Quantifying the Non-Use Value of Biodiversity in Cost-Benefit Analysis: The Dutch Biodiversity Points

被引:2
|
作者
Bos, Frits [1 ]
Ruijs, Arjan [2 ]
机构
[1] CPB Netherlands Bur Econ Policy Anal, The Hague, Netherlands
[2] ACTIAM Sustainable Asset Management, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
biodiversity; cost-benefit analysis; ecological points method; ecosystem services; habitat equivalence analysis; infrastructure; natural capital; threat-weighted ecological quality area method; water management; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ECONOMIC VALUATION; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1017/bca.2020.27
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Biodiversity points are a quantitative measure for biodiversity. For over a decade, biodiversity points are being applied in the Netherlands for measuring the impact of roads, enclosure dams, and other water management projects on the non-use value of biodiversity. Biodiversity points are quite similar to the quality-adjusted life years used for cost-effectiveness analysis of healthcare treatments. Biodiversity points can be calculated by multiplying the size of the ecotope (e.g., number of hectare), the ecological quality of the ecotope (0-100 %), and the ecological scarcity of each type of ecotope. For many infrastructure projects, the impact on the non-use value of biodiversity can be a principal purpose or a major co-benefit or trade-off, for example, for a park, a fish sluice, a road, an ecoduct, an enclosure dam, or a marine protected area. Biodiversity points are a simple, transparent, and standardized way to aggregate and quantify the qualitative or ordinal assessments by ecological experts. For measuring the non-use value of biodiversity, they are also more informative than valuation by revealed or stated preferences methods. This paper provides the first overview of the application of this method in the Dutch practice of cost-benefit analysis. It also discusses its merits and limitations. The calculation and use of biodiversity points are illustrated by four case studies.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 312
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Some Norwegian politicians' use of cost-benefit analysis
    Nyborg, K
    [J]. PUBLIC CHOICE, 1998, 95 (3-4) : 381 - 401
  • [22] Cost-benefit analysis in CNS education: An opportunity for demonstrating value
    Kalman, Melanie
    [J]. CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALIST, 2007, 21 (02) : 114 - 114
  • [23] Quantifying biodiversity footprints of Dutch economic sectors: A global supply-chain analysis
    Wilting, Harry C.
    van Oorschot, Mark M. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 156 : 194 - 202
  • [24] Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Understand the Value of Social Interventions
    Lee, Stephanie
    Aos, Steve
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2011, 21 (06) : 682 - 688
  • [25] Communicating Value in Simulation: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Return on Investment
    Asche, Carl V.
    Kim, Minchul
    Brown, Alisha
    Golden, Antoinette
    Laack, Torrey A.
    Rosario, Javier
    Strother, Christopher
    Totten, Vicken Y.
    Okuda, Yasuharu
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 25 (02) : 230 - 237
  • [26] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR DETERMINING VALUE OF AN ELECTRONIC SECURITY SYSTEM
    BOMMER, M
    FORD, B
    [J]. COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 1974, 35 (04): : 270 - 279
  • [27] Cost-benefit analysis of the Zonal Program of Castro Verde (Portugal): Highlighting the trade-off between biodiversity and soil conservation
    Marta-Pedroso, Cristina
    Domingos, Tiago
    Freitas, Helena
    de Groot, Rudolf S.
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2007, 97 (01): : 79 - 90
  • [28] Are biodiversity losses valued differently when they are caused by human activities? A meta-analysis of the non-use valuation literature
    Nobel, Anne
    Lizin, Sebastien
    Brouwer, Roy
    Bruns, Stephan B.
    Stern, David, I
    Malina, Robert
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (07)
  • [29] Comparative analysis of services from soft open points using cost-benefit analysis
    Deakin, Matthew
    Sarantakos, Ilias
    Greenwood, David
    Bialek, Janusz
    Taylor, Phil C.
    Walker, Sara
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 333
  • [30] An implicit price of a DALY for use in a cost-benefit analysis of ARVs
    Brent, Robert J.
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2011, 43 (11) : 1413 - 1421