Data-guide for brain deformation in surgery: comparison of linear and nonlinear models

被引:5
|
作者
Hamidian, Hajar [1 ]
Soltanian-Zadeh, Hamid [1 ,2 ]
Faraji-Dana, Reza
Gity, Masoumeh [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, CIPCE, Tehran, Iran
[2] Henry Ford Hosp, Radiol Image Anal Lab, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Tehran, Iran
关键词
INTRAOPERATIVE MR-IMAGES; SOFT BIOLOGICAL TISSUES; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; IN-VIVO; REGISTRATION; GUIDANCE; SHIFT;
D O I
10.1186/1475-925X-9-51
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: Pre-operative imaging devices generate high-resolution images but intra-operative imaging devices generate low-resolution images. To use high-resolution pre-operative images during surgery, they must be deformed to reflect intra-operative geometry of brain. Methods: We employ biomechanical models, guided by low resolution intra-operative images, to determine location of normal and abnormal regions of brain after craniotomy. We also employ finite element methods to discretize and solve the related differential equations. In the process, pre- and intra-operative images are utilized and corresponding points are determined and used to optimize parameters of the models. This paper develops a nonlinear model and compares it with linear models while our previous work developed and compared linear models (mechanical and elastic). Results: Nonlinear model is evaluated and compared with linear models using simulated and real data. Partial validation using intra-operative images indicates that the proposed models reduce the localization error caused by brain deformation after craniotomy. Conclusions: The proposed nonlinear model generates more accurate results than the linear models. When guided by limited intra-operative surface data, it predicts deformation of entire brain. Its execution time is however considerably more than those of linear models.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison between linear and nonlinear prediction models for monitoring of a paperboard machine
    Skoglund, A
    Brundin, A
    Mandenius, CF
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 25 (02) : 197 - 202
  • [32] Comparison of Linear, Nonlinear, Hysteretic, and Probabilistic Models for Magnetorheological Fluid Dampers
    Sandu, Corina
    Southward, Steve
    Richards, Russell
    JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2010, 132 (06):
  • [33] On the unimportance of constitutive models in computing brain deformation for image-guided surgery
    Wittek, Adam
    Hawkins, Trent
    Miller, Karol
    BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY, 2009, 8 (01) : 77 - 84
  • [34] Dynamic comparison of linear and nonlinear models for generic reactive distillation system
    Olanrewaju, MJ
    Al-Arfaj, MA
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2005, 83 (A12): : 1399 - 1409
  • [35] Comparison between linear and nonlinear prediction models for monitoring of a paperboard machine
    Skoglund, A.
    Brundin, A.
    Mandenius, C.-F.
    Chemical Engineering and Technology, 2002, 25 (02): : 197 - 202
  • [36] A MARKETERS GUIDE TO LOG-LINEAR MODELS FOR QUALITATIVE DATA-ANALYSIS
    DESARBO, WS
    HILDEBRAND, DK
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1980, 44 (03) : 40 - 51
  • [37] Data-Driven Identification of Dissipative Linear Models for Nonlinear Systems
    Sivaranjani, S.
    Agarwal, Etika
    Gupta, Vijay
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2022, 67 (09) : 4978 - 4985
  • [38] Linear and Nonlinear Modes and Data Signatures in Dynamic Systems Biology Models
    DiStefano III, Joseph
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (17):
  • [39] Interpreting neural activity through linear and nonlinear models for brain machine interfaces
    Sanchez, JC
    Erdogmus, D
    Rao, Y
    Kim, SP
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4: A NEW BEGINNING FOR HUMAN HEALTH, 2003, 25 : 2160 - 2163
  • [40] DIGITAL COMPARISON OF LINEAR AND NONLINEAR HOT-WIRE DATA EVALUATION
    BRUUN, HH
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS E-SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1976, 9 (01): : 53 - 57