共 50 条
Measuring good governance: piloting an instrument for evaluating good governance principles
被引:16
|作者:
Pomeranz, Emily F.
[1
,2
]
Stedman, Richard C.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Nat Resources, Ctr Conservat Social Sci, Fernow Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Michigan Dept Nat Resources, 4166 Legacy Pkwy, Lansing, MI 48911 USA
基金:
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词:
Natural resource governance;
good governance;
community-based resource management;
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT;
PROCEDURAL JUSTICE;
MANAGEMENT;
PARTICIPATION;
COMMUNITIES;
PERCEPTIONS;
LESSONS;
D O I:
10.1080/1523908X.2020.1753181
中图分类号:
F0 [经济学];
F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理];
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号:
0201 ;
020105 ;
03 ;
0303 ;
摘要:
As federal, state, and local governments and agencies respond to calls to make decisions and implement programs according to tenets of 'good governance', a need exists to develop methods for systematically evaluating performance. 'Good governance' has been characterized as including a wide array of principles, which vary across literatures. Comparatively little scholarship has sought to systematically quantify program achievement in accordance with these principles. We develop and present a scale for measuring program achievement in accordance with eight main principles of good governance: inclusivity, fairness, transparency, accountability, legitimacy, direction, performance, and capability. We present the results of a pilot implementation of the scale within the context of two community-based deer management programs. Our results suggest that these principles of good governance may not sort into distinct dimensions in a real-world context.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 440
页数:13
相关论文