Quantifying the Non-Use Value of Biodiversity in Cost-Benefit Analysis: The Dutch Biodiversity Points

被引:2
|
作者
Bos, Frits [1 ]
Ruijs, Arjan [2 ]
机构
[1] CPB Netherlands Bur Econ Policy Anal, The Hague, Netherlands
[2] ACTIAM Sustainable Asset Management, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
biodiversity; cost-benefit analysis; ecological points method; ecosystem services; habitat equivalence analysis; infrastructure; natural capital; threat-weighted ecological quality area method; water management; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ECONOMIC VALUATION; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1017/bca.2020.27
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Biodiversity points are a quantitative measure for biodiversity. For over a decade, biodiversity points are being applied in the Netherlands for measuring the impact of roads, enclosure dams, and other water management projects on the non-use value of biodiversity. Biodiversity points are quite similar to the quality-adjusted life years used for cost-effectiveness analysis of healthcare treatments. Biodiversity points can be calculated by multiplying the size of the ecotope (e.g., number of hectare), the ecological quality of the ecotope (0-100 %), and the ecological scarcity of each type of ecotope. For many infrastructure projects, the impact on the non-use value of biodiversity can be a principal purpose or a major co-benefit or trade-off, for example, for a park, a fish sluice, a road, an ecoduct, an enclosure dam, or a marine protected area. Biodiversity points are a simple, transparent, and standardized way to aggregate and quantify the qualitative or ordinal assessments by ecological experts. For measuring the non-use value of biodiversity, they are also more informative than valuation by revealed or stated preferences methods. This paper provides the first overview of the application of this method in the Dutch practice of cost-benefit analysis. It also discusses its merits and limitations. The calculation and use of biodiversity points are illustrated by four case studies.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 312
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A COST-BENEFIT STUDY OF THE USE OF GC/MS ANALYSIS BY UNDERGRADUATES
    HANCOCK, JEH
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1987, 194 : 45 - CHED
  • [32] The use of cost-benefit analysis in road assessments: a methodological inquiry
    Vecino-Ortiz, Andres I.
    Hyder, Adnan A.
    [J]. INJURY PREVENTION, 2014, 20 (01) : 50 - 53
  • [33] Application of a Cost-benefit Analysis Model to the Use of Flame Retardants
    McNamee, Margaret Simonson
    Andersson, Petra
    [J]. FIRE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 51 (01) : 67 - 83
  • [34] Cost-benefit analysis of the use of TBT: the case for a treatment approach
    Abbott, A
    Abel, PD
    Arnold, DW
    Milne, A
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 258 (1-2) : 5 - 19
  • [35] Cost-benefit analysis of local land use allocation decisions
    McDonald, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2001, 41 (02) : 277 - 299
  • [36] Cost-benefit analysis of overhead lift use peer coaching
    Lahiri, Supriya
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 73 (07) : 427 - 428
  • [37] Public Transport Authorities' use of Cost-Benefit Analysis in practice
    Vigren, Andreas
    Ljungberg, Anders
    [J]. RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS, 2018, 69 : 560 - 567
  • [38] Cost-benefit analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitors: Is the price worth their value?
    Merchant, Yash P.
    Mehta, Vini
    Shamim, Muhammad Aaqib
    Shah, Ankit
    Shetty, Rathan
    [J]. ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 146
  • [39] Cost-benefit analysis of residential sprinklers - Application of a judgement value method
    Hopkin, Danny
    Spearpoint, Michael
    Arnott, Matthew
    Van Coile, Ruben
    [J]. FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2019, 106 : 61 - 71
  • [40] Cost-benefit analysis of climate change dynamics: uncertainties and the value of information
    Rabl, Ari
    van der Zwaan, Bob
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2009, 96 (03) : 313 - 333