Overview on GHG emissions of raw milk production and a comparison of milk and cheese carbon footprints of two different systems from northern Spain

被引:34
|
作者
Laca, Amanda [1 ]
Gomez, Natalia [1 ]
Laca, Adriana [1 ]
Diaz, Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oviedo, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, C Julian Claveria S-N, E-33071 Oviedo, Spain
关键词
LCA; Dairy farm; Raw milk production; Pasture-based; Semi-confinement; Carbon footprint; Cheese; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DAIRY PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FARMING SYSTEMS; RESOURCE USE; LIVESTOCK; MANAGEMENT; COWS; CONFINEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-019-06857-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Milk production has been estimated to contribute 3-4% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the carbon footprint associated with raw milk can vary, depending on a variety of factors, such as the geographical area, species of cow and production system. In this study, a global overview of research published on the carbon footprint (CF) of raw cow milk is provided. Additionally, two different dairy systems (semi-confinement and pasture-based) have been analysed by life-cycle assessment (LCA) in order to determine their effect on the CF of the milk produced. Inventory data were obtained directly from these facilities, and the main factors involved in milk production were included (co-products, livestock food, water, electricity, diesel, cleaning elements, transport, manure and slurry management, gas emissions to air etc.). In agreement with reviewed literature, it was found that the carbon footprint of milk was basically determined by the cattle feeding system and gas emissions from the cows. The values of milk CF found in the systems under study were within the range for cow milk production worldwide (0.9-4.7 kgCO(2)eq kg(FPCM)(-1)). Specifically, in the semi-confinement and the pasture-based dairy farms, 1.22 and 0.99 kgCO(2)eq kg(FPCM)(-1) were obtained, respectively. The environmental benefits obtained with the pasture grazing system are not only mainly due to the lower use of purchased fodder but also to the allocation between milk and meat that was found to be a determining methodological factor in CF calculation. Finally, data from the evaluated dairy systems have been employed to analyse the influence of raw milk production on cheese manufacturing. With this aim, the CF of a small-scale cheese factory has also been obtained. The main subsystems involved (raw materials, water, electricity, energy, cleaning products, packaging materials, transport, wastes and gas emissions) were included in the inventory of the cheese factory. CF values were 16.6 and 14.7 kgCO(2)eq kg(-1) of cheese for milk produced in semi-confinement and pasture-based systems, respectively. The production of raw milk represented more than 60% of CO(2)eq emissions associated with cheese, so the primary production is the critical factor in reducing the GHG emissions due to cheese making.
引用
收藏
页码:1650 / 1666
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparison of two traditional camel calf management systems in Kenya and their implications for milk production
    Simpkin, SP
    Rowlinson, P
    Tullu, D
    Lesorogol, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CAMEL PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 1997, 4 (02) : 229 - 234
  • [42] Sale of Raw Milk in Northern Italy: Food Safety Implications and Comparison of Different Analytical Methodologies for Detection of Foodborne Pathogens
    Giacometti, Federica
    Serraino, Andrea
    Finazzi, Guido
    Daminelli, Paolo
    Losio, Marina N.
    Arrigoni, Norma
    Piva, Silvia
    Florio, Daniela
    Riu, Raffaela
    Zanoni, Renato G.
    [J]. FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE, 2012, 9 (04) : 293 - 297
  • [43] Environmental profile of Sardinian sheep milk cheese supply chain: A comparison between two contrasting dairy systems
    Vagnoni, Enrico
    Franca, Antonello
    Porqueddu, Claudio
    Duce, Pierpaolo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 165 : 1078 - 1089
  • [44] Technical note:: Determination of acidity in whole raw milk:: Comparison of results obtained by two different analytical methods
    Fabro, MA
    Milanesio, HV
    Robert, LM
    Speranza, JL
    Murphy, M
    Rodríguez, G
    Castañeda, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2006, 89 (03) : 859 - 861
  • [45] Data-driven Decision Support Tools for Reducing GHG Emissions from Livestock Production Systems: Overview and Challenges
    Thumba, Drisya Alex
    Lazarova-Molnar, Sanja
    Niloofar, Parisa
    [J]. 2020 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET OF THINGS: SYSTEMS, MANAGEMENT AND SECURITY (IOTSMS), 2020,
  • [46] Harnessing diversity of Lactococcus lactis from raw goat milk: Design of an indigenous starter for the production of Rocamadour, a French PDO cheese
    Couderc, Christel
    Laroute, Valerie
    Coddeville, Michele
    Caillaud, Marie-Aurore
    Jard, Gwenaelle
    Raynaud, Christine
    Cocaign-Bousquet, Muriel
    Tormo, Helene
    Daveran-Mingot, Marie-Line
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 379
  • [47] Comparing the Behavior of Multidrug-Resistant and Pansusceptible Salmonella during the Production and Aging of a Gouda Cheese Manufactured from Raw Milk
    D'Amico, Dennis J.
    Druart, Marc J.
    Donnelly, Catherine W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2014, 77 (06) : 903 - 913
  • [48] Milk production, methane emissions, nitrogen, and energy balance of cows fed diets based on different forage systems
    Gislon, G.
    Colombini, S.
    Borreani, G.
    Crovetto, G. M.
    Sandrucci, A.
    Galassi, G.
    Tabacco, E.
    Rapetti, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 (09) : 8048 - 8061
  • [49] Identification of the microflora in the complete Ragusano cheese processing from milk produced at two different farm locations.
    Licitra, G.
    Parayre, S.
    Falentin, H.
    Carpino, S.
    Fallico, V.
    Pediliggieri, C.
    Lortal, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 84 : 279 - 279
  • [50] Survival rate of Escherichia coli O157 in artificially contaminated raw and thermized ewe milk in different Pecorino cheese production processes
    Centorotola, Gabriella
    Sperandii, Anna Franca
    Tucci, Patrizia
    D'Alterio, Nicola
    Ricci, Lucilla
    Goffredo, Elisa
    Mancini, Maria Emanuela
    Iannetti, Luigi
    Salini, Romolo
    Migliorati, Giacomo
    Pomilio, Francesco
    Valiani, Andrea
    Ortenzi, Roberta
    Lanni, Luigi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 347