Patient-reported outcomes supporting anticancer product approvals

被引:34
|
作者
Rock, Edwin P.
Kennedy, Dianne L.
Furness, Melissa H.
Pierce, William F.
Pazdur, Richard
Burke, Laurie B.
机构
[1] US FDA, Study Endpoints & Label Dev Team, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[2] US FDA, Off Oncol Drug Prod, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.11.3803
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In 2006, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published draft guidance to provide recommendations for development, validation, implementation, and interpretation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures that can support treatment benefit claims in product labeling. Here, we summarize and discuss FDA approvals of anticancer products in the context of the draft guidance. We identified anticancer product approvals having efficacy claim(s) based at least in part on a PRO. In addition, we collated limitations of PRO instruments commonly submitted for regulatory review over the period from October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006. From 1995 onward, nine indications were approved for seven anticancer products based at least in part on a PRO. In eight of nine approvals, PRO data supplemented other evidence of clinical benefit. In seven approvals, the PRO measured a single symptom or functional domain that was directly attributable to the treatment benefit observed in the disease. The FDA's draft PRO guidance describes principles that have been used in anticancer product approvals for more than a decade. PRO end points typically support treatment benefit claims that refer to a patient's symptoms or ability to function. Single-item PROs may be acceptable. PRO data should be both internally consistent and aligned with other evidence of clinical benefit. The FDA encourages sponsors to consult with the FDA early in the process of PRO development.
引用
收藏
页码:5094 / 5099
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES TO FACILITATE MARKET ACCESS DURING A PRODUCT LIFECYCLE
    Rofail, D.
    Abetz, L.
    Heelis, R.
    Brown, C.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A572 - A573
  • [42] Assessing and demonstrating data saturation in qualitative inquiry supporting patient-reported outcomes research
    Kerr, Cicely
    Nixon, Annabel
    Wild, Diane
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2010, 10 (03) : 269 - 281
  • [43] How Vital Are Patient-Reported Outcomes?
    Chang, Steven S.
    Movsas, Benjamin
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2022, 114 (03) : 347 - 348
  • [44] State of the Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Hays, Ron D.
    Chang, Chih-Hung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2021, 5 (01)
  • [45] Rising importance of patient-reported outcomes
    Atherton, Pamela J.
    Sloan, Jeff A.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2006, 7 (11): : 883 - 884
  • [46] Patient-reported outcomes in an IBD clinic
    Bryan, Elizabeth
    Lochridge, Brooke
    Shah, Nisha
    Zuckerman, Autumn
    Moore, Ryan
    Choi, Leena
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2022, 38 : 22 - 22
  • [47] Impact of neratinib on patient-reported outcomes
    Iyer, S.
    Turnbull, K. W.
    Powell, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [48] Patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice
    Nordhausen T.
    Vordermark D.
    Al-Ali H.-K.
    Schmidt H.
    [J]. best practice onkologie, 2022, 17 (12) : 636 - 646
  • [49] Patient-reported outcomes for ambulatory surgery
    Warnakulasuriya, Samantha R.
    Patel, Reshma C.
    Singleton, Georgina F.
    Moonesinghe, S. Ramani
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 33 (06) : 768 - 773
  • [50] PILOT FOR COLLECTING PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES
    Mims, C. R.
    Anderson, V
    Gamble, S.
    Thomas, L. K.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2019, 54 : S440 - S440