Evaluation of cloud-phase retrieval methods for SEVIRI on Meteosat-8 using ground-based lidar and cloud radar data

被引:31
|
作者
Wolters, Erwin L. A. [1 ]
Roebeling, Robert A. [1 ]
Feijt, Arnout J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Netherlands Meteorol Inst, NL-3730 AE De Bilt, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1175/2007JAMC1591.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Three cloud-phase determination algorithms from passive satellite imagers are explored to assess their suitability for climate monitoring purposes in midlatitude coastal climate zones. The algorithms are the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-like thermal infrared cloud-phase method, the Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring (CM-SAF) method, and an International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP)-like method. Using one year (May 2004-April 2005) of data from the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) on the first Meteosat Second Generation satellite (Meteosat-8), retrievals of the methods are compared with collocated and synchronized ground-based cloud-phase retrievals obtained from cloud radar and lidar observations at Cabauw, Netherlands. Three aspects of the satellite retrievals are evaluated: 1) instantaneous cloud-phase retrievals, 2) monthly-averaged water and ice cloud occurrence frequency, and 3) diurnal cycle of cloud phase for May-August 2004. For the instantaneous cases, all methods have a very small bias for thick water and ice cloud retrievals (similar to 5%). The ISCCP-like method has a larger bias for pure water clouds (similar to 10%), which is likely due to the 260-K threshold leading to misdetection of water clouds existing at lower temperatures. For the monthly-averaged water and ice cloud occurrence, the CM-SAF method is best capable of reproducing the annual cycle, mainly for the water cloud occurrence frequency, for which an almost constant positive bias of similar to 8% was found. The ISCCP- and MODIS-like methods have more problems in detecting the annual cycle, especially during the winter months. The difference in annual cycle detection among the three methods is most probably related to the use of visible/near-infrared reflectances that enable a more direct observation of cloud phase. The diurnal cycle in cloud phase is reproduced well by all methods. The MODIS-like method reproduces the diurnal cycle best, with correlations of 0.89 and 0.86 for water and ice cloud occurrence frequency, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:1723 / 1738
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A new retrieval for cloud liquid water path using a ground-based microwave radiometer and measurements of cloud temperature
    Liljegren, JC
    Clothiaux, EE
    Mace, GG
    Kato, S
    Dong, XQ
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D13): : 14485 - 14500
  • [22] Assessment of Cloudsat Reflectivity Measurements and Ice Cloud Properties Using Ground-Based and Airborne Cloud Radar Observations
    Protat, A.
    Bouniol, D.
    Delanoe, J.
    May, P. T.
    Plana-Fattori, A.
    Hasson, A.
    O'Connor, E.
    Goersdorf, U.
    Heymsfield, A. J.
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 26 (09) : 1717 - 1741
  • [23] Cloud phase determination using ground-based AERI observations at SHEBA
    Turner, DD
    Ackerman, SA
    Baum, BA
    Revercomb, HE
    Yang, P
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY, 2003, 42 (06): : 701 - 715
  • [24] Examination of the Quality of GOSAT/CAI Cloud Flag Data over Beijing Using Ground-based Cloud Data
    霍娟
    章文星
    曾晓夏
    吕达仁
    刘毅
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2013, 30 (06) : 1526 - 1534
  • [25] Examination of the quality of GOSAT/CAI cloud flag data over Beijing using ground-based cloud data
    Huo Juan
    Zhang Wenxing
    Zeng Xiaoxia
    Lu Daren
    Liu Yi
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2013, 30 (06) : 1526 - 1534
  • [26] Examination of the quality of GOSAT/CAI cloud flag data over Beijing using ground-based cloud data
    Juan Huo
    Wenxing Zhang
    Xiaoxia Zeng
    Daren Lü
    Yi Liu
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2013, 30 : 1526 - 1534
  • [27] Cloud phase discrimination technology based on spaceborne millimeter wave radar and lidar data
    Yan Wei
    Ren Jian-Qi
    Lu Wen
    Wu Xian
    JOURNAL OF INFRARED AND MILLIMETER WAVES, 2011, 30 (01) : 68 - 73
  • [28] An assessment of Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) stereo-derived cloud top heights and cloud top winds using ground-based radar, lidar, and microwave radiometers
    Marchand, Roger T.
    Ackerman, Thomas P.
    Moroney, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2007, 112 (D6)
  • [29] Observations of cold-cloud properties in the Norwegian Arctic using ground-based and spaceborne lidar
    Schafer, Britta
    Carlsen, Tim
    Hanssen, Ingrid
    Gausa, Michael
    Storelvmo, Trude
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2022, 22 (14) : 9537 - 9551
  • [30] Validation of Ash/Dust Detections from SEVIRI Data Using ACTRIS/EARLINET Ground-Based LIDAR Measurements
    Falconieri, Alfredo
    Papagiannopoulos, Nikolaos
    Marchese, Francesco
    Filizzola, Carolina
    Trippetta, Serena
    Pergola, Nicola
    Pappalardo, Gelsomina
    Tramutoli, Valerio
    Mona, Lucia
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (07)