An examination of the convergent and discriminant validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

被引:123
|
作者
Hill, Crystal R. [1 ]
Hughes, Jan N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Coll Educ, Dept Educ Psychol, Sch Psychol Program, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; confirmatory factor analysis; correlated uniqueness model; multitrait-multimethod; validity;
D O I
10.1037/1045-3830.22.3.380
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This study examined the factor structure of the parent and teacher versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; R. Goodman, 1997) with a sample of first-grade children at risk for educational failure. The 5-factor model previously found in studies using exploratory factor analysis was fit to the data for both parent and teacher questionnaires. Fit indices for both versions were marginally adequate. Model fit was comparable across gender and ethnic groups. Factor fit for the parent questionnaire was invariant across parent educational level. The examination of convergent and discriminant validity included peer evaluations of each SDQ construct. Thus, each of the five constructs was evaluated by three sources (parent, teacher, and child). On the basis of D. T Campbell and D. W. Fiske's (1959) multitrait-multimethod approach as well as a confirmatory factor analysis using the correlated uniqueness model, the SDQ has good convergent validity but relatively poor discriminant validity.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 406
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ASSESSMENT OF CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY - RESPONSE
    LOWE, NK
    RYANWENGER, NM
    [J]. RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 1993, 16 (03) : 233 - 234
  • [42] CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY IN ITEM ANALYSIS
    KRUS, DJ
    NEY, RG
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1978, 38 (01) : 135 - 137
  • [43] THE CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY OF THE NEED FOR COGNITION
    Trogrlic, Aleksandra
    Vasic, Aleksandar
    [J]. PSIHOLOGIJA, 2009, 42 (02) : 173 - 186
  • [44] THE CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY OF THE CHAPMAN SCALES
    BAILEY, B
    WEST, KY
    WIDIGER, TA
    FREIMAN, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1993, 61 (01) : 121 - 135
  • [45] Which should it be called: Convergent validity or discriminant validity?
    Zhu, WM
    [J]. RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2000, 71 (02) : 190 - 194
  • [46] Incremental validity of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Vietnam
    Hoang-Minh Dang
    Ha Nguyen
    Weiss, Bahr
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 29 : 96 - 100
  • [47] The predictive validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for child attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Kristin Romvig Overgaard
    Kathrine Bang Madsen
    Beate Oerbeck
    Svein Friis
    Carsten Obel
    [J]. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2019, 28 : 625 - 633
  • [48] Examining the structural validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in a US sample of custodial grandmothers
    Palmieri, Patrick A.
    Smith, Gregory C.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2007, 19 (02) : 189 - 198
  • [49] The predictive validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in preschool age to identify mental disorders in preadolescence
    Nielsen, Louise G.
    Rimvall, Martin K.
    Clemmensen, Lars
    Munkholm, Anj A.
    Elberling, Hanne
    Olsen, Else Marie
    Rask, Charlotte Ulrikka
    Skovgaard, Anne Mette
    Jeppesen, Pia
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (06):
  • [50] The predictive validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for child attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Overgaard, Kristin Romvig
    Madsen, Kathrine Bang
    Oerbeck, Beate
    Friis, Svein
    Obel, Carsten
    [J]. EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 28 (05) : 625 - 633