A dimension range representation (DRR) measure for self-organizing maps

被引:4
|
作者
Clark, Stephanie [1 ]
Sisson, Scott. A. [1 ]
Sharma, Ashish [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Math & Stat, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
Self-organizing maps; Quality; Error measure; Dimension; Coverage; Map size; Map shape; Extreme values; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; RUNOFF; RIVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.patcog.2015.11.002
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A common tool in exploratory data analysis, the self-organizing map, or SOM, is used for clustering and visualisation to discover patterns in large, high-dimensional data sets. The output map may be interpreted to gain an understanding of the structure of the original data set, correlations between variables, and the characteristics the clusters formed by placing the data on the map. However, if the map does not represent all dimensions of the data in an informative way, map interpretation may be misleading. Currently there is no measure of how well a SOM represents each dimension of a data set, and therefore how descriptive the map vectors are of the full structure of the data they represent. A dimension range representation (DRR) measure is proposed to quantify how well represented each dimension of the data set is by the map vectors of the SOM. This can be used to choose between different map size and shape options that could potentially represent a specific data set. Through examples, it is demonstrated how the DRR measure is used to inform the choice of map size and shape, leading to more informative insight into the original data set through examination of the output map. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 286
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Novel Measure for Quantifying the Topology Preservation of Self-Organizing Feature Maps
    Mu-Chun Su
    Hsiao-Te Chang
    Chien-Hsing Chou
    Neural Processing Letters, 2002, 15 : 137 - 145
  • [22] CQoCO: A measure for comparative quality of coverage and organization for self-organizing maps
    Beaton, Derek
    Valova, Iren
    MacLean, Daniel
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2010, 73 (10-12) : 2147 - 2159
  • [23] A novel measure for quantifying the topology preservation of self-organizing feature maps
    Su, MC
    Chang, HT
    Chou, CH
    NEURAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2002, 15 (02) : 137 - 145
  • [24] Limit Cycle Representation of Spatial Locations Using Self-Organizing Maps
    Huang, Di-Wei
    Gentili, Rodolphe J.
    Reggia, James A.
    2014 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, COGNITIVE ALGORITHMS, MIND, AND BRAIN (CCMB), 2014, : 79 - 84
  • [25] High-resolution Self-Organizing Maps for advanced visualization and dimension reduction
    Saraswati, Ayu
    Van Tuc Nguyen
    Hagenbuchner, Markus
    Tsoi, Ah Chung
    NEURAL NETWORKS, 2018, 105 : 166 - 184
  • [26] Transition times in self-organizing maps
    Heskes, TM
    BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 1996, 75 (01) : 49 - 57
  • [27] Self-Organizing Maps with a Single Neuron
    Georgiou, George M.
    Voigt, Kerstin
    2013 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2013,
  • [28] Fault tolerance of self-organizing maps
    Bernard Girau
    Cesar Torres-Huitzil
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2020, 32 : 17977 - 17993
  • [29] On the stationarity in some self-organizing maps
    Hoshino, M
    Kimura, Y
    Kaku, I
    ICIM' 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, 2004, : 754 - 760
  • [30] Fast Self-Organizing Maps Training
    Giobergia, Flavio
    Baralis, Elena
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2019, : 2257 - 2266