Computerized Residency Interview Scheduling: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Categorical General Surgery Applicants

被引:2
|
作者
Hoops, Heather E. [1 ]
Brasel, Karen J. [1 ]
Stephens, Caroline Q. [1 ]
Anderson, Erin M. [1 ]
LeBlanc, Liane [1 ]
Krishnaswami, Sanjay [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Surg, Mail Code L223,3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd, Portland, OR 97238 USA
关键词
Interview; Applicant; General surgery residency; Online; Scheduling; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.06.001
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Scheduling interviews can be stressful and time-intensive for general surgery applicants and program coordinators. The objectives of this study were to determine whether computerized scheduling program (CSP) would decrease time to schedule interviews, reduce workload for residency coordinators, and improve applicant satisfaction. DESIGN: A prospective randomized controlled trial of 2 interview-scheduling methods was conducted. All categorical general surgery applicants selected to interview for the 2017 match were randomized to either standard e-mail/phone scheduling or CSP using InterviewBroker. Time required to schedule an interview, number of communications, reschedules, withdrawals, and cancellations were all recorded. Additionally, applicants completed a voluntary, anonymous 9-question paper survey on their interview date. The program director and interviewers were blinded to the experimental groups. SETTING: A single general surgery residency program. PARTICIPANTS: Participants in the study included all categorical general surgery applicants selected for an interview in the 2017 match cycle (N = 62 standard group, N = 62 CSP group). RESULTS: The CSP group took less time to schedule interviews (9 minutes vs. 80 minutes; p < 0.01), had fewer e-mail/phone communications (3 vs. 1; p < 0.01), and more total rescheduling events (26 vs. 4; p = 0.03) when compared to the standard group. Survey responses showed that 55% of applicants used CSPs at 5 or fewer other programs. The CSP group reported increased overall satisfaction (80% vs. 56% very satisfied; p = 0.02) and access to preferred interview dates (80% vs. 53% very satisfied; p = 0.02). Overall, 77% of applicants responded that CSPs should be widely adopted among general surgery residency programs. CONCLUSIONS: CSPs expedited interview scheduling, decreased workload for program coordinators, and improved general surgery applicant satisfaction. However, despite the benefits of CSPs for programs and applicants, CSP use is not widespread among general surgery residency programs. Adoption of CSPs by all programs could greatly improve interview-scheduling processes for applicants and programs. ((C) 2018 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 42
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Geographic Placement of Applicants to General Surgery Residency Programs
    D'Orleans, Charles Crepy
    Hechenbleikner, Elizabeth M.
    Papandria, Dominic J.
    Xiao, Kevin
    Patel, Dipan
    Srinivasan, Jahnavi K.
    Chahine, Alfred
    Pettitt, Barbara J.
    Knauer, Eric M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 81 (09) : 1198 - 1202
  • [42] New Heuristics to Stratify Applicants: Predictors of General Surgery Residency Applicant Step 1 Scores
    Lund, Sarah
    D'Angelo, Jonathan
    D'Angelo, Anne-Lise
    Heller, Stephanie
    Stulak, John
    Rivera, Mariela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 79 (02) : 349 - 354
  • [43] Exploring Characteristics of Academic General Surgery Residency Applicants: A Group Concept-Mapping Approach
    Althans, Alison R.
    Thompson, Jessica R.
    Rosas, Scott R.
    Burke, Jessica G.
    Lee, Kenneth K.
    Diego, Emilia J.
    Rosengart, Matthew R.
    Myers, Sara P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 79 (06) : 1342 - 1352
  • [44] Underrepresented Minorities in General Surgery Residency: Analysis of Interviewed Applicants, Residents, and Core Teaching Faculty Discussion
    Brasel, Karen
    Jarman, Benjamin T.
    Stain, Steven C.
    Berry, Cherisse
    De Jong, Steve
    Su, Bailey
    Nelson, Timothy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2020, 231 (01) : 58 - 60
  • [45] The evaluation of clopidogrel use in perioperative general surgery patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Chu, Edward W.
    Chernoguz, Artur
    Divino, Celia M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 211 (06): : 1019 - 1025
  • [46] PILOT RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF SPINAL VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA FOR HIP FRACTURE SURGERY
    Neuman, Mark D.
    Mehta, Samir
    Bannister, Evan R.
    Hesketh, Patrick J.
    Horan, Annamarie D.
    Elkassabany, Nabil M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2016, 64 (12) : 2604 - 2606
  • [47] Computerized Speechreading Training for Deaf Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Pimperton, Hannah
    Kyle, Fiona
    Hulme, Charles
    Harris, Margaret
    Beedie, Indie
    Ralph-Lewis, Amelia
    Worster, Elizabeth
    Rees, Rachel
    Donlan, Chris
    MacSweeney, Mairead
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2019, 62 (08): : 2882 - 2894
  • [48] Computerized Counseling for Folate Knowledge and Use A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Schwarz, Eleanor Bimla
    Sobota, Mindy
    Gonzales, Ralph
    Gerbert, Barbara
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 35 (06) : 568 - 571
  • [49] Evaluation of a computerized contraceptive decision aid: A randomized controlled trial
    Madden, Tessa
    Holttum, Jessica
    Maddipati, Ragini
    Secura, Gina M.
    Nease, Robert F.
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    Politi, Mary C.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2020, 102 (05) : 339 - 345
  • [50] Routine or computerized cardiotocography in severe preeclampsia? A randomized controlled trial
    Steyn, DW
    Odendaal, HJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL INVESTIGATION, 1997, 7 (04): : 166 - 171