Review of modelling energy transitions pathways with application to energy system flexibility

被引:94
|
作者
Bolwig, Simon [1 ]
Bazbauers, Gatis [2 ]
Klitkou, Antje [3 ]
Lund, Peter D. [4 ]
Blumberga, Andra [2 ]
Gravelsins, Armands [2 ]
Blumberga, Dagnija [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Engn Management, Prod Torvet 426, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Riga Tech Univ, Fac Power & Elect Engn, Inst Energy Syst & Environm, Azenes 12-1 St, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
[3] Nord Inst Studies Innovat Res & Educ, POB 2815 Toyen, NO-0608 Oslo, Norway
[4] Aalto Univ, Sch Sci, POB 15100, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland
来源
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Transitions pathways; Socio-technical factors; Sustainable energy systems; Energy system modelling; System dynamics modelling; Energy system flexibility; TEMPORAL DYNAMICS; LOCK-IN; SUSTAINABILITY; TECHNOLOGY; TYPOLOGY; EXPECTATIONS; MECHANISMS; SIMULATION; INNOVATION; ECONOMIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this review is to discuss how quantitative modelling of energy scenarios for sustainable energy transition pathways can be made more realistic by taking into account insights from the socio-technical and related literatures. The proposition is that an enriched modelling approach would focus not just on technology development and deployment, but also on feedback loops, learning processes, policy and governance, behavioural changes, the interlinkages between the energy sector and other economic sectors, and infrastructure development. The review discusses a range of socio-technical concepts with a view to how they can enrich the understanding and modelling of highly complex dynamic systems such as flexible energy systems with high shares of variable renewable energy. In this context, application of system dynamics modelling (SDM) for the analysis of energy transitions is also introduced by describing the differences between SDM and a traditional modelling approach that uses econometric and linear programming methods. A conceptual framework for this type of modelling is provided by using causal loop diagrams. The diagrams illustrate the endogenous approach of SDM - understanding and modelling the structure of a system, which is responsible for its dynamic behaviour. SDM can also capture the co-evolution of economic, policy, technology, and behavioural factors over sufficiently long time periods, which is necessary for the analysis of transition pathway dynamics. In this regard, the review summarises how socio-technical concepts can be approached in SDM and why they are relevant for the analysis of flexibility in energy systems. From a computational point of view, it could be beneficial to combine SDM with technologically detailed energy system optimization models and that could be a way forward for achieving more realistic, non-linear quantitative modelling of sustainable energy transitions.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 452
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Conserved Protein Flexibility And Pathways Of Energy Flow In Enzyme Catalysis
    Ramanathan, Arvind
    Borreguero, Jose
    Langmead, Christopher J.
    Agarwal, Pratul K.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 96 (03) : 71A - 71A
  • [42] Heating system energy flexibility of low-energy residential buildings
    Foteinaki, Kyriaki
    Li, Rongling
    Heller, Alfred
    Rode, Carsten
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 180 : 95 - 108
  • [43] ANALYSIS ON OVERALL ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND FLEXIBILITY OF THERMAL INTEGRATED ENERGY SYSTEM
    Wang, Hui
    Ji, Xiu
    Liao, Xu
    Zhang, Hong
    An, Yinping
    THERMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 27 (2A): : 975 - 981
  • [45] A review of the energy storage system as a part of power system: Modelling, simulation and prospect
    Mao, Shanxiang
    Chen, Junru
    Liu, Muyang
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2024, 233
  • [46] Reviewing energy system modelling of decentralized energy autonomy
    Weinand, Jann Michael
    Scheller, Fabian
    McKenna, Russell
    ENERGY, 2020, 203
  • [47] Modelling Policy Pathways to Maximise Renewable Energy Growth and Investment in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Using OSeMOSYS (Open Source Energy Modelling System)
    Dalder, Jacob
    Oluleye, Gbemi
    Cannone, Carla
    Yeganyan, Rudolf
    Tan, Naomi
    Howells, Mark
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (02)
  • [48] Flexibility in distribution systems - Modelling a thermal-electric multi-energy system in FLEDGE
    Kleinschmidt, Verena
    Troitzsch, Sebastian
    Hamacher, Thomas
    Peric, Vedran
    2021 IEEE PES INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGY EUROPE (ISGT EUROPE 2021), 2021, : 1022 - 1026
  • [49] Rethinking the geography of energy transitions: low carbon energy pathways through energyshed design
    Thomas, Austin
    Erickson, Jon D.
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 74
  • [50] Socially Equitable Energy System Transitions
    Patrizio, Piera
    Pratama, Yoga Wienda
    Mac Dowell, Niall
    JOULE, 2020, 4 (08) : 1700 - 1713