Bisphosphonate rescue in distraction osteogenesis - A case series

被引:27
|
作者
Kiely, Patrick [1 ]
Ward, Kate [1 ]
Bellemore, Michael C. [1 ]
Briody, Julie [2 ]
Cowell, Christopher T. [3 ]
Little, David G. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Westmead, Dept Orthopaed, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[2] Childrens Hosp Westmead, Dept Nucl Med, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[3] Childrens Hosp Westmead, Inst Endocrinol & Diabet, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Fac Med, Dept Paediat & Child Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
bisphosphonate; bone morphogenetic protein; bone resorption; distraction osteogenesis; osteopenia;
D O I
10.1097/01.bpb.0000271326.41363.d1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Distraction osteogenesis is a powerful stimulus for new bone (and tissue) generation (anabolism). Biomechanical stimulation by distraction of the regenerate region results in a high rate of tissue and bone production. However, catabolism (bone resorption) can also occur, the process potentially accentuated in a stress-shielded environment of an external fixator. Regenerate insufficiency can result in regenerate bending or fracture after frame removal. Experimental evidence has demonstrated that bisphosphonates may mediate improved local limb bone mineral density (BMD) and regenerate strength in animal models. Seven patients who had undergone limb lengthening using an Ilizarov device were found to have regenerate insufficiency. Poor regenerate quality led to consideration for intervention. With informed consent, patients received a therapeutic regime of intravenous pamidronate (n = 3) or zoledronic acid (n = 4). The mean age was 13.8 years (SID, +/- 3.6 years), with a minimum follow-up period of 4 months after fixator removal. The sites of regenerate insufficiency were the proximal tibia (n = 6) and the distal femur (n = 1). The mean time interval in the fixator before bisphosphonate treatment was 170 days (range, 124-252 days), with an average length increase of 4.8 cm (SD, +/- 1.1 cm). At time of intravenous bisphosphonate treatment, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements demonstrated a reduced BMD (mean, 62.1%; SD, +/- 12.6%) in the bone adjacent to the lengthening site of the nonoperated side. Mean healing index was high at 79.6 days/cm (range, 64.4-108.0 days/cm), reflecting the observed regenerate insufficiency. No significant systemic complications were encountered. Six of the patient's fixators were removed without requirement for other intervention, demonstrating a rapid and sustained improvement in local BMD, increasing to a mean of 85.6% (SD, +/- 13.3%) of the healthy side. One patient did not respond and subsequently heated after percutaneous osteogenic protein 1 (bone morphogenetic protein 7) and bone marrow injection. Most failed regenerate cases maintain some underlying anabolic activity and can be treated successfully with bisphosphonate therapy, which reduces catabolism. Only 1 case required percutaneous administration of an anabolic therapy to achieve union. These minimally invasive approaches may lessen the need for surgery in a group where significant surgical reintervention could otherwise be required.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 471
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The use of distraction osteogenesis for the correction of craniofacial anomalies - Distraction osteogenesis: a review
    Kindelan, J
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1998, 185 (09) : 459 - 459
  • [32] EXPRESSION OF OSTEOGENESIS RELATED FACTORS ACCORDING TO DISTRACTION RATE IN THE DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS
    Jee, Yu-Jin
    Kim, Yeo-Gab
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2008, 34 (03) : 250 - 265
  • [33] Piezoelectric and Conventional Osteotomy in Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis in a Series of 17 Patients
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Alberto
    Diniz-Freitas, Marcio
    Somoza-Martin, Manuel
    Garcia-Garcia, Abel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2008, 23 (05) : 891 - 896
  • [34] Maxillomandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Efunkoya, Akinwale A.
    Bamgbose, Babatunde O.
    Adebola, Rafael A.
    Adeoye, Joshua B.
    Akpasa, Izegboya O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 25 (05) : 1787 - 1792
  • [35] Distraction Osteogenesis for Brachymetatarsia
    Haleem, Amgad M.
    Ellis, Scott J.
    Fragomen, Austin T.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2014, 13 (04): : 184 - 190
  • [36] Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Sahoo, Nanda Kishore
    Issar, Yuvraj
    Thakral, Ankur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (08) : E743 - E746
  • [37] Alveolar distraction osteogenesis
    Chang, Hong-Po
    Chou, Tsau-Mau
    Tseng, Yu-Chuan
    Hsu, Han-Jen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2016, 11 (02) : 212 - 213
  • [38] Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis
    Hollier, LH
    Gosain, A
    Stelnecki, E
    Longaker, M
    McCarthy, JG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 10 (03) : 268 - 282
  • [39] Distraction osteogenesis in craniosynostosis
    Sandhaus, Henya
    Johnson, Matthew D.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2021, 29 (04): : 304 - 313
  • [40] Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis
    Winters, Ryan
    Tatum, Sherard A.
    [J]. FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 22 (04) : 653 - +