How time-inconsistent preferences affect investment timing for rail transit

被引:8
|
作者
Guo, Qian-Wen [1 ]
Chen, Shumin [2 ]
Schonfeld, Paul [3 ]
Li, Zhongfei [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Finance & Investment, Sun Yat Sen Business Sch, Bldg 388,135 Xingangxi Rd, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Management, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 1173 Glenn Martin Hall, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Rail transit investment; Time-inconsistent preferences; Real options; Population volatility; CONSUMPTION; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.trb.2018.10.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We address optimal rail transit investment issues considering time-inconsistent preferences and population uncertainty. Instead of adopting the typical real options approach which assumes that authorities possess a constant discount rate over time, we propose an extension of real options analysis by modeling authorities' intertemporal choices with a quasi-hyperbolic discount function. Depending on the assumption about the strategies guiding the behaviors of future authorities, we consider three types of authorities, namely time-consistent authority, naive authority and sophisticated authority, of which the latter two are time-inconsistent. First, an optimal transit investment timing model is proposed. Then, solutions for the above three types of authorities are derived and compared. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed model by conducting numerical tests and applying it to Dalian, China. Main findings include: (1) an authority with time -inconsistent preferences makes decisions earlier than a standard, time-consistent authority; (2) the sophisticated authority invests earlier than the naive authority. Other implications of considering time -inconsistent preferences are also identified. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 192
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Can time-inconsistent preferences explain hypothetical biases?
    Krcal, Ondrej
    Peer, Stefanie
    Stanek, Rostislav
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF TRANSPORTATION, 2021, 25
  • [42] Non-parametric Analysis of Time-Inconsistent Preferences
    Blow, Laura
    Browning, Martin
    Crawford, Ian
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2021, 88 (06): : 2687 - 2734
  • [43] Optimal investor life cycle decisions with time-inconsistent preferences
    Chen, Shumin
    Luo, Dan
    Yao, Haixiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2024, 161
  • [44] How time-inconsistent preferences influence venture capital exit decisions? A new perspective for grandstanding
    Li, Yanzhao
    Guo, Ju-E
    Sun, Shaolong
    Li, Yongwu
    [J]. FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [45] Optimal dividend strategy for a diffusion model with time-inconsistent preferences
    Li, Zhong-Fei
    Chen, Shu-Min
    Zeng, Yan
    [J]. Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2015, 35 (07): : 1633 - 1645
  • [46] Time-inconsistent preferences and the minimum legal tobacco consuming age
    Crettez, Bertrand
    Deloche, Regis
    [J]. RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 33 (02) : 176 - 195
  • [47] How time-inconsistent preferences influence venture capital exit decisions? A new perspective for grandstanding
    Yanzhao Li
    Ju-e Guo
    Shaolong Sun
    Yongwu Li
    [J]. Financial Innovation, 8
  • [48] Time-inconsistent investment, financial constraints, and cash flow hedging
    Lien, Donald
    Yu, Chia-Feng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 35 : 72 - 79
  • [49] Singular dividend optimization for a linear diffusion model with time-inconsistent preferences
    Zhu, Jinxia
    Siu, Tak Kuen
    Yang, Hailiang
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 285 (01) : 66 - 80
  • [50] Life-cycle planning with CEV model and time-inconsistent preferences
    Wang, Hao
    Hu, Shujie
    Siu, Tak Kuen
    Wang, Rongming
    Wang, Ning
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 96