Computerized Residency Interview Scheduling: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Categorical General Surgery Applicants

被引:2
|
作者
Hoops, Heather E. [1 ]
Brasel, Karen J. [1 ]
Stephens, Caroline Q. [1 ]
Anderson, Erin M. [1 ]
LeBlanc, Liane [1 ]
Krishnaswami, Sanjay [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Surg, Mail Code L223,3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd, Portland, OR 97238 USA
关键词
Interview; Applicant; General surgery residency; Online; Scheduling; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.06.001
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Scheduling interviews can be stressful and time-intensive for general surgery applicants and program coordinators. The objectives of this study were to determine whether computerized scheduling program (CSP) would decrease time to schedule interviews, reduce workload for residency coordinators, and improve applicant satisfaction. DESIGN: A prospective randomized controlled trial of 2 interview-scheduling methods was conducted. All categorical general surgery applicants selected to interview for the 2017 match were randomized to either standard e-mail/phone scheduling or CSP using InterviewBroker. Time required to schedule an interview, number of communications, reschedules, withdrawals, and cancellations were all recorded. Additionally, applicants completed a voluntary, anonymous 9-question paper survey on their interview date. The program director and interviewers were blinded to the experimental groups. SETTING: A single general surgery residency program. PARTICIPANTS: Participants in the study included all categorical general surgery applicants selected for an interview in the 2017 match cycle (N = 62 standard group, N = 62 CSP group). RESULTS: The CSP group took less time to schedule interviews (9 minutes vs. 80 minutes; p < 0.01), had fewer e-mail/phone communications (3 vs. 1; p < 0.01), and more total rescheduling events (26 vs. 4; p = 0.03) when compared to the standard group. Survey responses showed that 55% of applicants used CSPs at 5 or fewer other programs. The CSP group reported increased overall satisfaction (80% vs. 56% very satisfied; p = 0.02) and access to preferred interview dates (80% vs. 53% very satisfied; p = 0.02). Overall, 77% of applicants responded that CSPs should be widely adopted among general surgery residency programs. CONCLUSIONS: CSPs expedited interview scheduling, decreased workload for program coordinators, and improved general surgery applicant satisfaction. However, despite the benefits of CSPs for programs and applicants, CSP use is not widespread among general surgery residency programs. Adoption of CSPs by all programs could greatly improve interview-scheduling processes for applicants and programs. ((C) 2018 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 42
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preference Signaling for General Surgery Residency: How Should Applicants Use Signaling?
    Rodriguez, Jorge G. Zarate
    Caldwell, Katharine E.
    Donald, Christa M.
    Wise, Paul E.
    Awad, Michael M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 293 : 580 - 586
  • [22] Self-Assessment in General Surgery Applicants: An Insight Into Interview Performance
    Rosenzveig, Alicia
    Raiche, Isabelle
    Fung, Benjamin S. C.
    Gawad, Nada
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 273 : 155 - 160
  • [23] Correction to: The importance of robotic-assisted procedures in residency training to applicants of a community general surgery residency program
    William Krause
    Julio Bird
    Daniel C. Cullinane
    [J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2019, 13 : 383 - 383
  • [24] The EasyTube during general anesthesia for minor surgery A randomized, controlled trial
    Robak, Oliver
    Vaida, Sonia
    Gaitini, Luis
    Thierbach, Andreas
    Urtubia, Ricardo
    Krafft, Peter
    Frass, Michael
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (25)
  • [25] Gender and Letters of Recommendation: A Linguistic Comparison of the Impact of Gender on General Surgery Residency Applicants
    French, Judith C.
    Zolin, Samuel J.
    Lampert, Erika
    Aiello, Alexandra
    Bencsath, Kalman P.
    Ritter, Kaitlin A.
    Strong, Andrew T.
    Lipman, Jeremy M.
    Valente, Michael A.
    Prabhu, Ajita S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 76 (04) : 899 - 905
  • [26] The importance of USMLE step 2 on the screening and selection of applicants for general surgery residency positions
    Khalil, Sarah
    Jose, Joslyn
    Welter, Matthew
    Timmons, Jennifer
    Miller, Lisa
    Elian, Alain
    Munene, Gitonga
    Sawyer, Robert
    Shebrain, Saad
    [J]. HELIYON, 2023, 9 (07)
  • [27] The Predictive Value of Application Variables on the Global Rating of Applicants to a General Surgery Residency Program
    Sharp, Christine
    Plank, Andrea
    Dove, James
    Woll, Nicole
    Hunsinger, Marie
    Morgan, April
    Blansfield, Joseph
    Shabahang, Mohsen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 72 (01) : 148 - 155
  • [28] Personality Testing May Identify Applicants Who Will Become Successful in General Surgery Residency
    Hughes, Byron D.
    Perone, Jennifer A.
    Cummins, Claire B.
    Sommerhalder, Christian
    Tyler, Douglas S.
    Bowen-Jallow, Kanika A.
    Radhakrishnan, Ravi S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 233 : 240 - 248
  • [29] Ethnic/Racial Bias in Medical School Performance Evaluation of General Surgery Residency Applicants
    Polanco-Santana, John C.
    Storino, Alessandra
    Souza-Mota, Lucas
    Gangadharan, Sidhu P.
    Kent, Tara S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 78 (05) : 1524 - 1534
  • [30] Ethnic/Racial Bias in Medical Student Performance Evaluations of General Surgery Residency Applicants
    Santana, John C. Polanco
    Gonzalez, Alessandra Storino
    Mota, Lucas Souza
    Gangadharan, Sidharta P.
    Kent, Tara S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2020, 231 (04) : S244 - S245