From the PEPCAD China ISR Trial
    Xu, Bo
    Gao, Runlin
    Wang, Jian'an
    Yang, Yuejin
    Chen, Shaoliang
    Liu, Bin
    Chen, Fang
    Li, Zhanquan
    Han, Yaling
    Fu, Guosheng
    Zhao, Yelin
    Ge, Junbo
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 7 (02) : 204 - 211
  • [5] Efficacy of Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon Catheter in Patients with Recurrences after Drug-eluting Stent Implantation for In-stent Restenosis
    Habara, Seiji
    Kadota, Kazushige
    Ichinohe, Tahei
    Ozaki, Masatomo
    Kubo, Shunsuke
    Hyodo, Yusuke
    Miyake, Koshi
    Saito, Naoki
    Otsuru, Suguru
    Otsuji, Hideaki
    Hasegawa, Daiji
    Shigemoto, Yoshikazu
    Tada, Takeshi
    Tanaka, Hiroyuki
    Fuku, Yasushi
    Goto, Tsuyoshi
    Mitsudo, Kazuaki
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (17) : B171 - B171
  • [6] Unrestricted use of paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter compared with drug-eluting stent for drug-eluting stent restenosis in routine clinical practice
    Habara, S.
    Kadota, K.
    Otsuru, S.
    Shigemoto, Y.
    Hasegawa, D.
    Tada, T.
    Tanaka, H.
    Fuku, Y.
    Goto, T.
    Mitsudo, K.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 543 - 543
  • [7] Three-year clinical outcomes after treatment of drug-eluting Stent restenosis with paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs. everolimus-eluting stent
    Almalla, M.
    Reith, S.
    Vogt, F.
    Marx, N.
    Schroeder, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 1166 - 1166
  • [8] Impact Of Restenosis Pattern On Angiographical Outcomes After Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Angioplasty For Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis
    Kubo, Shunsuke
    Kadota, Kazushige
    Habara, Seiji
    Tada, Takeshi
    Tanaka, Hiroyuki
    Fuku, Yasushi
    Oka, Naoki
    Katoh, Harumi
    Goto, Tsuyoshi
    Mitsudo, Kazuaki
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (17) : B170 - B170
  • [9] Safety and efficacy of repeat drug-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis
    Cosgrave, J.
    Melzi, G.
    Corbett, S.
    Babic, R.
    Airoldi, F.
    Chieffo, A.
    Montorfano, M.
    Colombo, A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 582 - 582
  • [10] Safety and efficacy of the Essential Pro paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis
    Padilla, Lucio
    Liberman, Federico
    Tello, Jorge
    Rosas, Pablo
    Spaletra, Pablo
    Pedernera, Gustavo
    Mascolo, Pablo
    Ordonez, Santiago
    Santilli, Pablo
    Candiello, Alfonsina
    Cura, Fernando
    Belardi, Jorge
    Lamelas, Pablo
    REC-INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 6 (03): : 166 - 171