A dimension range representation (DRR) measure for self-organizing maps

被引:4
|
作者
Clark, Stephanie [1 ]
Sisson, Scott. A. [1 ]
Sharma, Ashish [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Math & Stat, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
Self-organizing maps; Quality; Error measure; Dimension; Coverage; Map size; Map shape; Extreme values; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; RUNOFF; RIVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.patcog.2015.11.002
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A common tool in exploratory data analysis, the self-organizing map, or SOM, is used for clustering and visualisation to discover patterns in large, high-dimensional data sets. The output map may be interpreted to gain an understanding of the structure of the original data set, correlations between variables, and the characteristics the clusters formed by placing the data on the map. However, if the map does not represent all dimensions of the data in an informative way, map interpretation may be misleading. Currently there is no measure of how well a SOM represents each dimension of a data set, and therefore how descriptive the map vectors are of the full structure of the data they represent. A dimension range representation (DRR) measure is proposed to quantify how well represented each dimension of the data set is by the map vectors of the SOM. This can be used to choose between different map size and shape options that could potentially represent a specific data set. Through examples, it is demonstrated how the DRR measure is used to inform the choice of map size and shape, leading to more informative insight into the original data set through examination of the output map. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 286
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Self-organizing maps for texture classification
    Nedyalko Petrov
    Antoniya Georgieva
    Ivan Jordanov
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2013, 22 : 1499 - 1508
  • [42] Self-organizing maps with refractory period
    Neme, Antonio
    Mireles, Victor
    ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS - ICANN 2007, PT 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4669 : 369 - +
  • [43] ON THE ORDERING CONDITIONS FOR SELF-ORGANIZING MAPS
    BUDINICH, M
    TAYLOR, JG
    NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1995, 7 (02) : 284 - 289
  • [44] A NOTE ON SELF-ORGANIZING SEMANTIC MAPS
    BEZDEK, JC
    PAL, NR
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1995, 6 (05): : 1029 - 1036
  • [45] SELF-ORGANIZING MAPS FOR INTERNAL REPRESENTATIONS
    RITTER, H
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1990, 52 (2-3): : 128 - 136
  • [46] A CHIP FOR SELF-ORGANIZING FEATURE MAPS
    RUPING, S
    GOSER, K
    RUCKERT, U
    IEEE MICRO, 1995, 15 (03) : 57 - 59
  • [47] Fuzzy Relational Self-Organizing Maps
    Khalilia, Mohammed
    Popescu, Mihail
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2012,
  • [48] Self-organizing maps of symbol strings
    Kohonen, T
    Somervuo, P
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 1998, 21 (1-3) : 19 - 30
  • [49] Hyperparameter selection for self-organizing maps
    Utsugi, A
    NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1997, 9 (03) : 623 - 635
  • [50] Monitoring Blockchains with Self-Organizing Maps
    Chawathe, Sudarshan S.
    2018 17TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRUST, SECURITY AND PRIVACY IN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS (IEEE TRUSTCOM) / 12TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (IEEE BIGDATASE), 2018, : 1870 - 1875