Process-Tracing Methods in Decision Making: On Growing Up in the 70s

被引:71
|
作者
Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Johnson, Joseph G. [3 ,4 ]
Bockenholt, Ulf
Goldstein, Daniel G. [5 ]
Russo, J. Edward [6 ]
Sullivan, Nicolette J. [7 ]
Willemsen, Martijn C. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Berlin, Germany
[3] Miami Univ, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[5] Microsoft Res, New York, NY USA
[6] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[7] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[8] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
process tracing; distortion risk; eye tracking; information boards; mouse tracking; neural techniques; verbal protocols; MODELS; FIXATIONS; BEHAVIOR; EMOTION; GAMES;
D O I
10.1177/0963721417708229
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Decision research has experienced a shift from simple algebraic theories of choice to an appreciation of mental processes underlying choice. A variety of process-tracing methods has helped researchers test these process explanations. Here, we provide a survey of these methods, including specific examples for subject reports, movement-based measures, peripheral psychophysiology, and neural techniques. We show how these methods can inform phenomena as varied as attention, emotion, strategy use, and understanding neural correlates. Two important future developments are identified: broadening the number of explicit tests of proposed processes through formal modeling and determining standards and best practices for data collection.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:442 / 450
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条