Uncertainty analysis of an integrated hydrological model using posterior covariance matrix from automatic calibration

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Haitao [1 ,5 ]
Kinzelbach, Wolfgang [1 ]
Franssen, Harrie-Jan Hendricks [2 ]
Brunner, Philip [3 ]
Von Boetticher, Albrecht [4 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Inst Environm Engn IfU, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Chem & Dynm Geosphere, D-52425 Julich, Germany
[3] Univ Neuchatel, Ctr Hydrogeol Geotherm, CH-2009 Neuchatel, Switzerland
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[5] China Inst Geo Environm Monitoring, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
uncertainty analysis; integrated hydrological model; posterior covariance matrix; random generation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study quantifies the output uncertainties of an integrated hydrological model in the Yanqi Basin, Xinjiang, China. Two cases of model calibration were carried out: Case 1 used four parameters for calibration; Case 2: added fifteen more parameters for calibration. In both cases, hydraulic heads and evaporation patterns from NOAA images were used as conditioning information. In Case 1. no pair of adjustable parameters is highly correlated (highest R: 0.48). In Case 2, several pairs of adjustable parameters are highly correlated (highest R: 0.79). To analyse uncertainty, 5000 parameter realizations were generated using the optimized values and posterior covariance matrix from the model calibration cases. The impact of parameter uncertainty on seven selected model predictions is evaluated. The results show that the uncertainty is underestimated in Case 1. Therefore, it is advisable to include as many as possible adjustable parameters in the model calibration for parameter uncertainty analysis. In this way, it allows scanning of a much larger space of feasible solutions, although generally the calibration tries to use the "parsimony" principle.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimizing neural model templates using covariance matrix adaptation and Fourier analysis
    Bush, K
    Knight, J
    Anderson, C
    Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Vols 1-5, 2005, : 2162 - 2166
  • [42] Calibration and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model using Genetic Algorithms and Bayesian Model Averaging
    Zhang, Xuesong
    Srinivasan, Raghavan
    Bosch, David
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2009, 374 (3-4) : 307 - 317
  • [43] Model calibration and uncertainty analysis in signaling networks
    Heinemann, Tim
    Raue, Andreas
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 39 : 143 - 149
  • [44] Responses of hydrological model equifinality, uncertainty, and performance to multi-objective parameter calibration
    Her, Younggu
    Seong, Chounghyun
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2018, 20 (04) : 864 - 885
  • [45] Automatic model calibration using a universal approximator
    Torfs, P
    Bier, G
    CALIBRATION AND RELIABILITY IN GROUNDWATER MODELLING: COPING WITH UNCERTAINTY, 2000, (265): : 236 - 242
  • [46] Automatic calibration of the groundwater simulation model with high parameter dimensionality using sequential uncertainty fitting approach
    Masoumi, Fariborz
    Najjar-Ghabel, Saeid
    Safarzadeh, Akbar
    Sadaghat, Behnam
    WATER SUPPLY, 2020, 20 (08) : 3487 - 3501
  • [47] Towards hydrological model calibration using river level measurements
    Jian, Jie
    Ryu, Dongryeol
    Costelloe, Justin F.
    Su, Chun-Hsu
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2017, 10 : 95 - 109
  • [48] The covariance matrix of the Potts model: A random cluster analysis
    Borgs, C
    Chayes, JT
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 82 (5-6) : 1235 - 1297
  • [49] Uncertainty quantization of meteorological input and model parameters for hydrological modelling using a Bayesian-based integrated approach
    Yan, Xueman
    Song, Jinxi
    An, Yongkai
    Lu, Wenxi
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2024, 38 (01)
  • [50] Study on Uncertainty Analysis Method of Fast Reactor Based on Covariance Matrix Sampling
    Zhu R.
    Ma X.
    Wang D.
    Zhang B.
    Peng X.
    Wang L.
    Hedongli Gongcheng/Nuclear Power Engineering, 2021, 42 (05): : 81 - 85