Evaluation of cloud-phase retrieval methods for SEVIRI on Meteosat-8 using ground-based lidar and cloud radar data

被引:31
|
作者
Wolters, Erwin L. A. [1 ]
Roebeling, Robert A. [1 ]
Feijt, Arnout J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Netherlands Meteorol Inst, NL-3730 AE De Bilt, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1175/2007JAMC1591.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Three cloud-phase determination algorithms from passive satellite imagers are explored to assess their suitability for climate monitoring purposes in midlatitude coastal climate zones. The algorithms are the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-like thermal infrared cloud-phase method, the Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring (CM-SAF) method, and an International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP)-like method. Using one year (May 2004-April 2005) of data from the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) on the first Meteosat Second Generation satellite (Meteosat-8), retrievals of the methods are compared with collocated and synchronized ground-based cloud-phase retrievals obtained from cloud radar and lidar observations at Cabauw, Netherlands. Three aspects of the satellite retrievals are evaluated: 1) instantaneous cloud-phase retrievals, 2) monthly-averaged water and ice cloud occurrence frequency, and 3) diurnal cycle of cloud phase for May-August 2004. For the instantaneous cases, all methods have a very small bias for thick water and ice cloud retrievals (similar to 5%). The ISCCP-like method has a larger bias for pure water clouds (similar to 10%), which is likely due to the 260-K threshold leading to misdetection of water clouds existing at lower temperatures. For the monthly-averaged water and ice cloud occurrence, the CM-SAF method is best capable of reproducing the annual cycle, mainly for the water cloud occurrence frequency, for which an almost constant positive bias of similar to 8% was found. The ISCCP- and MODIS-like methods have more problems in detecting the annual cycle, especially during the winter months. The difference in annual cycle detection among the three methods is most probably related to the use of visible/near-infrared reflectances that enable a more direct observation of cloud phase. The diurnal cycle in cloud phase is reproduced well by all methods. The MODIS-like method reproduces the diurnal cycle best, with correlations of 0.89 and 0.86 for water and ice cloud occurrence frequency, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:1723 / 1738
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The retrieval of stratocumulus cloud properties by ground-based cloud radar
    Fox, NI
    Illingworth, AJ
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY, 1997, 36 (05): : 485 - 492
  • [2] Tree Species Identification Methods Based on Point Cloud Data Using Ground-based LiDAR
    Wang J.
    Zhang L.
    Lü C.
    Niu L.
    Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49 (11): : 180 - 188
  • [3] Classification of Cloud Phase Using Combined Ground-Based Polarization Lidar and Millimeter Cloud Radar Observations Over the Tibetan Plateau
    Bian, Yuxuan
    Liu, Liping
    Zheng, Jiafeng
    Wu, Songhua
    Dai, Guangyao
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 61
  • [4] The Evaluation of CloudSat and CALIPSO Ice Microphysical Products Using Ground-Based Cloud Radar and Lidar Observations
    Protat, A.
    Delanoe, J.
    O'Connor, E. J.
    L'Ecuyer, T. S.
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 27 (05) : 793 - 810
  • [5] Multiview cloud-top height and wind retrieval with photogrammetric methods:: Application to Meteosat-8 HRV observations
    Seiz, Gabriela
    Tjemkes, Stephen
    Watts, Philip
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (08) : 1182 - 1195
  • [6] Volcanic ash cloud retrieval by ground-based microwave weather radar
    Marzano, Frank Silvio
    Barbieri, Stefano
    Vulpiani, Gianfranco
    Rose, William I.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 44 (11): : 3235 - 3246
  • [7] HIGH-ALTITUDE CLOUD OBSERVATIONS BY GROUND-BASED LIDAR, INFRARED RADIOMETER AND METEOSAT MEASUREMENTS
    FLAMANT, P
    BROGNIEZ, G
    DESBOIS, M
    FOUQUART, Y
    FLOBERT, JF
    VANHOUTTE, JC
    SINGH, UN
    ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE-ATMOSPHERES HYDROSPHERES AND SPACE SCIENCES, 1989, 7 (01): : 1 - 10
  • [8] Tree Species Classification Using Ground-Based LiDAR Data by Various Point Cloud Deep Learning Methods
    Liu, Bingjie
    Huang, Huaguo
    Su, Yong
    Chen, Shuxin
    Li, Zengyuan
    Chen, Erxue
    Tian, Xin
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [9] Validation of liquid cloud property retrievals from SEVIRI using ground-based observations
    Roebeling, R. A.
    Placidi, S.
    Donovan, D. P.
    Russchenberg, H. W. J.
    Feijt, A. J.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2008, 35 (05)
  • [10] Study on the data matching of Ground-based Radar and laser point cloud
    Qiu Zhiwei
    Wang Chenxi
    Yue Jianping
    PACIFIC RIM LASER DAMAGE 2016 - OPTICAL MATERIALS FOR HIGH-POWER LASERS, 2016, 9983