An examination of the convergent and discriminant validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

被引:123
|
作者
Hill, Crystal R. [1 ]
Hughes, Jan N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Coll Educ, Dept Educ Psychol, Sch Psychol Program, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; confirmatory factor analysis; correlated uniqueness model; multitrait-multimethod; validity;
D O I
10.1037/1045-3830.22.3.380
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This study examined the factor structure of the parent and teacher versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; R. Goodman, 1997) with a sample of first-grade children at risk for educational failure. The 5-factor model previously found in studies using exploratory factor analysis was fit to the data for both parent and teacher questionnaires. Fit indices for both versions were marginally adequate. Model fit was comparable across gender and ethnic groups. Factor fit for the parent questionnaire was invariant across parent educational level. The examination of convergent and discriminant validity included peer evaluations of each SDQ construct. Thus, each of the five constructs was evaluated by three sources (parent, teacher, and child). On the basis of D. T Campbell and D. W. Fiske's (1959) multitrait-multimethod approach as well as a confirmatory factor analysis using the correlated uniqueness model, the SDQ has good convergent validity but relatively poor discriminant validity.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 406
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The German Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Validity of the Teacher Version for Preschoolers
    Petermann, Ulrike
    Petermann, Franz
    Schreyer, Ina
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2010, 26 (04) : 256 - 262
  • [22] Investigating the validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire to assess ADHD in young adulthood
    Riglin, Lucy
    Agha, Sharifah Shameem
    Eyre, Olga
    Jones, Rhys Bevan
    Wootton, Robyn E.
    Thapar, Ajay K.
    Collishaw, Stephan
    Stergiakouli, Evie
    Langley, Kate
    Thapar, Anita
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2021, 301
  • [23] Validity of the self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Yemen
    Almaqrami, MH
    Shuwail, AY
    [J]. SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (05) : 592 - 601
  • [24] Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: internal validity and reliability for New Zealand preschoolers
    Kersten, Paula
    Vandal, Alain C.
    Elder, Hinemoa
    McPherson, Kathryn M.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (04):
  • [25] ASSESSMENT OF CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY
    ATWOOD, JR
    HINSHAW, AS
    [J]. RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 1993, 16 (03) : 231 - 233
  • [26] CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY OF THE WIST
    LOVALLO, WR
    SENGEL, RA
    LEBER, WR
    SHAFFER, B
    PISHKIN, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 39 (03) : 321 - 325
  • [28] The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A pilot study on the validity of the self-report version
    R. Goodman
    H. Meltzer
    V. Bailey
    [J]. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1998, 7 : 125 - 130
  • [29] Concurrent Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Indigenous Pre-School Population
    Kersten, Paula
    Vandal, Alain C.
    Elder, Hinemoa
    Tauroa, Robyn
    McPherson, Kathryn M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2017, 26 (08) : 2126 - 2135
  • [30] Concurrent Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Indigenous Pre-School Population
    Paula Kersten
    Alain C. Vandal
    Hinemoa Elder
    Robyn Tauroa
    Kathryn M. McPherson
    [J]. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2017, 26 : 2126 - 2135