Patient-reported outcomes supporting anticancer product approvals

被引:34
|
作者
Rock, Edwin P.
Kennedy, Dianne L.
Furness, Melissa H.
Pierce, William F.
Pazdur, Richard
Burke, Laurie B.
机构
[1] US FDA, Study Endpoints & Label Dev Team, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[2] US FDA, Off Oncol Drug Prod, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.11.3803
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In 2006, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published draft guidance to provide recommendations for development, validation, implementation, and interpretation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures that can support treatment benefit claims in product labeling. Here, we summarize and discuss FDA approvals of anticancer products in the context of the draft guidance. We identified anticancer product approvals having efficacy claim(s) based at least in part on a PRO. In addition, we collated limitations of PRO instruments commonly submitted for regulatory review over the period from October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006. From 1995 onward, nine indications were approved for seven anticancer products based at least in part on a PRO. In eight of nine approvals, PRO data supplemented other evidence of clinical benefit. In seven approvals, the PRO measured a single symptom or functional domain that was directly attributable to the treatment benefit observed in the disease. The FDA's draft PRO guidance describes principles that have been used in anticancer product approvals for more than a decade. PRO end points typically support treatment benefit claims that refer to a patient's symptoms or ability to function. Single-item PROs may be acceptable. PRO data should be both internally consistent and aligned with other evidence of clinical benefit. The FDA encourages sponsors to consult with the FDA early in the process of PRO development.
引用
收藏
页码:5094 / 5099
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (PROS) IN ANTINEOPLASTIC PRODUCT APPROVALS IN EUROPE AND IN THE USA
    Patrick, D.
    Acquadro, C.
    Teschendorf, B.
    Emery, M. P.
    Caron, M.
    Arnould, B.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A431 - A431
  • [2] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (PROS) IN ANTIDIABETIC PRODUCT APPROVALS IN EUROPE AND IN THE USA
    Caron, M.
    Emery, M. P.
    Perrier, L. L.
    Acquadro, C.
    Escanez-Virieux, M. P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A169 - A170
  • [3] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES SUPPORTING ONCOLOGY PRODUCT LABELING CLAIMS: TRENDS AND CHALLENGES
    Hao, Y.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (03) : A54 - A54
  • [4] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GUIDANCE
    Mordin, M.
    Lewis, S.
    Gnanasakthy, A.
    Demuro-Mercon, C.
    Copley-Merriman, K.
    Fehnel, S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (03) : A17 - A18
  • [5] Patient-reported outcomes in the evaluation of toxicity of anticancer treatments
    Di Maio, Massimo
    Basch, Ethan
    Bryce, Jane
    Perrone, Francesco
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 13 (05) : 319 - 325
  • [6] Patient-reported outcomes in the evaluation of toxicity of anticancer treatments
    Massimo Di Maio
    Ethan Basch
    Jane Bryce
    Francesco Perrone
    [J]. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2016, 13 : 319 - 325
  • [7] Patient-reported outcomes
    Garratt, Andrew
    [J]. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2015, 135 (07) : 668 - 668
  • [8] Patient-reported outcomes Recording and evaluating patient-reported endpoints
    Hilser, Thomas
    Darr, Christopher
    Gruenwald, Viktor
    [J]. ONKOLOGIE, 2022, 28 (10): : 940 - 946
  • [9] Telemedizinische Erfassung von „patient-reported outcomes“Remote monitoring of patient-reported outcomes
    V. Siefert
    G. Welzel
    M. Blessing
    L. Jahnke
    J. Hesser
    F. Wenz
    F. A. Giordano
    [J]. Forum, 2018, 33 (2) : 94 - 100
  • [10] Patient-reported outcomes and patient voices
    Asci, Gulay
    Ok, Ercan
    [J]. SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 2022, 35 (05) : 457 - 458