Evaluation of cloud-phase retrieval methods for SEVIRI on Meteosat-8 using ground-based lidar and cloud radar data

被引:31
|
作者
Wolters, Erwin L. A. [1 ]
Roebeling, Robert A. [1 ]
Feijt, Arnout J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Netherlands Meteorol Inst, NL-3730 AE De Bilt, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1175/2007JAMC1591.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Three cloud-phase determination algorithms from passive satellite imagers are explored to assess their suitability for climate monitoring purposes in midlatitude coastal climate zones. The algorithms are the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-like thermal infrared cloud-phase method, the Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring (CM-SAF) method, and an International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP)-like method. Using one year (May 2004-April 2005) of data from the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) on the first Meteosat Second Generation satellite (Meteosat-8), retrievals of the methods are compared with collocated and synchronized ground-based cloud-phase retrievals obtained from cloud radar and lidar observations at Cabauw, Netherlands. Three aspects of the satellite retrievals are evaluated: 1) instantaneous cloud-phase retrievals, 2) monthly-averaged water and ice cloud occurrence frequency, and 3) diurnal cycle of cloud phase for May-August 2004. For the instantaneous cases, all methods have a very small bias for thick water and ice cloud retrievals (similar to 5%). The ISCCP-like method has a larger bias for pure water clouds (similar to 10%), which is likely due to the 260-K threshold leading to misdetection of water clouds existing at lower temperatures. For the monthly-averaged water and ice cloud occurrence, the CM-SAF method is best capable of reproducing the annual cycle, mainly for the water cloud occurrence frequency, for which an almost constant positive bias of similar to 8% was found. The ISCCP- and MODIS-like methods have more problems in detecting the annual cycle, especially during the winter months. The difference in annual cycle detection among the three methods is most probably related to the use of visible/near-infrared reflectances that enable a more direct observation of cloud phase. The diurnal cycle in cloud phase is reproduced well by all methods. The MODIS-like method reproduces the diurnal cycle best, with correlations of 0.89 and 0.86 for water and ice cloud occurrence frequency, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:1723 / 1738
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cb-TRAM: Tracking and monitoring severe convection from onset over rapid development to mature phase using multi-channel Meteosat-8 SEVIRI data
    T. Zinner
    H. Mannstein
    A. Tafferner
    Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2008, 101 : 191 - 210
  • [42] Prediction of cloud ice signatures in submillimetre emission spectra by means of ground-based radar and in situ microphysical data
    Rydberg, B.
    Eriksson, P.
    Buehler, S. A.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 133 : 151 - 162
  • [43] Volcanic Ash Cloud Observation using Ground-based Ka-band Radar and Near-Infrared Lidar Ceilometer during the Eyjafjallajokull eruption
    Marzano, Frank S.
    Mereu, Luigi
    Montopoli, Mario
    Cimini, Domenico
    Martucci, Giovanni
    ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 57
  • [44] Assessment of FY-4A and Himawari-8 Cloud Top Height Retrieval through Comparison with Ground-Based Millimeter Radar at Sites in Tibet and Beijing
    Bo Liu
    Juan Huo
    Daren Lyu
    Xin Wang
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2021, 38 : 1334 - 1350
  • [45] Assessment of FY-4A and Himawari-8 Cloud Top Height Retrieval through Comparison with Ground-Based Millimeter Radar at Sites in Tibet and Beijing
    Liu, Bo
    Huo, Juan
    Lyu, Daren
    Wang, Xin
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2021, 38 (08) : 1334 - 1350
  • [46] Validation of aerosol and cloud layer structures from the space-borne lidar CALIOP using a ground-based lidar in Seoul, Korea
    Kim, S. -W
    Berthier, S.
    Raut, J. -C.
    Chazette, P.
    Dulac, F.
    Yoon, S. -C.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2008, 8 (13) : 3705 - 3720
  • [47] Correction of CCI cloud data over the Swiss Alps using ground-based radiation measurements
    Jeanneret, Fanny
    Martucci, Giovanni
    Pinnock, Simon
    Berne, Alexis
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2018, 11 (07) : 4153 - 4170
  • [48] Assessment of FY-4A and Himawari-8 Cloud Top Height Retrieval through Comparison with Ground-Based Millimeter Radar at Sites in Tibet and Beijing
    Bo LIU
    Juan HUO
    Daren LYU
    Xin WANG
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2021, 38 (08) : 1334 - 1350
  • [49] Microphysical modeling of a midlatitude "polar stratospheric cloud" event: Comparisons against multiwavelength ground-based and spaceborne lidar data
    Jumelet, Julien
    Bekki, Slimane
    Seifert, Patric
    Montoux, Nadege
    Vernier, Jean-Paul
    Pelon, Jacques
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2009, 114
  • [50] Evaluation of cirrus cloud properties derived from MODIS data using cloud properties derived from ground-based observations collected at the ARM SGP site
    Mace, GG
    Zhang, YY
    Platnick, S
    King, MD
    Minnis, P
    Yang, P
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY, 2005, 44 (02): : 221 - 240